View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Sulphur dioxide did not decrease alfalfa yield under any of the conditions studied.
sulphur dioxide treatment e0 yield of alfalfa e0 no_change inferred e0 under none of the conditions studied e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each additional inch of rain caused a greater average wheat yield decrease in 1854–77 than across 1854–1918.
manured solely in the autumn e0 Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden t0 Verbatim
e0 “In the years 1854–77, when plots were manured solely in the autumn, the average decrease in yield caused by each additional inch of rain is greater than the average decrease from 1854–1918 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–355 t0 “wheat at Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–120 Other claims from this paper (1) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The nitrogen percentage of barley grain showed a progressive decrease not explained by rainfall, sowing date or yield .
barley grain t0 percentage of nitrogen e5 cannot be accounted for by changes in any of the above factors e5 Verbatim
t0 “the barley grain of Hoosfield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–79 e5 “there is a progressive decrease in the percentage of nitrogen which cannot be accounted for by changes in any of the above factors, and which may well be due to varietal improvement ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–571 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Under severe drought, leaf and stalk injury reduced yield less than in normal seasons.
leaf and stalk injuries e0 did not result in as great a decrease e0 normal seasons e0 Verbatim
e0 “Severe drouth in 1930 caused moisture to become the limiting factor so that leaf and stalk injuries did not result in as great a decrease in yield as in normal seasons ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2452–2619 t0 “corn plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–85 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Under some conditions sulphur dioxide significantly increased alfalfa yield .
sulphur dioxide e0 under some of the conditions e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515 e1 “under some of the conditions it brought about significant yield increases ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–662 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Under most conditions sulphur dioxide had no significant effect on alfalfa yield .
sulphur dioxide e0 no significant effect e1 under most of the conditions e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515 e1 “under most of the conditions it had no significant effect on yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–583 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Plant age and the amount of supplied nutrients had no effect on the alfalfa yield response to sulphur dioxide.
amount of supplied nutrients e1 yield response to the gas treatment e1 Age of plants and the amount of supplied nutrients e1 Verbatim
e0 “Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515 e1 “Age of plants and the amount of supplied nutrients had no effect on the yield response to the gas treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–905 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Sulphur dioxide treatment significantly increased the total sulphur content of alfalfa.
sulphur dioxide e1 per cent total sulphur e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515 e1 “treatment with sulphur dioxide brought about significant increases in per cent total sulphur ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1505 Other claims from this paper (9) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Sulphur deficiency in the nutrient supply was compensated by sulphur dioxide absorbed from the air in alfalfa.
sulphur dioxide e1 deficiencies in sulphur content of nutrient supply e1 Verbatim
e0 “Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515 e1 “deficiencies in sulphur content of nutrient supply were made up by absorption of sulphur dioxide from the air ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–796 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Neither sulphur dioxide, water supply nor sulphur content of the nutrient supply affected alfalfa nitrogen content.
sulphur dioxide e1 nitrogen content e1 no_change inferred e1 water supply, nor sulphur content of nutrient supply e1 Verbatim
e0 “Under none of the conditions studied did sulphur dioxide treatment decrease the yield of alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–515 e1 “neither sulphur dioxide, water supply, nor sulphur content of nutrient supply had significant effect on nitrogen content of the alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1785 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Medicago sativae0
Triticum aestivum.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Hordeum vulgare
Zea mays subsp. mays