Paper · 2013 · Scientific Papers - Series B, Horticulture

Behaviour of delta cultivar nectarines during the valorization process according to the fertilization of the culture.

C. Alexe; M. Vintilă; Simona Mariana Popescu; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The researchers performed at the Research and Development Institute for Processing and Marketing of the Horticultural Product-Bucharest. They had as object the study of some qualitative indicators (firmness, organoleptic appreciation, chemical composition, weight and qualitative losses) of Delta cultivar nectarines at harvest as well as their evolution during the valorisation process. The nectarines – Delta cultivar (an extra-early cultivar, created by the researchers from Research Station for Fruit Growing Constanta, in collaborate with Rutgers University, New Jersey – S.U.A.), provided from experimental plots of R. S. F. G. Constanta. They were fertilized in different manners, with organic or chemical fertilizers, applied on soil and/or foliar. The nectarines were stored in three variants: at the ambient temperature (26-28C), in cold conditions (T = 2-4°C) and cold + modified atmosphere conditions, for 5, 25 and 30 days, respectively. It was found that the quality of the nectarines and their storage capacity varies according to the fertilisation regime and the conditions in the storage environment, especially the temperature and the gaseous composition of the air. Among the fertilisation variants, the V4 variant (soil + foliar chemical fertilisation) induces the best quality and storage capacity. Foliar fertilisers ensure not only an input of macro-and micro elements but also other organic substances which stimulate the metabolism of chlorophyll assimilation, the energetic delivery and finally, the fruit quality. Of the three storage methods (ambient temperature, cold room and cold room + modified atmosphere), the best results were obtained within the third method, which recorded the smallest losses during storage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nectarine quality and storage capacity varied with fertilisation regime and storage conditions.

Treatment
fertilisation regimee0
Outcome
quality of the nectarines and their storage capacitye0
Qualifier
temperature and the gaseous composition of the aire0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the quality of the nectarines and their storage capacity varies according to the fertilisation regime and the conditions in the storage environment, especially the temperature and the gaseous composition of the air”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The V4 soil and foliar chemical fertilisation variant gave the best quality and storage capacity.

Treatment
V4 variant (soil + foliar chemical fertilisation)e0
Outcome
quality and storage capacitye0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the V4 variant (soil + foliar chemical fertilisation) induces the best quality and storage capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1318 · show in text ↑
t0

“nectarines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–38 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar fertilisers supplied macro- and microelements and organic substances said to stimulate chlorophyll assimilation, energy delivery and fruit quality.

Treatment
Foliar fertiliserse0
Outcome
fruit qualitye0
Qualifier
metabolism of chlorophyll assimilation, the energetic deliverye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar fertilisers ensure not only an input of macro-and micro elements but also other organic substances which stimulate the metabolism of chlorophyll assimilation, the energetic delivery and finally, the fruit quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1539 · show in text ↑
t0

“nectarines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold room plus modified atmosphere gave the smallest nectarine storage losses among three methods.

Treatment
cold room + modified atmospheree0
Outcome
losses during storagee0
Direction
smalleste0
Comparator
ambient temperature, cold roome0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Of the three storage methods (ambient temperature, cold room and cold room + modified atmosphere), the best results were obtained within the third method, which recorded the smallest losses during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1541–1745 · show in text ↑
t0

“nectarines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–38 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: general · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

application · quality: general · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.