View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In the no-reduction yield type after nitrogen decrease , the number of big and small vascular bundles of panicle necks and penultimate internodes in a stem did not differ significantly.
Treatmentnitrogen decrease treatment e2 Outcomenumber of big and small vascular bundles of panicle necks and penultimate internodes in a stem e1 Verbatim
e1 “there was not significant differences in the number of big and small vascular bundles of panicle necks and penultimate internodes in a stem ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2073–2212 e2 “After nitrogen decrease treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1784–1817 e0 “erect panicle type rice variety ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–132 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In the no-reduction yield type after nitrogen decrease , the area of big vascular bundles of penultimate internodes (per stem and per plant) and the number of stems and branches did not differ significantly.
Treatmentnitrogen decrease treatment e2 Outcomearea of big vascular bundles of penultimate internodes in a stem and in a plant, and number of stems and branches e1 Verbatim
e1 “the area of big vascular bundles of penultimate internodes in a stem and in a plant, and number of stems and branches ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2214–2331 e2 “After nitrogen decrease treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1784–1817 e0 “erect panicle type rice variety ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 101–132 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result not significant (as stated) projected Claim · model-written summary
Days to flowering and days to maturity may decrease in the 2030s and 2050s under both RCP4.5 and RCP8.5, relative to the simulated baseline period 1981-2010, but the decrease is not statistically significant.
TreatmentRCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios e4 Outcomedays to flowering and days to maturity e4 Comparatorsimulated values for the baseline period (1981–2010) e4 SettingAmhara Region, Ethiopia t0 Verbatim
t0 “Future climate change impacts on common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) phenology and yield with crop management options in Amhara Region, Ethiopia ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–144 e4 “The impact analysis showed that both days to flowering and days to maturity may decrease in 2030s and 2050s at both sites and under both RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios as compared to the simulated values for the baseline period (1981–2010) but the decrease is not statistically significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1692 Other claims from this paper (15) Association author interpretation original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Genotypes without a significant photosynthetic decrease may not have reached technical maturity.
Organ / stagetechnical maturity e0 Outcometechnical maturity e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “As regards the genotypes for which photosynthesis did not reduce significantly, it may be assumed that such plants had not reached technical maturity. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–750 t0 “hops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–53 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Heat stress did not significantly reduce days to 50% flowering.
Outcomenumber of days required for flowering of 50 % of plants e0 DirectionNo significant decrease e0 Settingconditions of heat stress e0 Verbatim
e0 “No significant decrease on the number of days required for flowering of 50 % of plants under conditions of heat stress were recorded ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2240–2372 t0 “TOMATO PLANTS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 168–181 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Heading rate of Huang Huazhan showed no change across leaf development stages.
Taxondirect seeding rice e1 Treatmentleaf development stage e5 Directionno_change inferred e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “To determine the optimal drying period for direct seeding rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–71 e5 “Shuyou 217 exhibited a decrease in heading rate with increasing leaf development stage, whereas Huang Huazhan showed no significant difference ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–1001 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Sealicit did not significantly change the inherent pod shatter resistance of resistant UFUS 7415.
TreatmentSealicit TM application e0 Outcomeinherent pod shatter resistance e0 Directiondid not significantly alter e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Sealicit TM application to the SR variety did not significantly alter its inherent pod shatter resistance ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1246 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 e1 “Sealicit TM application to the SR variety did not significantly alter its inherent pod shatter resistance ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1246 e2 “SS variety demonstrated a significant decrease in pod shattering ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–998 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.