Paper · 2009 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Wpływ systemów uprawy roli, poziomów nawożenia i ochrony roślin na plonowanie jęczmienia jarego

Piotr Kraska; Edward Pałys

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

The field research was carried out in the years 1998-2000 in an experimental farm Bezek near Chełm, a part of Agricultural University in Lublin. A two-factor field experiment was set up at random bloks method in four replications on light and sandy clay soil. The phosphorus content in the soil was high, potassium medium and magnesium low. The humus content was 1.2%. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of conventional (with a plough) and minimum tillage systems (plough substituted by a cultivator with rigid shares) and two differentiated fertilization and plant protection levels upon grain and straw yield, 1000 grain weight and the structure elements of spring barley ear. Spring barley was cultivated in crop rotation potato–spring barley–winter rye. The results were statistically analyzed by means of variance analysis, and the mean values were estimated with Tukey's confidence intervals (p = 0.05). Intensive fertilization and plant protection levels with retardant application gave a significantly higher yield grain of spring barley, 1000 grain weight, number of ears productivity per 1 m2 in comparison with basic chemicalization levels. Years of investigations significantly differentiated the number of ears productivity, number of sterile shoot, total culm number, length of ear, grain weight of ear, and 1000 grain weight. Cultivation systems and chemicalization levels do not differentiate tte height of spring barley and grain number of ear.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intensive fertilization and protection significantly increased grain yield versus basic chemicalization.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Treatment
Intensive fertilization and plant protection levels with retardant applicatione0
Outcome
yield graine0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
basic chemicalization levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intensive fertilization and plant protection levels with retardant application gave a significantly higher yield grain of spring barley, 1000 grain weight, number of ears productivity per 1 m2 in comparison with basic chemicalization levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intensive fertilization and protection increased 1000 grain weight and ears per square metre.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Treatment
Intensive fertilization and plant protection levels with retardant applicatione0
Outcome
1000 grain weight, number of ears productivity per 1 m2e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
basic chemicalization levelse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Intensive fertilization and plant protection levels with retardant application gave a significantly higher yield grain of spring barley, 1000 grain weight, number of ears productivity per 1 m2 in comparison with basic chemicalization levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1172 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Investigation year significantly differentiated ears productivity, sterile shoot number and total culm number.

Taxon
jęczmienia jaregot0
Outcome
number of ears productivity, number of sterile shoot, total culm numbere0
Setting
Years of investigationse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Years of investigations significantly differentiated the number of ears productivity, number of sterile shoot, total culm number, length of ear, grain weight of ear, and 1000 grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1361 · show in text ↑
t0

“jęczmienia jarego”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–95 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Investigation year significantly differentiated ear length, grain weight per ear and 1000 grain weight.

Taxon
jęczmienia jaregot0
Outcome
length of ear, grain weight of ear, and 1000 grain weighte0
Setting
Years of investigationse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Years of investigations significantly differentiated the number of ears productivity, number of sterile shoot, total culm number, length of ear, grain weight of ear, and 1000 grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1361 · show in text ↑
t0

“jęczmienia jarego”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivation and chemicalization levels did not differentiate barley height or grains per ear.

Taxon
spring barleyHordeum vulgaree0
Treatment
Cultivation systems and chemicalization levelse0
Outcome
height of spring barley and grain number of eare0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivation systems and chemicalization levels do not differentiate tte height of spring barley and grain number of ear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1482 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

472 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.