Paper · 2013 · TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY

Chitosan coating improves the shelf life and postharvest quality of table grape (Vitis vinifera) cultivar Shahroudi

MOHAMMAD ALI SHIRI; DAVOOD BAKHSHI; MAHMOOD GHASEMNEZHAD; et al.

7
claims
10
verbatim quotes
62
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Table grapes (Vitis vinifera) of the cultivar Shahroudi were coated with 0.5% or 1% chitosan and then stored at 0 °C for 60 days. Shelf-life qualitative traits including rachis and berry appearance and berry cracking, shattering, decay, browning, acceptability, and flavor were evaluated. Treated berries showed less weight loss, decay, browning, shattering, and cracking. Flavor-related factors such as total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity (TA), and TSS/TA ratio levels were higher in treated fruits; however, there was no significant difference between the fruits treated with 0.5% and 1% chitosan. Changes of the total phenolics, catechin, and antioxidant capacity of the berries coated with chitosan were delayed, while quercetin 3-galactoside and total quercetin were higher in the control treatment. Overall, fruits coated with chitosan had greater external adequacy than untreated ones.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan-coated berries had less weight loss, decay, and browning.

Taxon
Table grapese0
Material
Shahroudie0
Treatment
0.5% or 1% chitosane0
Outcome
weight loss, decay, browninge1
Direction
lesse1
Setting
0 °C for 60 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Table grapes (Vitis vinifera) of the cultivar Shahroudi were coated with 0.5% or 1% chitosan and then stored at 0 °C for 60 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treated berries showed less weight loss, decay, browning, shattering, and cracking.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–372 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan-coated berries had less shattering and cracking.

Taxon
Table grapese0
Treatment
0.5% or 1% chitosane0
Outcome
shattering, and crackinge1
Direction
lesse1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Table grapes (Vitis vinifera) of the cultivar Shahroudi were coated with 0.5% or 1% chitosan and then stored at 0 °C for 60 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“Treated berries showed less weight loss, decay, browning, shattering, and cracking.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–372 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total soluble solids, titratable acidity, and their ratio were higher in chitosan-treated fruit.

Taxon
Table grapese0
Treatment
0.5% or 1% chitosane0
Outcome
total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity (TA), and TSS/TA ratio levelse1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Table grapes (Vitis vinifera) of the cultivar Shahroudi were coated with 0.5% or 1% chitosan and then stored at 0 °C for 60 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–129 · show in text ↑
e1

“total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity (TA), and TSS/TA ratio levels were higher in treated fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–510 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The measured flavor factors did not differ significantly between 0.5% and 1% chitosan treatments.

Treatment
0.5%e0
Outcome
Flavor-related factorse0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
1% chitosane0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Flavor-related factors such as total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity (TA), and TSS/TA ratio levels were higher in treated fruits; however, there was no significant difference between the fruits treated with 0.5% and 1% chitosan.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–610 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan coating delayed changes in total phenolics, catechin, and antioxidant capacity.

Treatment
chitosane0
Outcome
total phenolics, catechin, and antioxidant capacitye0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Changes of the total phenolics, catechin, and antioxidant capacity of the berries coated with chitosan were delayed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–726 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Quercetin 3-galactoside and total quercetin were higher in untreated controls.

Outcome
quercetin 3-galactoside and total quercetine0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Not reportedTaxonTreatment

Verbatim

e0

“quercetin 3-galactoside and total quercetin were higher in the control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan-coated grapes had greater external adequacy than untreated grapes.

Treatment
chitosane0
Outcome
external adequacye0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
untreated onese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“fruits coated with chitosan had greater external adequacy than untreated ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–902 · show in text ↑

chitosan · disease · VitisResults agree

21 papers: 21 positive, 0 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.