View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Maryot2 showed the highest seed yield decrease (21.51) under water deficit in the first season.
Outcomedecrease in seed yield e1 Qualifierin the first season e1 Verbatim
t0 “SOME FABA BEAN CULTIVARS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–72 e1 “Maryot2 cultivar recorded the highest decrease in seed yield (21.51) in the first season ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1529 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Climate change was associated with a significant average cotton yield efficiency decrease of 515 kg/ha.
Treatmentclimate change e1 Outcomeyield efficiency e0 Verbatim
t0 “Cotton Production ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–45 e0 “on the yield efficiency with an average decrease of 515 kg/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–884 e1 “climate change has a significant negative impact at 1% level ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–744 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Greater root surface area was associated with a smaller decrease in tuber yield under drought.
Outcomedecrease in tuber yield e0 Qualifierroot surface area e0 Verbatim
t0 “potato cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–60 e0 “The strongest correlations involved the root length and the root surface area with the decrease in tuber yield under the drought ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1225 e1 “the higher the value of the parameter, the smaller the observed decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1393 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The in vitro decrease matched the decrease in vivo during auxin-induced growth acceleration.
Outcomeyield threshold obtained in vivo ( Y ) e0 Comparatorauxin‐induced growth acceleration e0 Verbatim
e0 “to the same extent as the decrease of the yield threshold obtained in vivo ( Y ) with auxin‐induced growth acceleration of hypocotyl segments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–647 t0 “cowpea hypocotyl ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–121 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress decrease d bud number and flower yield .
Outcomenumber of buds and a decrease in flower yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Water stress caused a decrease in the number of buds and a decrease in flower yield . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–791 t0 “Miniature Rose Varieties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–68 Other claims from this paper (5) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The WP decrease under combined stress was attributed to a negative effect on grain yield .
Treatmentcombined stress e4 Qualifiernegative effect on grain yield e4 Verbatim
e4 “the decrease in WP under combined stress was attributed to the negative effect on grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1399 t0 “maize under deficit irrigation and salt stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–84 Other claims from this paper (11) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The polynomial model could not calculate a salinity yield decrease value.
Taxonvegetables, and ornamentals e1 Outcomecalculation of the salinity yield decrease (SYD) value is not possible e0 Comparatorpolynomial model e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The polynomial model has the drawback that calculation of the salinity yield decrease (SYD) value is not possible. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–790 e1 “various vegetables, and ornamentals were grown in a substrate system ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 95–163 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each 1% rise in biomass lignin was associated with an expected methane yield decrease of 7.49 LCH4 kgTS.
Qualifierincrease of 1% lignin content e0 Verbatim
e0 “The expected average decrease in methane yield is 7.49 LCH4 kgTS with an increase of 1% lignin content in biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–847 t0 “energy crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–39 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
CropSyst projected about a 15% decrease in cotton yield for 2070–2100 under SRES B1.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The CropSyst simulation under SRES B1, resulted in an increase by 6% for the period 2020-2050 and a decrease by about 15% in cotton yield for 2070-2100. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–958 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result mixed projected Claim · model-written summary
Spring barley yield was simulated to stagnate or decrease .
Directionstagnation or decrements e0 Verbatim
e0 “For spring barley and maize, however, yield stagnation or decrements were simulated. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–661 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.