View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association author interpretation original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield is projected to decrease under future climate conditions because of lower grain weight and ripened grain ratio.
future climate conditions e7 grain weight decreased by shorter grain filling period e7 Verbatim
t0 “Yield and Yield Components of Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–73 e7 “grain yield would decrease under future climate conditions due to grain weight decrease d by shorter grain filling period ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3083–3203 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The capacity of Myc to increase yield was not enough to compensate for the yield decrease caused by reduced fertilization.
reduced fertilization e7 Verbatim
e7 “In this experiment, the Myc’s capacity to increase yield was not enough to compensate for the yield decrease caused by reduced fertilization ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1451–1591 e5 “very few data on wether mycorrhizal inoculants affect soil biological activity and cereal growth in temperate climates ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–460 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal fungi compensated grain yield decrease by 29%.
applying mycorrhizal fungi e0 mycorrhizal fungi e0 symbiont grain yield decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Results showed that seed yield reduced the by 42% under weedy conditions and applying mycorrhizal fungi compensated the grain yield decrease by 29%. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–825 t0 “Sunflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 115–124 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Mango yield is projected to decrease by 92.53% under scenario A1.
scenarios A1 and B1, respectively e0 Verbatim
e0 “the yield of mango will decrease by 92.53% - 85.73% in the future periods under scenarios A1 and B1, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1105 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Mango yield is projected to decrease by 85.73% under scenario B1.
scenarios A1 and B1, respectively e0 Verbatim
e0 “the yield of mango will decrease by 92.53% - 85.73% in the future periods under scenarios A1 and B1, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1105 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Industrial tomato yield did not decrease at salinity up to 2.6 dS m(-1).
industrial tomatoes e0 salinity up to 2.6 dS m(-1) e0 without any decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “industrial tomatoes could be grown in salinity up to 2.6 dS m(-1) without any decrease in yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1022 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield enhancement coincided with a relative decrease in oat grain protein content of 11.3 to 12.4%.
Yield enhancement e0 protein content of oat grains e0 Verbatim
e0 “Yield enhancement was accompanied by a relative decrease of protein content of oat grains ranging from 11.3 to 12.4 % ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–955 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
When N and P were applied together without K, a severe antagonism resulted, with a large yield decrease .
N and P were applied together without K e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Valencia orange trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 71–92 e1 “When N and P were applied together without K, a severe antagonism resulted with large yield decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–798 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect Applied individually, N fertilizer gave a response of 6 per cent in Valencia orange. Intervention effect Applied individually, P fertilizer gave a response of 5 per cent in Valencia orange. Intervention effect Applied individually, K fertilizer gave a response of 23 per cent in Valencia orange. Intervention effect The total response to N, P and K applied simultaneously was 40 per cent, compared with 37 per cent predicted by sequential additivity and 34 per cent by simple addition. Intervention effect When N, P and K were applied together, the individual response to N was 8 in Valencia orange. Intervention effect When N, P and K were applied together, the individual response to P was 7 in Valencia orange. Intervention effect When N, P and K were applied together, the individual response to K was 26 in Valencia orange. Observation The interactions of K with P and of K with N were also sequentially additive. Intervention effect Adding K to the N plus P treatment resulted in a 69 per cent yield increase. Observation Potassium was a limiting factor only for N and P together, not for N or P individually. Recommendation The authors suggest an alternative procedure to DRIS analysis. Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The three perennial crops did not show a corresponding yield decrease with declining precipitation.
no corresponding decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Yield s of maize, cotton and soybean decrease d sharply with decreasing precipitation, but there was no corresponding decrease in yield of the three perennial biomass crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1360 t0 “mimosa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 Other claims from this paper (9) Method / resource observed original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
Median ensemble potato yield fell 2% for each 10% rainfall decrease at nonirrigated sites.
for every 10% decrease in rainfall (for nonirrigated sites) e0 Verbatim
e0 “declined 2% for every 10% decrease in rainfall (for nonirrigated sites) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1652–1723 e1 “yield increased on average 6% per 100-ppm C ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1624 t0 “potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 2–8 Other claims from this paper (16) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Oryza sativa
Helianthus annuus_from_India.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Mangifera indica
Avena sativa
Citrus sinensis
Mimosa
Solanum tuberosum