Paper · 2008 · University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland)

Crop rotation to replace nematicide treatments for assessing chickpea varietal tolerance to Pratylenchus thornei

R. A. Reen; T. G. Clewett; John Thompson

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field trials were conducted to determine if crop rotation would suppress soil populations of Pratylenchus thornei and eliminate the use of nematicde plots when assessing chickpea cultivars for tolerance. Assessing yield response to P. thornei is difficult due to problems associated with nematicide penetration in the sub-soil. In year one, plot treatments consisted of canola, linseed, canaryseed, wheat and bare fallow, applied with or without aldicarb at 10kg/hectare in a three randomized block design. The following year the same plots were recropped with four chickpea cultivars and one intolerant wheat cultivar and aldicarb re-applied to the nematicide plots. Results from the pre-crops revealed wheat produced significantly higher nematode numbers throughout the soil profile than the other treatments. P. thornei populations peaked at depths of 45-60cm but nematicide was only effective down to depths of 30cm. Canola and fallow resulted in significantly lower populations of mycorrhizal spores than wheat. Canaryseed resulted in low nematode numbers in contrast to wheat and high mycorrhizal spores comparable to wheat so it was selected as the best control treatment for future use. All pre-crop treatments had similar moisture down to depths of 60cm. Chickpea yields on pre-cropped canary plots increased by 10-30% compared to yields on pre-cropped wheat plots. Nematicide on canary plots gave no additional yield of the following chickpea. Results demonstrated that using resistant canary and susceptible wheat plots is an effective alternative to plus nematicide and minus nematicide treatments when assessing tolerance in chickpea cultivars. This methodology has been successfully implemented in subsequent trials.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat as pre-crop produced significantly higher nematode numbers throughout the soil profile than the other pre-crop treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
wheate0
Interactor
Pratylenchus thorneiPratylenchus thorneit0pest
Outcome
nematode numbers throughout the soil profilee0
Direction
significantly highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea varietal tolerance to Pratylenchus thornei”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–112 · show in text ↑
e0

“Results from the pre-crops revealed wheat produced significantly higher nematode numbers throughout the soil profile than the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–810 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canaryseed as pre-crop gave low nematode numbers in contrast to wheat.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Canaryseede1
Interactor
Pratylenchus thorneiPratylenchus thorneit0pest
Outcome
nematode numberse1
Direction
lowe1
Comparator
wheate1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea varietal tolerance to Pratylenchus thornei”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“Canaryseed resulted in low nematode numbers in contrast to wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1081 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Canola and fallow as pre-crops gave significantly lower populations of mycorrhizal spores than wheat.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Canola and fallowe2
Interactor
mycorrhizale2symbiont
Outcome
populations of mycorrhizal sporese2
Direction
significantly lowere2
Comparator
wheate2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea varietal tolerance to Pratylenchus thornei”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–112 · show in text ↑
e2

“Canola and fallow resulted in significantly lower populations of mycorrhizal spores than wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1015 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canaryseed gave mycorrhizal spore numbers comparable to wheat.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Canaryseede6
Interactor
mycorrhizale3symbiont
Outcome
mycorrhizal sporese3
Direction
comparablee3
Comparator
wheate3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea varietal tolerance to Pratylenchus thornei”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–112 · show in text ↑
e3

“high mycorrhizal spores comparable to wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1129 · show in text ↑
e6

“Canaryseed resulted in low nematode numbers in contrast to wheat and high mycorrhizal spores comparable to wheat so it was selected as the best control treatment for future use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1193 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All pre-crop treatments had similar soil moisture down to 60 cm depth.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
pre-crop treatmentse4
Outcome
moisturee4
Direction
similare4
Qualifier
down to depths of 60cme4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea varietal tolerance to Pratylenchus thornei”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–112 · show in text ↑
e4

“All pre-crop treatments had similar moisture down to depths of 60cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1262 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pratylenchus thornei populations peaked at depths of 45-60 cm.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Interactor
P. thorneiPratylenchus thorneie5pest
Outcome
P. thornei populationse5
Value
45-60cme5
Qualifier
peaked at depths of 45-60cme5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea varietal tolerance to Pratylenchus thornei”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–112 · show in text ↑
e5

“P. thornei populations peaked at depths of 45-60cm but nematicide was only effective down to depths of 30cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–919 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The nematicide was effective only down to 30 cm depth.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
nematicidee5
Interactor
P. thorneiPratylenchus thorneie5pest
Outcome
effectivee5
Qualifier
only effective down to depths of 30cme5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea varietal tolerance to Pratylenchus thornei”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–112 · show in text ↑
e5

“P. thornei populations peaked at depths of 45-60cm but nematicide was only effective down to depths of 30cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–919 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea yields after canaryseed pre-crop increased by 10-30% compared with yields after wheat.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume7
Treatment
pre-cropped canary plotse7
Outcome
Chickpea yieldse7
Direction
increasede7
Value
10-30%e7
Comparator
pre-cropped wheat plotse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea varietal tolerance to Pratylenchus thornei”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–112 · show in text ↑
e7

“Chickpea yields on pre-cropped canary plots increased by 10-30% compared to yields on pre-cropped wheat plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1373 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nematicide on canary plots gave no additional yield of the following chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
Nematicidee1
Outcome
yield of the following chickpeae1
Direction
no additionale1
Comparator
canary plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea varietal tolerance to Pratylenchus thornei”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–112 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nematicide on canary plots gave no additional yield of the following chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1375–1452 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Resistant canary and susceptible wheat plots are an effective alternative to plus- and minus-nematicide plots for assessing chickpea tolerance.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume2
Interactor
Pratylenchus thorneiPratylenchus thorneit0pest
Outcome
assessing tolerance in chickpea cultivarse2
Comparator
plus nematicide and minus nematicide treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea varietal tolerance to Pratylenchus thornei”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–112 · show in text ↑
e2

“Results demonstrated that using resistant canary and susceptible wheat plots is an effective alternative to plus nematicide and minus nematicide treatments when assessing tolerance in chickpea cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1656 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Canaryseed was selected as the best control treatment for future use.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Canaryseede6
Outcome
best control treatment for future usee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea varietal tolerance to Pratylenchus thornei”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–112 · show in text ↑
e6

“Canaryseed resulted in low nematode numbers in contrast to wheat and high mycorrhizal spores comparable to wheat so it was selected as the best control treatment for future use”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1193 · show in text ↑

insecticide · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.