Paper · 2008 · International Journal of Industrial Entomology

Notes : Simple Self Trap Cropping System to Control Tukra Mealy Bug (Maconellicoccus hirsutus Green) Incidence on Mulberry (Morus spp.).

K Lavanya Latha; T. V. Rao; Jagadiswari Rao; et al.

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field study on self trap cropping system in controlling tukra mealy bug Maconellicoccus hirsutus Green) incidence on mulberry (Morus spp.; V-1 variety; 3`x3` spacing) gardens was undertaken in selected sericulture farmers` mulberry gardens of Pydeti village (Parigi Mandal, Anantapur District, Andhra Pradesh, India). The study was conducted for three years (2004, 2005 and 2006). Four treatments (T0; control/no treatment, T1; self trap cropping rows with 10 row interval, T2; self trap cropping rows with 10 row interval and treating these rows only with 0.5% neem oil emulsion and T3; self trap cropping rows with 10 rows intervals and treating all the mulberry rows including self trap cropping rows with 0.5% neem oil emulsion) were considered. The results indicated that the incidence increased in T0 and T1 while the same suppressed in T2 and T3. The suppression (%) of tukra incidence between T2 and T3 was not significant. Hence, T2 only was recommended to farmers as its economical viable practice. The results are discussed based on the importance of tukra, its suppression and cost of treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tukra mealy bug incidence increased in T0 and T1 mulberry plots.

Taxon
mulberrye1
Treatment
T0 and T1e2
Interactor
Maconellicoccus hirsutusMaconellicoccus hirsutuse1pest
Outcome
incidencee2
Direction
increasede2
Setting
Pydeti villagee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Maconellicoccus hirsutus
Maconellicoccus hirsutus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryUSDA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field study on self trap cropping system in controlling tukra mealy bug Maconellicoccus hirsutus Green) incidence on mulberry (Morus spp.; V-1 variety; 3`x3` spacing) gardens was undertaken in selected sericulture farmers` mulberry gardens of Pydeti village (Parigi Mandal, Anantapur District, Andhra Pradesh, India)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–318 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results indicated that the incidence increased in T0 and T1 while the same suppressed in T2 and T3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–854 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tukra mealy bug incidence was suppressed by self trap cropping rows with 0.5% neem oil emulsion in mulberry (T2 and T3).

Taxon
mulberrye1
Treatment
0.5% neem oil emulsione3
Interactor
Maconellicoccus hirsutusMaconellicoccus hirsutuse1pest
Outcome
incidencee2
Direction
suppressede2
Setting
Pydeti villagee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Maconellicoccus hirsutus
Maconellicoccus hirsutus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryUSDA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field study on self trap cropping system in controlling tukra mealy bug Maconellicoccus hirsutus Green) incidence on mulberry (Morus spp.; V-1 variety; 3`x3` spacing) gardens was undertaken in selected sericulture farmers` mulberry gardens of Pydeti village (Parigi Mandal, Anantapur District, Andhra Pradesh, India)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–318 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results indicated that the incidence increased in T0 and T1 while the same suppressed in T2 and T3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–854 · show in text ↑
e3

“T2; self trap cropping rows with 10 row interval and treating these rows only with 0.5% neem oil emulsion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–581 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The suppression of tukra incidence did not differ significantly between T2 and T3 in mulberry.

Taxon
mulberrye1
Treatment
T3e4
Interactor
Maconellicoccus hirsutusMaconellicoccus hirsutuse1pest
Outcome
suppression (%) of tukra incidencee4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4
Comparator
T2e4
Setting
Pydeti villagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Maconellicoccus hirsutus
Maconellicoccus hirsutus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryUSDA · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“A field study on self trap cropping system in controlling tukra mealy bug Maconellicoccus hirsutus Green) incidence on mulberry (Morus spp.; V-1 variety; 3`x3` spacing) gardens was undertaken in selected sericulture farmers` mulberry gardens of Pydeti village (Parigi Mandal, Anantapur District, Andhra Pradesh, India)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–318 · show in text ↑
e4

“The suppression (%) of tukra incidence between T2 and T3 was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–932 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

T2 only, self trap cropping rows treated with neem oil emulsion, was recommended to mulberry farmers as economically viable.

Taxon
mulberrye1
Outcome
T2 onlye5

Verbatim

e1

“A field study on self trap cropping system in controlling tukra mealy bug Maconellicoccus hirsutus Green) incidence on mulberry (Morus spp.; V-1 variety; 3`x3` spacing) gardens was undertaken in selected sericulture farmers` mulberry gardens of Pydeti village (Parigi Mandal, Anantapur District, Andhra Pradesh, India)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–318 · show in text ↑
e5

“Hence, T2 only was recommended to farmers as its economical viable practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1009 · show in text ↑

botanical · Maconellicoccus hirsutus · Morus (mulberry trees)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.