View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
cotton yield decrease decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “For cotton, a rising water table from 2–3 m to 1–2 m and less than 1 m gave a yield decrease of about 11 and 60% respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–943 e1 “Fordwah Eastern Sadiqia South (FESS) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–207 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
cotton yield decrease decrease .
Verbatim
e0 “For cotton, a rising water table from 2–3 m to 1–2 m and less than 1 m gave a yield decrease of about 11 and 60% respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–943 e1 “Fordwah Eastern Sadiqia South (FESS) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–207 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
When soil water potential continued to decrease , no longer obvious decrease in yield was observed.
TreatmentSWP continued to be decreased e6 Directionno longer obvious decrease e6 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Yield and Quality of Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–52 e2 “the yield of two cultivars was decrease d significantly before heading stages,especially at panicle formation stage by lower SWP ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–558 e6 “but no longer obvious decrease was observed when SWP continued to be decrease d ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–637 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Combined drought and heat gave the largest tuber yield decrease .
Directionlargest decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The largest decrease was recorded in the case of applying both stresses simultaneously ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–998 t0 “potato plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–40 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect author interpretation review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Temperatures above optimum decrease cotton yield .
Treatmentincrease in temperatures above optimum e0 Verbatim
e0 “In contrast, increase in temperatures above optimum decrease cotton yield due to increased boll abscission and smaller boll size. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–454 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salt stress caused a linear decrease in paddy yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–110 e0 “Salt stress induced a linear decrease in biological and paddy yield and total plant biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–688 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salt stress caused a linear decrease in biological yield .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–110 e0 “Salt stress induced a linear decrease in biological and paddy yield and total plant biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–688 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Also assuming uniform synthesis efficiency caused an additional 4% decrease in simulated yield .
Treatmentassuming that Y g also was uniform e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “assuming that Y g also was uniform led to an additional decrease of 4% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1579 t0 “Sorghum Grain Yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–34 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Vegetative-stage ozone exposure caused no significant fruit yield decrease at final harvest.
TreatmentO 3 exposure at the vegetative stage e0 Directionno significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “O 3 exposure at the vegetative stage, there was no significant decrease in fruit yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 733–819 t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Elevated temperature was projected to decrease future soybean yield .
Treatmentelevated temperature e0 QualifierFor the period from 2081 to 2100 e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “For the period from 2081 to 2100, soybean yield was projected to decrease due to elevated temperature ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–913 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.