View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Using SNP subsets based on functional annotation did not significantly decrease chickpea grain- yield prediction accuracy.
Outcomeprediction accuracy for grain yield e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Comparatorwhole SNP dataset e0 Not reported Value
Verbatim
e0 “Compared with the whole SNP dataset, a subset of SNPs did not significantly decrease prediction accuracy for grain yield despite consisting of a smaller number of SNPs. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1840 e1 “chickpea breeding lines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 333–356 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Using uncorrelated SNPs may reduce dataset dimensions.
Outcomedata set dimensions e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “perennial ryegrass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–65 e0 “allowing for a potential decrease of the data set dimensions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–876 Other claims from this paper (8) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The method decrease d the relative ratio of chloroplast DNA.
Outcomerelative ratio of chloroplast DNA e0 Comparatorseeds using the IMP Boom method e0 Verbatim
e0 “DNA extracted from seeds using the IMP Boom method showed an increase in the percentage of the nuclear genome with a decrease in the relative ratio of chloroplast DNA ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1556 e1 “soybean seeds ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–688 Other claims from this paper (9) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Models accounting for enviromic information decrease d error variance.
Treatmentmodels accounting to the enviromics information e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “models accounting to the enviromics information led to an increase of genetic variance and a decrease in the error variance ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–763 e1 “Breeding for dry matter yield and persistence in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–77 Other claims from this paper (11) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Adding GWAS-identified SNPs and NIRS data tended to reduce prediction accuracy within and across cycles.
Outcomeprediction accuracy e0 Qualifierboth within and between breeding cycles e0 Not reported Taxon Material Gene Compound Organ / stage Interactor Interactor role Second interactor Second interactor role Treatment Comparator Setting Value
Verbatim
e0 “incorporating significant SNP markers identified by GWAS and NIRS data into the models tended to decrease prediction accuracy both within and between breeding cycles ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1095–1260 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
OCS predicted mean cooking time reduction of 9.3%.
Verbatim
e0 “Progeny were predicted by OCS to increase in mean GY by 12.4%, decrease in mean CKT by 9.3%, and increase in mean Fe and Zn content by 6.9 and 4.6%, respectively, with low achieved coancestry of 0.032. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1431 t0 “common beans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–154 Other claims from this paper (13) Method / resource observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
OCS predicted mean grain yield gain of 12.4%.
Verbatim
e0 “Progeny were predicted by OCS to increase in mean GY by 12.4%, decrease in mean CKT by 9.3%, and increase in mean Fe and Zn content by 6.9 and 4.6%, respectively, with low achieved coancestry of 0.032. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1431 t0 “common beans ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 142–154 Other claims from this paper (13) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The optimum annealing temperature for the four Lr genes in the multiplex PCR was 61°C.
Outcomeoptimum annealing temperature e1 Verbatim
e0 “Leaf rust is a fungal disease in wheat that causes significant decrease in yield around the world ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–97 e1 “We found that the optimum annealing temperature for all four genes was 61°C ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1272 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The method increased the percentage of nuclear genome reads.
Outcomepercentage of the nuclear genome e0 Comparatorseeds using the IMP Boom method e0 Verbatim
e0 “DNA extracted from seeds using the IMP Boom method showed an increase in the percentage of the nuclear genome with a decrease in the relative ratio of chloroplast DNA ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1556 e1 “soybean seeds ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–688 Other claims from this paper (9) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Models accounting for enviromic information increased genetic variance.
Treatmentmodels accounting to the enviromics information e0 Outcomegenetic variance e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “models accounting to the enviromics information led to an increase of genetic variance and a decrease in the error variance ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–763 e1 “Breeding for dry matter yield and persistence in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–77 Other claims from this paper (11) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.