Abstract
Grain yields of wheat and grain sorghum increased with decreased tillage intensity in a wheat-sorghum-fallow (WSF) rotation. In 2014, available soil water at wheat planting was 2 inches greater for no-till (NT) than for reduced-tillage (RT) or conventional tillage (CT). For grain sorghum in 2014, available soil water at planting was greatest with RT and least with CT. Averaged across the 14-year study, available soil water at wheat and sorghum planting was similar for RT and NT and about 1 inch greater than CT. Averaged across the past 14 years, NT wheat yields were 5 bu/a greater than RT and 7 bu/a greater than CT. Grain sorghum yields in 2014 were 22 bu/a greater with longterm NT than short-term NT. Averaged across the past 14 years, sorghum yields with long-term NT have been nearly twice as great as short-term NT (61 vs. 33 bu/a).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat grain yield increased with decreased tillage intensity in a wheat-sorghum-fallow rotation.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- decreased tillage intensitye0
- Outcome
- Grain yieldse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grain yields of wheat and grain sorghum increased with decreased tillage intensity”
Claim · model-written summary
Grain sorghum yield increased with decreased tillage intensity in a wheat-sorghum-fallow rotation.
- Taxon
- grain sorghum
Sorghum bicolore0 - Treatment
- decreased tillage intensitye0
- Outcome
- Grain yieldse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grain yields of wheat and grain sorghum increased with decreased tillage intensity”
Claim · model-written summary
In 2014, available soil water at wheat planting was 2 inches greater under no-till than under reduced or conventional tillage.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- no-till (NT)e1
- Outcome
- available soil water at wheat plantinge1
- Direction
- greatere1
- Value
- 2 inchese1
- Comparator
- reduced-tillage (RT) or conventional tillage (CT)e1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“In 2014, available soil water at wheat planting was 2 inches greater for no-till (NT) than for reduced-tillage (RT) or conventional tillage (CT)”
Claim · model-written summary
In 2014, available soil water at grain sorghum planting was greatest with reduced tillage (RT).
- Taxon
- grain sorghumSorghum bicolore2
- Treatment
- RTe2
- Outcome
- available soil water at plantinge2
- Direction
- greateste2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“For grain sorghum in 2014, available soil water at planting was greatest with RT and least with CT”
Claim · model-written summary
In 2014, available soil water at grain sorghum planting was least with conventional tillage (CT).
- Taxon
- grain sorghumSorghum bicolore2
- Treatment
- CTe2
- Outcome
- available soil water at plantinge2
- Direction
- leaste2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“For grain sorghum in 2014, available soil water at planting was greatest with RT and least with CT”
Claim · model-written summary
Averaged over 14 years, available soil water at wheat planting was similar under RT and NT.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume3
- Treatment
- RT and NTe3
- Outcome
- available soil water at wheat and sorghum plantinge3
- Direction
- similare3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“Averaged across the 14-year study, available soil water at wheat and sorghum planting was similar for RT and NT and about 1 inch greater than CT”
Claim · model-written summary
Averaged over 14 years, available soil water at grain sorghum planting was similar under RT and NT.
SorghumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“Averaged across the 14-year study, available soil water at wheat and sorghum planting was similar for RT and NT and about 1 inch greater than CT”
Claim · model-written summary
Averaged over 14 years, available soil water at wheat planting was about 1 inch greater than under conventional tillage.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume3
- Outcome
- available soil water at wheat and sorghum plantinge3
- Direction
- greatere3
- Value
- about 1 inche3
- Comparator
- CTe3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“Averaged across the 14-year study, available soil water at wheat and sorghum planting was similar for RT and NT and about 1 inch greater than CT”
Claim · model-written summary
Averaged over 14 years, available soil water at grain sorghum planting was about 1 inch greater than under conventional tillage.
- Outcome
- available soil water at wheat and sorghum plantinge3
- Direction
- greatere3
- Value
- about 1 inche3
- Comparator
- CTe3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“Averaged across the 14-year study, available soil water at wheat and sorghum planting was similar for RT and NT and about 1 inch greater than CT”
Claim · model-written summary
Averaged over 14 years, NT wheat yields were 5 bu/a greater than RT.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume4
- Treatment
- NTe4
- Outcome
- wheat yieldse4
- Direction
- greatere4
- Value
- 5 bu/ae4
- Qualifier
- Averaged across the past 14 yearse4
- Comparator
- RTe4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Averaged across the past 14 years, NT wheat yields were 5 bu/a greater than RT and 7 bu/a greater than CT”
Claim · model-written summary
Averaged over 14 years, NT wheat yields were 7 bu/a greater than conventional tillage (CT).
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume4
- Treatment
- NTe4
- Outcome
- wheat yieldse4
- Direction
- greatere4
- Value
- 7 bu/ae4
- Qualifier
- Averaged across the past 14 yearse4
- Comparator
- CTe4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Averaged across the past 14 years, NT wheat yields were 5 bu/a greater than RT and 7 bu/a greater than CT”
Claim · model-written summary
In 2014, grain sorghum yields were 22 bu/a greater with long-term no-till than with short-term no-till.
- Taxon
- Grain sorghumSorghum bicolore5
- Treatment
- longterm NTe5
- Outcome
- yieldse5
- Direction
- greatere5
- Value
- 22 bu/ae5
- Qualifier
- in 2014e5
- Comparator
- short-term NTe5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“Grain sorghum yields in 2014 were 22 bu/a greater with longterm NT than short-term NT”
Claim · model-written summary
Averaged over 14 years, grain sorghum yields with long-term no-till were nearly twice those with short-term no-till (61 vs. 33 bu/a).
- Treatment
- long-term NTe6
- Outcome
- yieldse6
- Direction
- nearly twice as greate6
- Value
- 61 vs. 33 bu/ae6
- Qualifier
- Averaged across the past 14 yearse6
- Comparator
- short-term NTe6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“Averaged across the past 14 years, sorghum yields with long-term NT have been nearly twice as great as short-term NT (61 vs. 33 bu/a)”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · yield · SorghumResults differ
101 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
119 papers more in this group
See all 123 papers →tillage · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
44 papers more in this group
See all 48 papers →tillage · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
138 papers more in this group
See all 142 papers →tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
1,410 papers more in this group
See all 1,414 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.