Paper · 2004 · 中国农业科学:英文版

Effects of Real-Time and Site-Specific Nitrogen Managements on Rice Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency

LIULi-jun; SANGDa-zhi; LIUCui-lian; et al.

9
claims
23
verbatim quotes
13
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Using hybrid rice Shanyou63, the agronomic and economic characters of different nitrogen(N) managements were evaluated. The results showed that the grain yield of the control(N omission plots) ranged from 6.8 to 7.4 t ha-1, indicating the high indigenous N supplyof the soil. Compared with farmer's fertilizer practice (FFP, 240 kg N ha-1), the modifiedFFP (70% N of FFP), real-time N management (RTNM, applying N based on values ofchlorophyll meter) and site-specific N management (SSNM, applying nitrogen based on thetiming, amount of N and values of chlorophyll meter) increased the grain yield by 9.2-10.3%, 3.3-7.0% and 8.9-9.3%, and agronomic N efficiency (the increase in grain yieldper unit N applied) by 110.5-135.6%, 204.3- 297.0% and 200.9-276.4%, respectively. Theresults suggested that RTNM and SSNM have great potential for improving N use efficiencywithout sacrificing the grain yield. In addition, RTNM and SSNM also decreased chalkygrain percentage and chalkiness to improve grain appearance quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N-omission grain yield ranged from 6.8 to 7.4 t ha-1.

Material
Shanyou63e1
Treatment
N omission plotse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Value
6.8 to 7.4 t ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the grain yield of the control(N omission plots) ranged from 6.8 to 7.4 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–222 · show in text ↑
e1

“Shanyou63”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 18–27 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Modified FFP increased grain yield by 9.2-10.3% versus FFP.

Treatment
modifiedFFP (70% N of FFP)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.2-10.3%e0
Comparator
farmer's fertilizer practice (FFP, 240 kg N ha-1)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the modifiedFFP (70% N of FFP), real-time N management (RTNM, applying N based on values ofchlorophyll meter) and site-specific N management (SSNM, applying nitrogen based on thetiming, amount of N and values of chlorophyll meter) increased the grain yield by 9.2-10.3%, 3.3-7.0% and 8.9-9.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–633 · show in text ↑
e1

“farmer's fertilizer practice (FFP, 240 kg N ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–339 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RTNM increased grain yield by 3.3-7.0% versus FFP.

Treatment
real-time N management (RTNM, applying N based on values ofchlorophyll meter)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.3-7.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the modifiedFFP (70% N of FFP), real-time N management (RTNM, applying N based on values ofchlorophyll meter) and site-specific N management (SSNM, applying nitrogen based on thetiming, amount of N and values of chlorophyll meter) increased the grain yield by 9.2-10.3%, 3.3-7.0% and 8.9-9.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–633 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSNM increased grain yield by 8.9-9.3% versus FFP.

Treatment
site-specific N management (SSNM, applying nitrogen based on thetiming, amount of N and values of chlorophyll meter)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.9-9.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the modifiedFFP (70% N of FFP), real-time N management (RTNM, applying N based on values ofchlorophyll meter) and site-specific N management (SSNM, applying nitrogen based on thetiming, amount of N and values of chlorophyll meter) increased the grain yield by 9.2-10.3%, 3.3-7.0% and 8.9-9.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–633 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Modified FFP increased agronomic N efficiency by 110.5-135.6%.

Treatment
modifiedFFPe1
Outcome
agronomic N efficiencye0
Value
110.5-135.6%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“agronomic N efficiency (the increase in grain yieldper unit N applied) by 110.5-135.6%, 204.3- 297.0% and 200.9-276.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–757 · show in text ↑
e1

“modifiedFFP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–356 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RTNM increased agronomic N efficiency by 204.3- 297.0%.

Treatment
RTNMe1
Outcome
agronomic N efficiencye0
Value
204.3- 297.0%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“agronomic N efficiency (the increase in grain yieldper unit N applied) by 110.5-135.6%, 204.3- 297.0% and 200.9-276.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–757 · show in text ↑
e1

“real-time N management (RTNM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–401 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSNM increased agronomic N efficiency by 200.9-276.4%.

Treatment
SSNMe1
Outcome
agronomic N efficiencye0
Value
200.9-276.4%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“agronomic N efficiency (the increase in grain yieldper unit N applied) by 110.5-135.6%, 204.3- 297.0% and 200.9-276.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–757 · show in text ↑
e1

“site-specific N management (SSNM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–487 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RTNM decreased chalky grain percentage and chalkiness.

Treatment
RTNMe0
Outcome
chalkygrain percentage and chalkinesse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RTNM and SSNM also decreased chalkygrain percentage and chalkiness to improve grain appearance quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSNM decreased chalky grain percentage and chalkiness.

Treatment
SSNMe0
Outcome
chalkygrain percentage and chalkinesse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RTNM and SSNM also decreased chalkygrain percentage and chalkiness to improve grain appearance quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑

chlorophyll · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

climate site · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

172 papers: 110 positive, 62 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

168 papers more in this group

See all 172 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.