View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Vegetative-stage ozone exposure caused no significant fruit yield decrease at final harvest.
TreatmentO 3 exposure at the vegetative stage e0 Directionno significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “O 3 exposure at the vegetative stage, there was no significant decrease in fruit yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–819 t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Ear shading caused a slightly greater yield decrease for Proctor and Herta, without significant varietal differences.
Treatmentshading the ears e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in grain yield by shading the ears was slightly greater for Proctor and Herta, the differences were not significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1781 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Basal 25% defoliation did not significantly decrease dry matter or seed yield per plant.
Treatmentbasal 25% defoliation e0 OutcomeTDM and seed yield plant-1 e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “basal 25% defoliation did not significantly decrease TDM and seed yield plant-1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–840 t0 “mungbean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–78 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
I. tinctoria showed no significant relative yield decrease despite the highest shoot Pb concentration.
Outcomerelative yield decrease e0 Directionno significant e0 Verbatim
e0 “The highest shoot Pb concentration was in I. tinctoria having no significant relative yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1048 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
A 20% decrease in irrigation rate had no significant effect on peach yield .
Treatment20% decrease in irrigation rate e1 Directionno_change inferred e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e6 “to investigate the behavior of peach trees under sustained deficit irrigation (SDI) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–264 e1 “However, for the 20% decrease in irrigation rate, the effect on yield was not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1184 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Soybean yield did not decrease with the warming treatments in the analysis.
Treatmentincreasing warming treatments e4 Directiondid not decrease e4 Verbatim
e4 “Soy yield did not decrease with increasing warming treatments in this analysis, but experimental warming treatments did not exceed optimal soy growth temperature ranges ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1163 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cadmium application did not significantly decrease lettuce crop yield .
Treatment20 kg Cd ha(-1) application e0 Directiondid not result in a significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “20 kg Cd ha(-1) application did not result in a significant decrease in crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–511 e1 “lettuce plant and soil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–270 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
SS3 did not decrease significantly in protein or oil percentage as seed yield increased.
Outcomeprotein or oil percentage e7 Directiondid not decrease e7 Verbatim
e1 “In soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–36 e7 “The identification of a subpopulation (SS3), which did not decrease significantly in protein or oil percentage as seed yield increased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1655 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The increased latex yield did not significantly decrease tree growth over three years.
Treatmentincrease of latex yield e0 Directiondid not result in a significant decrease e0 Qualifierover a period of three years e0 Verbatim
t0 “Hevea brasiliensis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–79 e0 “The increase of latex yield did not result in a significant decrease in the growth of trees over a period of three years. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–645 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Under severe stress, bacteroid proline catabolism had no significant effect on the drought-related seed yield decrease .
Outcomedrought imposed decrease in seed yield e0 Directionno significant effect e0 Qualifierwhen stress was severe e0 Verbatim
e0 “when stress was severe there was no significant effect of the ability of bacteroids to catabolize proline on drought imposed decrease in seed yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1451 e1 “When water stress was mild, soybean plants inoculated with bacteria unable to catabolize proline ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1173 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.