Paper · 2010

Genotype environment interaction of yield components, yield, and aroma in aromatic new plant type (NPT) promising rice lines

Angelita Puji Lestari

14
claims
29
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ANGELITA PUJI LESTARI. Genotype Environment Interaction of Yield Components, Yield, and Aroma in Aromatic New Plant Type (NPT) Promising Rice Lines. Under supervision of HAJRIAL ASWIDINNOOR (Chairman), BUANG ABDULLAH, and AHMAD JUNAEDI (members of advisory committee). Quality of rice grain is determined by physical appearance and chemical content of the grain. Generally, consumers prefer good quality rice grain. Therefore, rice breeding program will focus on not only quantity, but also on quality of rice grains. Good quality of rice grains in the market is identified by consumers from their aroma and taste. The objectives of this research were to evaluate the level of grain yield and aromatic character of rice grain of breeding lines, to study the stability of yielding ability aromatic character, and yield potential of NPT lines in response to different environmental condition. The study was conducted from July 2009 through April 2010, at two planting seasons (2009 DS and 2009/2010 WS), in two locations, Bogor (200 m ASL) and Pusakanagara (8 m ASL). The design used was Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD), with three replications. The study tested 35 NPT aromatic lines and two varieties Ciherang and Sintanur as check varieties. The 21 day-old seedlings were planted one seed per hole, at a spacing of 20 cm x 20 cm. The size of experiment plots planted to NPT lines was 2 x 5 m per line. Stability of all characters was analyzed using regression coefficient (bi), average value of yield and AMMI. Aroma was analyzed by using three methods, namely: leaf aroma with KOH, rice aroma test in the test tube, and cooked rice. Crops protection against pests and diseases were controlled optimally. Coefficient of genetic variation (CGV), heritability, and genetic advance were high for productive tillers, number of filled and total grain per panicle. There was a positive correlation between those characters and grain yields. There were lines yielded more than Ciherang, but mostly did not differ significantly, i.e. IPB 116-F 3-1, IPB 116-F 46-1, IPB 117-F 14-2, IPB 117-F 174 and MR-B11738-1-2-Si -1-2. Stability analysis of Finlay-Wilkinson and AMMI did not show the same results of lines stability. Four lines that were aromatic identified by different methods, were: IPB 140-F-6, B11249-9C-PN-3-3-2-2-MR1, B11742-RS*2-3-MR-34-1-2-1, and B11955-MR-84-1-4. Lines which parents were introduced from the high altitude of South Sulawesi did not show consistent aroma when tested using different aroma testing methods. All lines tested had good grain quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coefficient of genetic variation, heritability and genetic advance were high for productive tillers, filled grains and total grains per panicle.

Outcome
Coefficient of genetic variation (CGV), heritability, and genetic advancee0
Qualifier
high for productive tillers, number of filled and total grain per paniclee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“promising rice lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–124 · show in text ↑
e0

“Coefficient of genetic variation (CGV), heritability, and genetic advance were high for productive tillers, number of filled and total grain per panicle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1714–1866 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield components showed a positive correlation with grain yield.

Organ / stage
paniclee0
Outcome
grain yieldse1
Direction
positive correlatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“promising rice lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–124 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was a positive correlation between those characters and grain yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1868–1942 · show in text ↑
e0

“Coefficient of genetic variation (CGV), heritability, and genetic advance were high for productive tillers, number of filled and total grain per panicle”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1714–1866 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Line IPB 116-F 3-1 yielded more than Ciherang, mostly without a significant difference.

Material
IPB 116-F 3-1e2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
yielded moree2
Comparator
Ciherange2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“promising rice lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–124 · show in text ↑
e2

“There were lines yielded more than Ciherang, but mostly did not differ significantly, i.e. IPB 116-F 3-1, IPB 116-F 46-1, IPB 117-F 14-2, IPB 117-F 174 and MR-B11738-1-2-Si -1-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1944–2121 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Line IPB 116-F 46-1 yielded more than Ciherang, mostly without a significant difference.

Material
IPB 116-F 46-1e2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
yielded moree2
Comparator
Ciherange2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“promising rice lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–124 · show in text ↑
e2

“There were lines yielded more than Ciherang, but mostly did not differ significantly, i.e. IPB 116-F 3-1, IPB 116-F 46-1, IPB 117-F 14-2, IPB 117-F 174 and MR-B11738-1-2-Si -1-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1944–2121 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Line IPB 117-F 14-2 yielded more than Ciherang, mostly without a significant difference.

Material
IPB 117-F 14-2e2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
yielded moree2
Comparator
Ciherange2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“promising rice lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–124 · show in text ↑
e2

“There were lines yielded more than Ciherang, but mostly did not differ significantly, i.e. IPB 116-F 3-1, IPB 116-F 46-1, IPB 117-F 14-2, IPB 117-F 174 and MR-B11738-1-2-Si -1-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1944–2121 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Line IPB 117-F 174 yielded more than Ciherang, mostly without a significant difference.

Material
IPB 117-F 174e2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
yielded moree2
Comparator
Ciherange2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“promising rice lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–124 · show in text ↑
e2

“There were lines yielded more than Ciherang, but mostly did not differ significantly, i.e. IPB 116-F 3-1, IPB 116-F 46-1, IPB 117-F 14-2, IPB 117-F 174 and MR-B11738-1-2-Si -1-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1944–2121 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Line MR-B11738-1-2-Si -1-2 yielded more than Ciherang, mostly without a significant difference.

Material
MR-B11738-1-2-Si -1-2e2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
yielded moree2
Comparator
Ciherange2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“promising rice lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–124 · show in text ↑
e2

“There were lines yielded more than Ciherang, but mostly did not differ significantly, i.e. IPB 116-F 3-1, IPB 116-F 46-1, IPB 117-F 14-2, IPB 117-F 174 and MR-B11738-1-2-Si -1-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1944–2121 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Finlay-Wilkinson and AMMI stability analyses did not give the same ranking of line stability.

Outcome
lines stabilitye3
Direction
did not show the same resultse3
Comparator
Finlay-Wilkinsone3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“promising rice lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–124 · show in text ↑
e3

“Stability analysis of Finlay-Wilkinson and AMMI did not show the same results of lines stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2123–2219 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lines whose parents came from high altitude in South Sulawesi did not show consistent aroma across aroma testing methods.

Material
Lines which parents were introduced from the high altitude of South Sulawesie4
Treatment
different aroma testing methodse4
Outcome
aromae4
Direction
did not show consistente4
Setting
South Sulawesie4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“promising rice lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–124 · show in text ↑
e4

“Lines which parents were introduced from the high altitude of South Sulawesi did not show consistent aroma when tested using different aroma testing methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2378–2534 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Line IPB 140-F-6 was identified as aromatic by different methods.

Material
IPB 140-F-6e5
Outcome
aromatice5
Qualifier
identified by different methodse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“promising rice lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–124 · show in text ↑
e5

“Four lines that were aromatic identified by different methods, were: IPB 140-F-6, B11249-9C-PN-3-3-2-2-MR1, B11742-RS*2-3-MR-34-1-2-1, and B11955-MR-84-1-4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2221–2376 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Line B11249-9C-PN-3-3-2-2-MR1 was identified as aromatic by different methods.

Material
B11249-9C-PN-3-3-2-2-MR1e5
Outcome
aromatice5
Qualifier
identified by different methodse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“promising rice lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–124 · show in text ↑
e5

“Four lines that were aromatic identified by different methods, were: IPB 140-F-6, B11249-9C-PN-3-3-2-2-MR1, B11742-RS*2-3-MR-34-1-2-1, and B11955-MR-84-1-4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2221–2376 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Line B11742-RS*2-3-MR-34-1-2-1 was identified as aromatic by different methods.

Material
B11742-RS*2-3-MR-34-1-2-1e5
Outcome
aromatice5
Qualifier
identified by different methodse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“promising rice lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–124 · show in text ↑
e5

“Four lines that were aromatic identified by different methods, were: IPB 140-F-6, B11249-9C-PN-3-3-2-2-MR1, B11742-RS*2-3-MR-34-1-2-1, and B11955-MR-84-1-4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2221–2376 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Line B11955-MR-84-1-4 was identified as aromatic by different methods.

Material
B11955-MR-84-1-4e5
Outcome
aromatice5
Qualifier
identified by different methodse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“promising rice lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–124 · show in text ↑
e5

“Four lines that were aromatic identified by different methods, were: IPB 140-F-6, B11249-9C-PN-3-3-2-2-MR1, B11742-RS*2-3-MR-34-1-2-1, and B11955-MR-84-1-4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2221–2376 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested rice lines had good grain quality.

Outcome
grain qualitye6
Qualifier
goode6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“promising rice lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–124 · show in text ↑
e6

“All lines tested had good grain quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2536–2575 · show in text ↑