Paper · 1989 · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)

Effect of Ortho XE-1019 on the germination and seedling growth of two cotton cultivars

Nadia Mussad Mohamed

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Experiments were conducted to determine if there was a residual effect of the experimental plant growth regulator Ortho XE-1019, (E)-(P-chlorophenyl)-4,4-dimethyl-2-1,2,4-triazol-l-yl)-l-penten-3-01, remaining in Deltapine 50 and 90 cottonseed obtained at three harvest dates from experiments run at the University of Arizona Marana and Maricopa Agricultural Centers in 1986. Commercial DPL 50 seed were treated with XE-1019 in a second experiment. Several growth characteristics were measured including dry weights after 7 and 12 days. Hypocotyl length was not significantly different between treatments after 12 days of growth, with one exception, nor between dates of harvest for DPL 90 and DPL 50. Other measurements sometimes had statistical differences which were more academic but would be of little consequence in obtaining a satisfactory field stand. A significant reduction of hypocotyl length resulted when seed was directly treated with XE-1019 and would result in poor emergence. Results indicated that the use of XE-1019 as a plant growth regulator on cotton would not have significant residual responses on early seedling growth of Deltapine 90 and Deltapine 50 when the resulting seed are used for planting seed in the next generation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residual XE-1019 in harvested seed did not significantly change hypocotyl length between treatments after 12 days of growth, with one exception.

Treatment
XE-1019e3
Outcome
Hypocotyl lengthe1
Direction
not significantly differente1
Comparator
between treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Hypocotyl length was not significantly different between treatments after 12 days of growth, with one exception, nor between dates of harvest for DPL 90 and DPL 50”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–700 · show in text ↑
e3

“Results indicated that the use of XE-1019 as a plant growth regulator on cotton would not have significant residual responses on early seedling growth of Deltapine 90 and Deltapine 50 when the resulting seed are used for planting seed in the next generation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1250 · show in text ↑
t0

“two cotton cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed directly treated with XE-1019 significantly reduced hypocotyl length, which would result in poor emergence.

Treatment
seed was directly treated with XE-1019e0
Outcome
hypocotyl lengthe0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
would result in poor emergencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant reduction of hypocotyl length resulted when seed was directly treated with XE-1019 and would result in poor emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“two cotton cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–86 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Some other seedling measurements showed statistical differences, but these were of little consequence for obtaining a field stand.

Outcome
Other measurementse2
Qualifier
of little consequencee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Other measurements sometimes had statistical differences which were more academic but would be of little consequence in obtaining a satisfactory field stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“two cotton cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

XE-1019 as a plant growth regulator would not have significant residual effects on early seedling growth of Deltapine 90 and Deltapine 50 when the resulting seed is used for planting.

Material
Deltapine 90 and Deltapine 50e3
Treatment
the use of XE-1019 as a plant growth regulatore3
Outcome
early seedling growthe3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3
Qualifier
when the resulting seed are used for planting seed in the next generatione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Results indicated that the use of XE-1019 as a plant growth regulator on cotton would not have significant residual responses on early seedling growth of Deltapine 90 and Deltapine 50 when the resulting seed are used for planting seed in the next generation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1250 · show in text ↑
t0

“two cotton cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–86 · show in text ↑

class · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 25 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.