Abstract
'Hongro' and 'Gamhong' apples grown at the Gochang-si in the southern part of Korea were harvested on September in 2002 for storage study. Each cultivar was divided into two groups of maturity based on the harvested date. Immature fruits were harvested 10 days early compared to fruits having proper maturity. This study was conducted to evaluate quality the change of 'Hongro' and 'Gamhong' apples newly bred by different storage methods with PE film package and CA conditions. A typical climacteric respiration pattern was observed in new variety 'Hongro' and 'Gamhong' apples stored at room temperature. The results indicated that fresh quality of the stored fruits in CA condition was better than that in other treatments during storage. Qualities of apples were least changed at CA storage of 3% and 1% . CA storage was effective in maintaining the freshness of 'Hongro' and 'Gamhong' for 16 weeks.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Hongro apples showed climacteric respiration at room temperature.
- Taxon
- apples
Malus domesticae0 - Material
- 'Hongro'e0
- Outcome
- climacteric respiration patterne0
- Setting
- room temperaturee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A typical climacteric respiration pattern was observed in new variety 'Hongro' and 'Gamhong' apples stored at room temperature.”
Claim · model-written summary
Gamhong apples showed climacteric respiration at room temperature.
- Taxon
- applesMalus domesticae0
- Material
- 'Gamhong'e0
- Outcome
- climacteric respiration patterne0
- Setting
- room temperaturee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A typical climacteric respiration pattern was observed in new variety 'Hongro' and 'Gamhong' apples stored at room temperature.”
Claim · model-written summary
CA storage preserved better fruit quality than other treatments.
- Taxon
- applesMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- CA conditione0
- Outcome
- fresh qualitye0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fresh quality of the stored fruits in CA condition was better than that in other treatments during storage”
t0“Apples”
Claim · model-written summary
Apple quality changed least in CA storage at 3% and 1%.
- Taxon
- applesMalus domesticae0
- Treatment
- CA storage of 3% and 1%e0
- Outcome
- Qualities of applese0
- Direction
- least changede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Qualities of apples were least changed at CA storage of 3% and 1% .”
Claim · model-written summary
CA storage maintained Hongro freshness for 16 weeks.
- Taxon
- applesMalus domesticat0
- Material
- 'Hongro'e0
- Treatment
- CA storagee0
- Outcome
- freshnesse0
- Value
- 16 weekse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“CA storage was effective in maintaining the freshness of 'Hongro' and 'Gamhong' for 16 weeks.”
t0“Apples”
Claim · model-written summary
CA storage maintained Gamhong freshness for 16 weeks.
- Taxon
- applesMalus domesticat0
- Material
- 'Gamhong'e0
- Treatment
- CA storagee0
- Outcome
- freshnesse0
- Value
- 16 weekse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“CA storage was effective in maintaining the freshness of 'Hongro' and 'Gamhong' for 16 weeks.”
t0“Apples”
The same questions in other papers
storage · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
114 papers more in this group
See all 118 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.