Paper · 2000 · Journal of Entomological Research

Feeding responses of Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) larvae to foliage extracts of two maize cultivars.

Anupam K. Varshney; Ashok K. Singh

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Feeding responses of the spotted stem borer, Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) larvae to the foliage extracts of two cultivars viz., Basi local and Kisan, were studied in the laboratory. The foliage of these two maize cultivars was extracted in aqueous methanol and n-hexane for their polar and non-polar constituents, respectively. The crude extracts were concentrated and applied on cellulose acetate discs before being fed to the larvae. Significant differences were observed in the feeding responses of the stem borer larvae to the crude solvent extracts of the two cultivars. The larvae consumed significantly greater quantity of the cellulose acetate discs treated with n-hexane and methanol extracts of Basi local leaves than the discs treated with corresponding extracts of Kisan leaves. This indicated the role of polar as well as non-polar chemicals in governing the feeding responses of the larvae. Evidently, the Kisan foliage contains certain chemical factors, which adversely affected the feeding responses of the stem borer larvae.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilo partellus larvae consumed significantly more discs treated with Basi local extracts than discs treated with Kisan extracts.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
Basi locale1
Treatment
n-hexane and methanol extractse1
Interactor
Chilo partellusChilo partellust0herbivore
Outcome
quantity of the cellulose acetate discse1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
Kisane1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chilo partellus
Chilo partellus · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Feeding responses of Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) larvae to foliage extracts of two maize cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e1

“The larvae consumed significantly greater quantity of the cellulose acetate discs treated with n-hexane and methanol extracts of Basi local leaves than the discs treated with corresponding extracts of Kisan leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–786 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Kisan foliage contains chemical factors that adversely affected the feeding responses of Chilo partellus larvae.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Material
Kisane2
Interactor
Chilo partellusChilo partellust0herbivore
Outcome
feeding responses of the stem borer larvaee2
Qualifier
certain chemical factorse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chilo partellus
Chilo partellus · InteractorKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Feeding responses of Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) larvae to foliage extracts of two maize cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–121 · show in text ↑
e2

“the Kisan foliage contains certain chemical factors, which adversely affected the feeding responses of the stem borer larvae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1037 · show in text ↑

botanical · Chilo partellus · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.