Search claims · PlantClaims

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each one percent increase of ET 0 applied by irrigation was associated with a 0.263 g increase in chicory shoot fresh mass.

Taxon: Cichorium intybusCichorium intybuse1
Treatment: percent of ET 0 applied by irrigatione2
Outcome: shoots' freshe2
Direction: increasede2
Value: 0.263e2
Setting: a greenhousee1

Verbatim

e1
“the chicory (Cichorium intybus L. cv. "Folha Larga") production, grown in a greenhouse”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–275

e2
“the increase in one percent of ET 0 applied by irrigation increased the plants height in 0.148 cm, and 0.263 and 0.0158 g in the shoots' fresh and dry mass (respectively) and decrease in 0.306 cm 2 of the leaf area”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1450

Title

Chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) yield under water stress and estimation of leaf area using allometric relations

Rafael Dreux Miranda Fernandes; José Antonio Frizzone; Jefferson Vieira José Australian Journal of Crop Science 2017. doi:10.21475/ajcs.17.11.12.pne697

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growing barley in Tuva increased the accumulation of fat and ﬁber in grain, by 24 and 48% respectively.

Taxon: barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Treatment: growing plants in the Republic of Tuvae2
Outcome: accumulation of fat and ﬁbere4
Direction: increasee4
Value: 24 and 48%e4
Comparator: Republic of Khakassiae2

Not reportedSetting

Verbatim

e0
“The following varieties of spring chaffy barley of Siberian breeding were used as an object of the study”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 514–618

e2
“More stringent conditions for growing plants in the Republic of Tuva, compared to the Republic of Khakassia, caused a 20% decrease in the weight of 1000 grains and yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1072

e4
“an increase in the accumulation of fat and ﬁber in it (by 24 and 48%, respectively)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1205

Title

Content of valuable substances in barley grain grown under contrast climate conditions

A. V. Sumina; V. I. Polonskiy Siberian Herald of Agricultural Science 2020. doi:10.26898/0370-8799-2020-1-3

Other claims from this paper (6)

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogel at 100 g/tree under moderate irrigation increased orange fruit set and leaf relative water content.

Taxon: orange treese7
Treatment: 100g/tree hydrogele0
Outcome: fruit set, leaf relative water contente1
Direction: increasede0

Verbatim

e0
“applied organic plant residues at rate 6.5 kg/tree or 100g/tree hydrogel under moderate irrigation rate (T5 and T3) significantly increased the most growth parameters (canopy volume, number of shoots/branch and leaf area)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–1039

e1
“fruit set, leaf relative water content and decrease fruit drop%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1105

e7
“''Washington Navel'' orange trees grown on a sandy soil under drip irrigation system”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–779

Title

IMPACT OF CHEMICAL AND NATURAL WATER SAVING SOIL AMENDMENTS ON GROWTH, YIELD AND WATER USE EFFICIENCY OF ''WASHINGTON NAVEL'' ORANGE TREES UNDER DEFICIT IRRIGATION CONDITIONS

M.M.S. Abo El-Enien; E.A. Moursi Menoufia Journal of Plant Production 2019. doi:10.21608/mjppf.2019.174942

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Second-year LPC increased 20.11% at S1.

Taxon: potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment: S1e1
Outcome: LPCe0
Direction: increasee0
Value: 20.11e0
Qualifier: second year of experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The corresponding trend for the second year of experiment was 20.11, 25.21 and 26.06% increase for LPC, 7.46, 12.69 and 18.66 decrease for ψw, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1145

t0
“potato”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–134

e1
“Leaf proline content (LPC) increased by 38.87, 51.93 and 41.54% and leaf water potential (ψw) decreased by 20.95, 31.43 and 59.05% at S1, S2 and S3 compared with S0 in the first year of experiment, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–988

Title

Effects of different irrigation regimes and two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on some physiological characteristics and yield of potato under field conditions

Saman Khosravifar; Farhad Farahvash; Nasser Aliasgharzad; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2020. doi:10.1080/01904167.2020.1758133

Other claims from this paper (18)

Intervention effect First-year leaf proline increased 38.87% at S1 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf proline increased 51.93% at S2 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf proline increased 41.54% at S3 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf water potential decreased 20.95% at S1 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf water potential decreased 31.43% at S2 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf water potential decreased 59.05% at S3 versus S0.
Intervention effect Second-year LPC increased 25.21% at S2.
Intervention effect Second-year LPC increased 26.06% at S3.
Intervention effect Second-year ψw decreased 7.46 at S1.
Intervention effect Second-year ψw decreased 12.69 at S2.
Intervention effect Second-year ψw decreased 18.66 at S3.
Intervention effect Mean two-year tuber yield loss was 20.78% at S1 versus S0.
Intervention effect Mean two-year tuber yield loss was 36.46% at S2 versus S0.
Intervention effect Mean two-year tuber yield loss was 50.36% at S3 versus S0.
Intervention effect C. etunicatum treated plants had minimum LPC of 4.16 μmol g−1 FW.
Intervention effect R. intraradices inoculation increased tuber yield 36.00% in 2013.
Intervention effect R. intraradices inoculation increased tuber yield 32.48% in 2014.
Intervention effect R. intraradices inoculated plants had maximum root colonization of 54.20%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Second-year LPC increased 25.21% at S2.

Taxon: potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment: S2e1
Outcome: LPCe0
Direction: increasee0
Value: 25.21e0
Qualifier: second year of experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The corresponding trend for the second year of experiment was 20.11, 25.21 and 26.06% increase for LPC, 7.46, 12.69 and 18.66 decrease for ψw, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1145

t0
“potato”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–134

e1
“Leaf proline content (LPC) increased by 38.87, 51.93 and 41.54% and leaf water potential (ψw) decreased by 20.95, 31.43 and 59.05% at S1, S2 and S3 compared with S0 in the first year of experiment, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–988

Title

Effects of different irrigation regimes and two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on some physiological characteristics and yield of potato under field conditions

Saman Khosravifar; Farhad Farahvash; Nasser Aliasgharzad; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2020. doi:10.1080/01904167.2020.1758133

Other claims from this paper (18)

Intervention effect First-year leaf proline increased 38.87% at S1 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf proline increased 51.93% at S2 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf proline increased 41.54% at S3 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf water potential decreased 20.95% at S1 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf water potential decreased 31.43% at S2 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf water potential decreased 59.05% at S3 versus S0.
Intervention effect Second-year LPC increased 20.11% at S1.
Intervention effect Second-year LPC increased 26.06% at S3.
Intervention effect Second-year ψw decreased 7.46 at S1.
Intervention effect Second-year ψw decreased 12.69 at S2.
Intervention effect Second-year ψw decreased 18.66 at S3.
Intervention effect Mean two-year tuber yield loss was 20.78% at S1 versus S0.
Intervention effect Mean two-year tuber yield loss was 36.46% at S2 versus S0.
Intervention effect Mean two-year tuber yield loss was 50.36% at S3 versus S0.
Intervention effect C. etunicatum treated plants had minimum LPC of 4.16 μmol g−1 FW.
Intervention effect R. intraradices inoculation increased tuber yield 36.00% in 2013.
Intervention effect R. intraradices inoculation increased tuber yield 32.48% in 2014.
Intervention effect R. intraradices inoculated plants had maximum root colonization of 54.20%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Second-year LPC increased 26.06% at S3.

Taxon: potatoSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment: S3e1
Outcome: LPCe0
Direction: increasee0
Value: 26.06e0
Qualifier: second year of experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“The corresponding trend for the second year of experiment was 20.11, 25.21 and 26.06% increase for LPC, 7.46, 12.69 and 18.66 decrease for ψw, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1145

t0
“potato”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–134

e1
“Leaf proline content (LPC) increased by 38.87, 51.93 and 41.54% and leaf water potential (ψw) decreased by 20.95, 31.43 and 59.05% at S1, S2 and S3 compared with S0 in the first year of experiment, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–988

Title

Effects of different irrigation regimes and two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on some physiological characteristics and yield of potato under field conditions

Saman Khosravifar; Farhad Farahvash; Nasser Aliasgharzad; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2020. doi:10.1080/01904167.2020.1758133

Other claims from this paper (18)

Intervention effect First-year leaf proline increased 38.87% at S1 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf proline increased 51.93% at S2 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf proline increased 41.54% at S3 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf water potential decreased 20.95% at S1 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf water potential decreased 31.43% at S2 versus S0.
Intervention effect First-year leaf water potential decreased 59.05% at S3 versus S0.
Intervention effect Second-year LPC increased 20.11% at S1.
Intervention effect Second-year LPC increased 25.21% at S2.
Intervention effect Second-year ψw decreased 7.46 at S1.
Intervention effect Second-year ψw decreased 12.69 at S2.
Intervention effect Second-year ψw decreased 18.66 at S3.
Intervention effect Mean two-year tuber yield loss was 20.78% at S1 versus S0.
Intervention effect Mean two-year tuber yield loss was 36.46% at S2 versus S0.
Intervention effect Mean two-year tuber yield loss was 50.36% at S3 versus S0.
Intervention effect C. etunicatum treated plants had minimum LPC of 4.16 μmol g−1 FW.
Intervention effect R. intraradices inoculation increased tuber yield 36.00% in 2013.
Intervention effect R. intraradices inoculation increased tuber yield 32.48% in 2014.
Intervention effect R. intraradices inoculated plants had maximum root colonization of 54.20%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Qingtianza4 Pn decreased by 74.44% after ten days of waterlogging versus CK.

Taxon: Stevia rebaudinat0
Material: Qingtianza4e1
Treatment: waterlogging for 10de0
Outcome: Pne0
Direction: decreasede0
Value: 74.44%e0
Comparator: CKe0

Verbatim

e0
“And the Pn of different materials in treatment T2(waterlogging for 10d) showed maximum decrease,which decreased for 65.88%,78.51%,74.44%,71.68% and 59.58% than that of CK,respectively.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1073

e1
“the SPAD value of the IS-1,QF-1,Qingtianza4,JD-1 and AL-4 in the treatment Tb(waterlogging for 10 days) decreased for 21.29%,34.57%,27.84%,23.01% and 17.59% than that of CK,respectively.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–889

t0
“Stevia rebaudina”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–80

Title

Effects of Waterlogging on Photosynthesis and Dry Leaf Yield of Stevia rebaudina

Yan Shi Zhongguo tangliao 2012

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Five days of waterlogging did not significantly change SPAD, gas-exchange measures or dry leaf production in stevia.
Intervention effect IS-1 SPAD value decreased by 21.29% after ten days of waterlogging versus CK.
Intervention effect QF-1 SPAD value decreased by 34.57% after ten days of waterlogging versus CK.
Intervention effect Qingtianza4 SPAD value decreased by 27.84% after ten days of waterlogging versus CK.
Intervention effect JD-1 SPAD value decreased by 23.01% after ten days of waterlogging versus CK.
Intervention effect AL-4 SPAD value decreased by 17.59% after ten days of waterlogging versus CK.
Intervention effect IS-1 Pn decreased by 65.88% after ten days of waterlogging versus CK.
Intervention effect QF-1 Pn decreased by 78.51% after ten days of waterlogging versus CK.
Intervention effect JD-1 Pn decreased by 71.68% after ten days of waterlogging versus CK.
Intervention effect AL-4 Pn decreased by 59.58% after ten days of waterlogging versus CK.
Observation Gs and Tr followed a same trend relative to Pn during waterlogging.
Observation Ci followed a opposite trend relative to Pn during waterlogging.
Intervention effect Longer waterlogging reduced dry leaf yield per plant.
Observation Stevia materials varied in dry leaf yield decline and waterlogging tolerance.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

in light water stress and followed by continuing water stress,Pn decreased,ROS accumulated and the activity of SOD increased in leaves

Taxon: hybrid riceOryza sativat0 e1
Organ / stage: leavese0 e1
Treatment: light water stresse0 e1
Outcome: activity of SODe0 e1
Direction: increasede0 e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“in light water stress and followed by continuing water stress,Pn decreased,ROS accumulated and the activity of SOD increased in leaves”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 275–409

e1
“However,in severe water stress and followed by continuing water stress,Pn decreaded rapidly,the content ROS and the activity of SOD were higher than in light water stress,but at the 7～9 days the activity of SOD began to decrease”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–638

t0
“hybrid rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75

Title

Effect of water stress on photosynthesis and yield character of hybrid rice at different stages

Guotao Yang Ganhan diqu nongye yanjiu 2008

Other claims from this paper (11)

Intervention effect in light water stress and followed by continuing water stress,Pn decreased,ROS accumulated and the activity of SOD increased in leaves
Intervention effect in light water stress and followed by continuing water stress,Pn decreased,ROS accumulated and the activity of SOD increased in leaves
Intervention effect in severe water stress and followed by continuing water stress,Pn decreaded rapidly
Intervention effect the content ROS and the activity of SOD were higher than in light water stress
Intervention effect at the 7～9 days the activity of SOD began to decrease
Intervention effect After harvest,the magnitude of yield treated with different water stress is summarized as: CKlightsevere
Observation the results showed 6 different protein bands
Intervention effect Followed by increasing water stress degree,the light of protein band increased gradually
Observation It also showed difference in two varieties
Observation The ability of resistance to water stress at three stages were summarized as: Booting stage flowering stagetillering stage
Observation B-You 827 had higher resistance to both light and severe water stress compared to Gangyou 725 at three stages

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The mutant matjan gamma 20 showed an increase in the oleic:linoleic ratio compared with its parent.

Taxon: groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Material: matjan gamma 20e0
Treatment: gamma radiatione0
Outcome: oleic:linoleic ratioe1
Direction: increasee1
Comparator: parente1

Verbatim

e0
“The oil and protein compositions of a groundnut (Arachis hypogeae l.) mutant matjan gamma 20 induced by gamma radiation as well as the parent and three other genotypes were investigated”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–185

e1
“The mutant expressed several important improvements, over it parent including an increase in the oleic:linoleic ratio without increasing the behenic acid content, an increase on oil yield per kernel and an increase in tryptophan content without any decrease in protein content”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–463

Title

Oil and protein compositions of a groundnut (Arachis hypogaea l.) mutant matjan gamma 20

Caleb Cheah; N.H. Tan; H. T. Khor Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia) 1990

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect The mutant matjan gamma 20 did not show an increase in behenic acid content compared with its parent.
Intervention effect The mutant matjan gamma 20 showed an increase in oil yield per kernel compared with its parent.
Intervention effect The mutant matjan gamma 20 showed an increase in tryptophan content compared with its parent.
Intervention effect The mutant matjan gamma 20 showed no decrease in protein content compared with its parent.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High NO3 supply did not increase NO3 uptake of tomato in fall to winter cropping.

Taxon: TomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment: high NO3 supplye3
Outcome: uptake of NO3e3
Direction: did not increasee3
Setting: fall to winter croppinge3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“Tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. Momotaro) were cultured in nutrient solution supplying 35 meq or 50 meq of nitrate (NO3) per plant weekly from the flowering stage of the first truss in two cropping seasons”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–231

e3
“In the fall to winter cropping, however, high NO3 supply did not increase the uptake of NO3, but tended to decrease the rate of fruit set and marketable yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–748

Title

Effect of restricted supply of nitrate on fruit growth and nutrient concentrations in the petiole sap of tomato cultured hydroponically

Yiqing He; Satoshi Terabayashi; Tomotaka Asaka; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 1999. doi:10.1080/01904169909365672

Other claims from this paper (10)

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics