Paper · 2013 · International Journal of Biosciences (IJB)

Biochemical composition and effects of radiation on sensory, biochemical and physiological quality of fresh spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)

5
claims
6
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Leafy vegetables have become an important part of the diet because of their nutritive value and low calorie content. But leafy vegetables are very perishable and susceptible to postharvest damage and spoilage which limit the storage period and quality of them. Irradiation is being used in the preservation of leafy vegetables. The effects of irradiation (0.5 and 1.0 kGy) on sensory, biochemical, physiological attributes of spinach were investigated during 12 days of post-irradiation storage at 12°C ± 60% RH. Spinach treated with 1.0 kGy showed acceptability in color, flavor, texture and overall acceptability till 12 days during storage period whereas at the same period, control and 0.5 kGy treated samples were spoiled. Reduced rate of weight loss was observed in irradiated samples compare to control over the whole storage period. A minor decrease in the ascorbic acid content was the only adverse effect observed in irradiated spinach compare to control sample and no other major changes occurred in TSS, pH value of treated and untreated sample of spinach. Radiation processing of spinach at 1.0 kGy extends the shelf life without affecting sensory and nutritional qualities. Thus, radiation can be used for the shelf -life extension of leafy vegetables and is not harmful to health.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 1.0 kGy spinach retained sensory acceptability for 12 days, while control and 0.5 kGy samples spoiled.

Treatment
1.0 kGye0
Outcome
acceptability in color, flavor, texture and overall acceptabilitye0
Value
12 dayse0
Comparator
control and 0.5 kGy treated samplese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spinach treated with 1.0 kGy showed acceptability in color, flavor, texture and overall acceptability till 12 days during storage period whereas at the same period, control and 0.5 kGy treated samples were spoiled.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–727 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation reduced spinach weight loss relative to control throughout storage.

Treatment
irradiated samplese0
Outcome
rate of weight losse0
Direction
Reducede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduced rate of weight loss was observed in irradiated samples compare to control over the whole storage period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“spinach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation caused a minor decrease in spinach ascorbic acid content.

Treatment
irradiated spinache0
Outcome
ascorbic acid contente0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
control samplee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A minor decrease in the ascorbic acid content was the only adverse effect observed in irradiated spinach compare to control sample”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–971 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiation caused no other major change in spinach TSS and pH.

Treatment
treatede0
Outcome
TSS, pH valuee0
Direction
no other major changese0
Comparator
untreated samplee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no other major changes occurred in TSS, pH value of treated and untreated sample of spinach.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1068 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that 1.0 kGy irradiation extends spinach shelf life while retaining sensory and nutritional quality.

Outcome
Radiation processing of spinach at 1.0 kGy extends the shelf lifee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Radiation processing of spinach at 1.0 kGy extends the shelf life without affecting sensory and nutritional qualities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1187 · show in text ↑

radiation · quality: postharvest · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

radiation · quality: phytochemicals · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.