Search claims · PlantClaims

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The decrease in growth ultimately caused a decrease in wheat yield.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome: yielde5
Qualifier: This decrease in growthe5

Verbatim

t0
“Wheat Germplasm”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–29

e5
“This decrease in growth ultimately caused a decrease in yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–735

Title

Evaluation of Wheat Germplasm Against Salinity

Farida Begum; M Saifuzzaman; W Sultana Bangladesh Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research 1970. doi:10.3329/bjsir.v43i2.966

Other claims from this paper (4)

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield decrease at the tillering stage is mainly caused by a decrease in biological yield.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae4
Organ / stage: tillering stagee4
Outcome: decrease in the yield of the ricee4
Qualifier: decrease in its biological yielde4

Verbatim

e4
“The decrease in the yield of the rice at tillering stage is maily caused by the decrease in its biological yield while that at ear primordial stage is due to the decrease in its harvest index(HI)”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 576–773

Title

Effect of the Irrigation with Water Polluted by Diesel Oil at Two Rice Gr owth Stages on Rice Yield

Jinhu Wang Journal of Suzhou Railway Teachers College 2002

Other claims from this paper (5)

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield decrease at the ear primordial stage is due to a decrease in harvest index.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae4
Organ / stage: ear primordial stagee4
Outcome: decrease in the yield of the ricee4
Qualifier: decrease in its harvest index(HI)e4

Verbatim

e4
“The decrease in the yield of the rice at tillering stage is maily caused by the decrease in its biological yield while that at ear primordial stage is due to the decrease in its harvest index(HI)”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 576–773

Title

Effect of the Irrigation with Water Polluted by Diesel Oil at Two Rice Gr owth Stages on Rice Yield

Jinhu Wang Journal of Suzhou Railway Teachers College 2002

Other claims from this paper (5)

Mechanismobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced pod number accounted for the yield decrease.

Taxon: soybeansGlycine maxt0
Outcome: decrease in seed yielde0
Qualifier: decrease in number of pods per plante0

Verbatim

e0
“The decrease in seed yield observed in both experimentsmore » was due to a decrease in number of pods per plant”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1164–1275

t0
“soybeans”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–103

Title

Comparison of experimental designs to determine effects of acidic precipitation on field-grown soybeans

Levi Evans; Keith F. Lewin; M Patti; et al. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) 1982

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Simulated acidic rain at pH 4.1 reduced soybean seed yield by 10.7 relative to pH 5.6.
Intervention effect Simulated acidic rain at pH 3.3 reduced soybean seed yield by 16.8 relative to pH 5.6.
Intervention effect Simulated acidic rain at pH 2.7 reduced soybean seed yield by 22.9% relative to pH 5.6.
Association Seed yield had a strong positive relation with rain pH in the first experiment.
Intervention effect In the unshielded experiment, pH 4.1 reduced soybean yield by 2.7 relative to pH 5.6.
Intervention effect In the unshielded experiment, pH 3.3 reduced soybean yield by 7.0 relative to pH 5.6.
Intervention effect In the unshielded experiment, pH 2.7 reduced soybean yield by 7.6 relative to pH 5.6.
Association In the second experiment seed mass rose with rain pH with a correlation coefficient of 0.97.

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit growth tended to decrease over years, probably because of higher yield loads.

Taxon: applesMalus domesticat0
Outcome: fruit growth to decrease over yearse0
Direction: decreasee0
Qualifier: increased yield loadse0

Verbatim

e0
“The tendency for fruit growth to decrease over years was probably due to increased yield loads.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–765

t0
“apples”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–28

Title

Growth and quality of apples as affected by different irrigation treatments

J. De V. Lötter; D. J. Beukes; H. W. Weber Journal of Horticultural Science 1985. doi:10.1080/14620316.1985.11515617

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Fruit circumference growth increased linearly with TAW level in phases 2 and 3.
Observation Most total fruit growth was completed during phase 2.
Observation Most shoot extension growth was completed during phase 1.
Intervention effect Shoot growth was more vigorous at 85% TAW than 25% TAW during phase 2.
Observation At 85% and 65% TAW, trunk growth was completed mainly at the end of phase 2.
Observation At 45% and 25% TAW, trunk growth was completed by the end of phase 1.
Association Trunk growth correlated positively with water application in phases 1 and 2 and slightly in phase 3.
Intervention effect Lower TAW during main fruit development reduced apple fruit size.
Recommendation Growers should favor 85% TAW in phases 2 and 3.
Intervention effect Watercore worsened as TAW increased.
Intervention effect Sunburn increased strongly as TAW decreased.
Intervention effect Superficial scald varied with irrigation treatment, though the result was difficult to interpret.
Association Scald incidence tended to correlate positively with TAW in phases 3 and 4.
Intervention effect Bitter pit occurrence increased with higher TAW during every phase.

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer maturation restricted the decrease in grain yield under stress.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome: decrease in grain yielde0
Qualifier: under stress conditionse0
Comparator: sensitive cultivare0

Verbatim

e0
“thus restricting heavy decrease in grain yield, under stress conditions, as compared to the sensitive cultivar”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1595

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52

Title

Stem Reserve Mobilization and Sink Activity in Wheat under Drought Conditions

Anil K. Gupta; Kamaljit Kaur; Narinder Kaur American Journal of Plant Sciences 2011. doi:10.4236/ajps.2011.21010

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Drought significantly reduced internode biomass of the sensitive cultivar relative to the tolerant one.
Observation Mobilized dry matter was higher in tolerant internodes under control and stress.
Observation Mobilization efficiency was higher in tolerant internodes under control and stress.
Observation Stem reserve translocation to grain was enhanced in tolerant plants.
Observation Water soluble carbohydrates were higher in tolerant internodes.
Intervention effect Drought mobilized fructans more effectively from tolerant internodes.
Observation Tolerant grains had significantly higher sucrose synthase activity under drought.
Observation Sensitive grains matured earlier than tolerant grains under control and stress.
Mechanism Longer maturation in tolerant plants supported stem reserve mobilization.

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Water yield could decrease due to greater evapotranspiration from the crops.

Taxon: switchgrass and MiscanthusPanicum virgatumMiscanthuse0
Outcome: Water yielde0
Direction: decreasee0
Qualifier: higher evapotranspiration (ET) ratee0

Verbatim

e0
“Water yield would potentially decrease because of higher evapotranspiration (ET) rate from switchgrass and Miscanthus”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2394–2511

Title

Biomass Production and Hydrological/Water Quality Impacts of Perennial Crop Production on Marginal Land

Qingyu Feng Purdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System) 2013

Other claims from this paper (13)

Observation The watershed contains 641 km2 of marginal land, 23% of its area.
Observation Converting all marginal land to switchgrass could produce 45 million gallons of bioethanol.
Observation Converting all marginal land to Miscanthus could produce 57 million gallons of bioethanol.
Observation Switchgrass production would not support the assumed 50 million gallon biorefinery.
Observation Miscanthus production could support the assumed 50 million gallon biorefinery.
Intervention effect Conversion to the two crops significantly affected hydrology and water quality at marginal land scale.
Observation At watershed scale, the hydrologic and water quality impact could be insignificant.
Association Switchgrass has greater total ET loss than Miscanthus because of non-growing-season evaporation.
Intervention effect Soil erosion would fall under switchgrass and Miscanthus conversion.
Intervention effect Mineral and organic nitrogen and phosphorus would fall with reduced fertilization for biomass production.
Intervention effect Early-season nitrogen in surface and subsurface flow tended to rise following conversion of grass and forest land.
Association Miscanthus reduced soil erosion more than switchgrass.
Association Miscanthus reduced nutrient loss more than switchgrass.

Mechanismobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield decrease lowered total grain protein production per crop.

Taxon: RiceOryza sativat0
Outcome: total grain protein production per crope0
Direction: lowerse0
Qualifier: decrease in grain yielde0

Verbatim

e0
“This decrease in grain yield consequently lowers the total grain protein production per crop.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–310

t0
“Rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–45

Title

Effect of Simazine on Protein Content of Rice Grain (Oryza sativa L.)

B. S. Vergara; M. Miller; E. Avelino Agronomy Journal 1970. doi:10.2134/agronj1970.00021962006200020028x

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Simazine applied at flowering increased grain protein percentage.
Intervention effect Simazine applied at flowering decreased grain yield.
Mechanism Increased sterility was attributed as the cause of reduced grain yield.
Intervention effect Simazine increased nitrogen content of blades, sheaths plus culms, and roots in young rice plants.
Mechanism The nitrogen percentage increase did not result from increased plant nitrogen uptake.
Mechanism Reduced dry weight accounted for increased nitrogen percentage.

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Sunshine decrease and warming were identified as main causes of maize yield decline.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Treatment: sunshine duration decrease and the temperature risee0
Outcome: maize yield declininge0

Verbatim

e0
“indicating that the sunshine duration decrease and the temperature rise are the main causes of the maize yield declining.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1659

Title

The contribution of climate change to the crop phenology and yield in Haihe River Basin

HU Sh Geographical Research 2014

Other claims from this paper (12)

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The decrease in maize yield with rising temperature could be attributed to a shorter crop duration.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Treatment: increase in temperaturee0
Outcome: maize yielde0
Qualifier: decrease in duration of the crope0

Verbatim

e0
“The decrease in maize yield due to increase in temperature could be attributed to decrease in duration of the crop”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1203

Title

Potential impact of future climate change on maize (Zea mays L.) under rainfed condition in central India

ROHIT PATIDAR; M. MOHANTY; NISHANT K. SINHA; et al. Journal of Agrometeorology 2021. doi:10.54386/jam.v22i1.117

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect In simulation, raising temperature from the base to 5 degrees C decreased maize grain yield by 40%.
Intervention effect In simulation, raising temperature from the base to 5 degrees C decreased maize biomass yield by 28%.
Intervention effect In simulation, a 1 degree C temperature increase could reduce maize grain yield by 10%.
Intervention effect In simulation, a 1 degree C temperature increase could reduce maize biomass yield by 8%.
Intervention effect In simulation, a 10% decrease of rainfall from the base gave a small increase in maize yield.
Intervention effect In simulation, a rainfall increase of 10% or more, or a decrease of more than 20%, resulted in lower maize yield and biomass.
Intervention effect In simulation, a one-degree temperature increase may shorten crop duration by 4.3 days.
Intervention effect Delaying sowing dates could reduce the impact of climate change on crop yield to a considerable extent.
Recommendation Adopting a sowing date between 7th and 14th July may reduce the impact of temperature change on maize grain and biomass yield in central India.

“yield decrease”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics