Paper · 2011 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Assessment of oil and seed meal quality parameters of rapeseed-mustard group of crops.

J. S. Chauhan; Satyanshu Kumar

18
claims
18
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Oil, protein, glucosinolates, fibre content and fatty acid profile were investigated in 43 rapeseed-mustard varieties. Oil content ranged from 36.5 % in karan rai variety ‘PC 5’ to 43.5 % in ‘Jhumka’, a yellow sarson variety. The maximum (20.7%) and minimum (17.6%) protein content was recorded for a variety of ‘GSL 1’ gobhi sarson (‘GSL 1’) and ‘Jhumka’ yellow sarson, respectively. A wide variation was observed for different fatty acids. Gobhi sarson varieties (‘Neelam’ and ‘Sheetal’) and of brown sarson (‘KBS 3’) had oleic acid in the range of 22.5–32.2 %. The oleic to linoleic and ω-6 to ω-3 fatty acid ratio were very low, the highest was 1.7 and 2.4, respectively. ‘GSL 1’ and ‘Sheetal’ of gobhi sarson; ‘Pusa Gold’ and ‘Jhumka’ of yellow sarson showed low level of linolenic acid (< 10%). Glucosinolates content in all the varieties was much higher than the desired level of < 30 μ moles / g defatted seed meal. Two varieties ‘RCC 4’ of Indian mustard and ‘Sheetal’ of gobhi sarson had glucosinolates < 50 μ moles / g defatted seed meal. Fibre content varied substantially ranging from 6.3–18.9 %. Contrary to the belief that yellow-seeded varieties had low fibre content, two yellow sarson varieties had the highest fibre content. Correlation studies revealed significant and negative association of oil with protein content (r = –0.566**), saturated fatty acid (r = –0.392*) and glucosinolates (r = –0.451**). Protein content and saturated fatty acid were positively and significantly correlated with each other (r = 0.335*). Oleic acid had positive and highly significant relationship with linoleic, eicosenoic, oleic to linoleic and ω-6 to ω-3 fatty acid ratio. Glucosinolates and fibre content did not show any relationship with any of the quality parameters investigated.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil content ranged from 36.5% in PC 5 to 43.5% in Jhumka.

Material
‘PC 5’e0
Outcome
Oil contente0
Value
36.5 %e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Oil content ranged from 36.5 % in karan rai variety ‘PC 5’ to 43.5 % in ‘Jhumka’, a yellow sarson variety.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–225 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jhumka had 43.5% oil content.

Material
‘Jhumka’e0
Outcome
Oil contente0
Value
43.5 %e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Oil content ranged from 36.5 % in karan rai variety ‘PC 5’ to 43.5 % in ‘Jhumka’, a yellow sarson variety.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 119–225 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GSL 1 had maximum protein content of 20.7%.

Material
‘GSL 1’e0
Outcome
protein contente0
Value
20.7%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum (20.7%) and minimum (17.6%) protein content was recorded for a variety of ‘GSL 1’ gobhi sarson (‘GSL 1’) and ‘Jhumka’ yellow sarson, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–384 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jhumka had minimum protein content of 17.6%.

Material
‘Jhumka’e0
Outcome
protein contente0
Value
17.6%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum (20.7%) and minimum (17.6%) protein content was recorded for a variety of ‘GSL 1’ gobhi sarson (‘GSL 1’) and ‘Jhumka’ yellow sarson, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 226–384 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neelam, Sheetal, and KBS 3 had oleic acid in the 22.5–32.2% range.

Material
‘Neelam’e0
Outcome
oleic acide0
Value
22.5–32.2 %e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Gobhi sarson varieties (‘Neelam’ and ‘Sheetal’) and of brown sarson (‘KBS 3’) had oleic acid in the range of 22.5–32.2 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–563 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest oleic-to-linoleic ratio was 1.7.

Outcome
oleic to linoleice0
Value
1.7e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The oleic to linoleic and ω-6 to ω-3 fatty acid ratio were very low, the highest was 1.7 and 2.4, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–675 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest omega-6-to-omega-3 ratio was 2.4.

Outcome
ω-6 to ω-3 fatty acid ratioe0
Value
2.4e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The oleic to linoleic and ω-6 to ω-3 fatty acid ratio were very low, the highest was 1.7 and 2.4, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–675 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GSL 1, Sheetal, Pusa Gold, and Jhumka had linolenic acid below 10%.

Outcome
linolenic acide0
Value
< 10%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“‘GSL 1’ and ‘Sheetal’ of gobhi sarson; ‘Pusa Gold’ and ‘Jhumka’ of yellow sarson showed low level of linolenic acid (< 10%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–800 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All varieties had glucosinolate content much higher than the desired level of 30 μmoles per gram defatted meal.

Outcome
Glucosinolates contente0
Direction
much highere0
Value
< 30 μ moles / g defatted seed meale0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Glucosinolates content in all the varieties was much higher than the desired level of < 30 μ moles / g defatted seed meal.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–923 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RCC 4 and Sheetal had glucosinolates below 50 μmoles per gram defatted seed meal.

Outcome
glucosinolatese0
Value
< 50 μ moles / g defatted seed meale0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Two varieties ‘RCC 4’ of Indian mustard and ‘Sheetal’ of gobhi sarson had glucosinolates < 50 μ moles / g defatted seed meal.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1049 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fibre content ranged from 6.3 to 18.9%.

Outcome
Fibre contente0
Value
6.3–18.9 %e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Fibre content varied substantially ranging from 6.3–18.9 %.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1050–1109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two yellow sarson varieties had the highest fibre content.

Taxon
yellow sarsone0
Outcome
fibre contente0
Direction
higheste0

Verbatim

e0

“two yellow sarson varieties had the highest fibre content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1243 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil and protein content were significantly negatively correlated.

Outcome
oile0
Direction
negativee0
Value
r = –0.566**e0
Comparator
protein contente0

Not reportedTaxonCompound

Verbatim

e0

“significant and negative association of oil with protein content (r = –0.566**)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1352 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil and saturated fatty acid content were significantly negatively correlated.

Outcome
oile0
Direction
negativee0
Value
r = –0.392*e0
Comparator
saturated fatty acide0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“significant and negative association of oil with protein content (r = –0.566**), saturated fatty acid (r = –0.392*)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1388 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Oil and glucosinolate content were significantly negatively correlated.

Outcome
oile0
Direction
negativee0
Value
r = –0.451**e0
Comparator
glucosinolatese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“significant and negative association of oil with protein content (r = –0.566**), saturated fatty acid (r = –0.392*) and glucosinolates (r = –0.451**)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1422 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein and saturated fatty acid contents were significantly positively correlated.

Outcome
Protein contente0
Direction
positivelye0
Value
r = 0.335*e0
Comparator
saturated fatty acide0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Protein content and saturated fatty acid were positively and significantly correlated with each other (r = 0.335*).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1424–1539 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Oleic acid was significantly positively related to linoleic acid, eicosenoic acid, oleic-to-linoleic ratio, and omega-6-to-omega-3 ratio.

Outcome
Oleic acide0
Direction
positivee0
Comparator
linoleice0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Oleic acid had positive and highly significant relationship with linoleic, eicosenoic, oleic to linoleic and ω-6 to ω-3 fatty acid ratio.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1677 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glucosinolates and fibre content showed no relationship with investigated quality parameters.

Outcome
Glucosinolates and fibre contente0
Direction
did not show any relationshipe0
Comparator
quality parameters investigatede0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Glucosinolates and fibre content did not show any relationship with any of the quality parameters investigated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1789 · show in text ↑