Paper · 2026 · Discover Plants.

Induction of parthenocarpy in muskmelon through plant growth regulators under greenhouse conditions

Hare Krishna; Shreya Panwar; Swati Sharma; et al.

6
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Muskmelon ( Cucumis melo L.) is a high-value crop with significant nutritional and market appeal. Protected cultivation improves fruit quality and profitability, but the lack of parthenocarpic varieties limits yield under low pollination conditions. This study evaluated the potential of plant growth regulators (PGRs) to induce parthenocarpy in muskmelon variety ‘Kashi Madhu’ under greenhouse conditions. A mixture of β-naphthoxyacetic acid (10 µM), gibberellic acid (GA 3 290 µM), 24-epibrassinolide (0.2 µM), melatonin (10 µM), and putrescine hydrochloride (180 µM) was applied via lanolin wax to the pedicels on the day of anthesis. PGR-induced fruits were 8.2% heavier (1.05 kg) and had 39% lower seed weight (6.88 g) than hand-pollinated controls (11.25 g). The edible-to-non-edible ratio improved by 74% (11.81 vs. 6.77), while total phenolic content and antioxidant activity increased by 73% and 29%, respectively. Enzymatic browning indicators, including PPO and POD activities, were significantly reduced, enhancing visual quality. These results demonstrate that PGR-induced parthenocarpy can improve yield efficiency, fruit seedlessness, and postharvest quality in greenhouse muskmelon. Further refinement of PGR combinations could optimize cost-effectiveness and application efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGR-treated fruits were 8.2% heavier than hand-pollinated controls.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
PGR-inducede0
Outcome
fruitse0
Direction
heaviere0
Value
8.2%e0
Qualifier
1.05 kge0
Comparator
hand-pollinated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PGR-induced fruits were 8.2% heavier (1.05 kg) and had 39% lower seed weight (6.88 g) than hand-pollinated controls (11.25 g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–764 · show in text ↑
t0

“muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 · show in text ↑
t1

“muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGR-treated fruits had 39% lower seed weight than hand-pollinated controls.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
PGR-inducede0
Outcome
seed weighte0
Direction
lowere0
Value
39%e0
Qualifier
6.88 ge0
Comparator
hand-pollinated controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PGR-induced fruits were 8.2% heavier (1.05 kg) and had 39% lower seed weight (6.88 g) than hand-pollinated controls (11.25 g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–764 · show in text ↑
t0

“muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 · show in text ↑
t1

“muskmelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The edible-to-non-edible ratio improved by 74%.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
PGRe1
Outcome
edible-to-non-edible ratioe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
74%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The edible-to-non-edible ratio improved by 74% (11.81 vs. 6.77)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“muskmelon through plant growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–71 · show in text ↑
t1

“muskmelon through plant growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“PGR-induced fruits were 8.2% heavier (1.05 kg) and had 39% lower seed weight (6.88 g) than hand-pollinated controls (11.25 g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total phenolic content increased by 73%.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
PGRe1
Outcome
total phenolic contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
73%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total phenolic content and antioxidant activity increased by 73% and 29%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–923 · show in text ↑
t0

“muskmelon through plant growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–71 · show in text ↑
t1

“muskmelon through plant growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“PGR-induced fruits were 8.2% heavier (1.05 kg) and had 39% lower seed weight (6.88 g) than hand-pollinated controls (11.25 g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Antioxidant activity increased by 29%.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
PGRe1
Outcome
antioxidant activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
29%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total phenolic content and antioxidant activity increased by 73% and 29%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–923 · show in text ↑
t0

“muskmelon through plant growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–71 · show in text ↑
t1

“muskmelon through plant growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“PGR-induced fruits were 8.2% heavier (1.05 kg) and had 39% lower seed weight (6.88 g) than hand-pollinated controls (11.25 g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PPO and POD activities were significantly reduced.

Taxon
muskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
PGRe1
Gene
PPO and PODe0
Outcome
PPO and POD activitiese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Enzymatic browning indicators, including PPO and POD activities, were significantly reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1015 · show in text ↑
t0

“muskmelon through plant growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–71 · show in text ↑
t1

“muskmelon through plant growth regulators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–71 · show in text ↑
e1

“PGR-induced fruits were 8.2% heavier (1.05 kg) and had 39% lower seed weight (6.88 g) than hand-pollinated controls (11.25 g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 638–764 · show in text ↑

class · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.