View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The mean yield of the 28 spring wheat crosses decrease d by 0.23% per 1% decrease in heterozygosity.
Treatmentdecrease in heterozygosity e1 Outcomemean yield of the 28 crosses e1 Verbatim
e0 “Eight adapted high‐ yield ing spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) parents ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–72 e1 “The mean yield of the 28 crosses decrease d at a linear rate of 0.23% per 1% decrease in heterozygosity with a maximum rate of 0.4% in one cross ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1465 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The maximum rate of yield decrease with heterozygosity was 0.4% in one spring wheat cross.
Treatmentheterozygosity e1 Directiondecrease inferred e1 Verbatim
e0 “Eight adapted high‐ yield ing spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) parents ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–72 e1 “The mean yield of the 28 crosses decrease d at a linear rate of 0.23% per 1% decrease in heterozygosity with a maximum rate of 0.4% in one cross ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1322–1465 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The observed decrease in yield from negative selection was generally greater than predicted.
Treatmentnegative selection e5 Outcomethe observed decrease e6 Directiongenerally greater e6 Qualifier0.00 to ‒17.65% e6 Comparatorthat predicted e6 Verbatim
t0 “Response to Selection for Protein and Yield in Peas ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–74 e5 “The observed decrease (‒0.75 to ‒7.05%) in the same trait for negative selection was generally greater than that predicted (‒2.18 to ‒4.62%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1075 e6 “The relationship between observed increase in yield from selection (3.22 to 12.53%) and that predicted (0.00 to 19.25%) was variable, but the observed decrease (‒1.93 to ‒17.25%) was generally greater than that predicted 0.00 to ‒17.65%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1314 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The observed decrease from negative selection for protein was generally greater than predicted.
Treatmentnegative selection e5 OutcomeThe observed decrease e5 Directiongenerally greater e5 Qualifier‒2.18 to ‒4.62% e5 Comparatorthat predicted e5 Verbatim
t0 “Response to Selection for Protein and Yield in Peas ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–74 e5 “The observed decrease (‒0.75 to ‒7.05%) in the same trait for negative selection was generally greater than that predicted (‒2.18 to ‒4.62%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1075 Other claims from this paper (10) Mechanism hypothesis original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The wheat rate of yield decrease with heterozygosity was below the lowest rate reported in maize, suggesting less dominance genetic variance in these materials.
Outcomedominance genetic variance e1 Qualifierless than the lowest reported in maize e1 Verbatim
e0 “Eight adapted high‐ yield ing spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) parents ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–72 e1 “Even this maximum rate was less than the lowest reported in maize (Zea mays L.) suggesting lesser amounts of dominance genetic variance in these materials ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1467–1622 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
The change in induced variation between M2 and M3 depended on trait and variety.
Outcomesize of induced variation e0 Directionincrease or decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “increase or decrease in the size of induced variation from M2 to M3 varied with the character and the variety ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–743 e1 “Oryza sativa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–118 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
5-aminouracil increased aberration yield in irradiated dry crepis seeds.
Organ / stagedry crepis seeds e0 Outcomeyield of aberrations e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The modification of the cytogenetic effect of x-radiation of dry crepis seeds (10 and 15 kR) by 5-aminouracil consisted of a higher yield of aberrations without decrease in share of exchanges of the chromosome type. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–466 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
5-aminouracil did not reduce the share of chromosome type exchanges in irradiated dry crepis seeds.
Outcomeshare of exchanges of the chromosome type e0 Directionwithout decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The modification of the cytogenetic effect of x-radiation of dry crepis seeds (10 and 15 kR) by 5-aminouracil consisted of a higher yield of aberrations without decrease in share of exchanges of the chromosome type. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–466 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Additive variance decrease d in selected Stiff Stalk Synthetic, approaching the 10% probability level.
MaterialStiff Stalk Synthetic e0 Outcomeestimates of σ 2 A e1 Qualifierapproached the 10% probability level e0 Verbatim
t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–91 e0 “The estimates for Stiff Stalk Synthetic showed a decrease from the CO to the C4 , which approached the 10% probability level. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1206 e1 “There was no difference in the estimates of σ 2 A for the CO and C4 Corn Borer Synthetic No. 1 populations. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1080 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Maize selection showed no response at generation 13.
Outcomeabsence of response e0 Qualifierat generation 13 e0 Verbatim
e0 “absence of response at generation 13 and decrease in yield from generation 17 onwards ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 92–177 t0 “Zea mays 'Hays Golden' ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–90 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.