Paper · 2026 · Scientific Reports

Biochemical and agronomic responses of guar to nitrogen, Bradyrhizobium inoculation and deficit irrigation under arid and semi-arid conditions

Gholamali Akbari; Saeed Norouzi; Iraj Alahdadi; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The present study aimed to investigate the effects of various levels of chemical nitrogen fertilizer and inoculation with different strains of Bradyrhizobium japonicum on several phenological, quantitative, qualitative, and fodder-related characteristics of guar ( Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.) under varying water-deficit regimes. A two-year field experiment (2021–2022) was conducted as a split-factorial arrangement based on a randomized complete block design with three replications to evaluate the interactive effects of nitrogen fertilization (0, 50, and 100 kg ha − 1 ) and seed inoculation with strains RS-150 and RS-153 under different irrigation regimes. Deficit irrigation significantly reduced grain yield, while full irrigation × 100 kg N ha − 1 yielded the highest GY (3658.2 kg ha − 1 ) and severe deficit × no N applicatopn the lowest (1017.8 kg ha − 1 ). Application of 100 kg N ha − 1 increased GY by 30.99% compared with the control. Inoculation with RS-153 enhanced grain number per m² and 1000-grain weight by 14.41% and 14.54%, respectively, relative to non-inoculated plants. Full irrigation also increased grain protein content by up to 22.19% compared with severe deficit. Soluble sugars accumulated under water stress, reaching 490.16 µg g − 1 DW under deficit irrigation × 100 kg N ha − 1 × RS-150, indicating osmotic adjustment. Crude protein, metabolizable energy, and dry matter digestibility were further improved under full irrigation and higher nitrogen supply. Overall, integrated nitrogen management and rhizobial inoculation partially mitigated drought-induced yield reductions and improved the forage quality of guar under semi-arid conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation significantly reduced grain yield.

Treatment
Deficit irrigatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deficit irrigation significantly reduced grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–724 · show in text ↑
t0

“guar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation with 100 kg N ha − 1 produced the highest grain yield, 3658.2 kg ha − 1.

Treatment
full irrigation × 100 kg N ha − 1e0
Outcome
GYe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3658.2 kg ha − 1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“full irrigation × 100 kg N ha − 1 yielded the highest GY (3658.2 kg ha − 1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–808 · show in text ↑
t0

“guar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe deficit without nitrogen produced the lowest grain yield, 1017.8 kg ha − 1.

Treatment
severe deficit × no N applicatopne0
Outcome
loweste0
Direction
loweste0
Value
1017.8 kg ha − 1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“severe deficit × no N applicatopn the lowest (1017.8 kg ha − 1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–877 · show in text ↑
t0

“guar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100 kg N ha − 1 raised grain yield by 30.99% relative to control.

Treatment
100 kg N ha − 1e0
Outcome
GYe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
30.99%e0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 100 kg N ha − 1 increased GY by 30.99% compared with the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“guar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RS-153 inoculation increased grain number per m² by 14.41%.

Treatment
Inoculation with RS-153e0
Interactor
RS-153e0symbiont
Outcome
grain number per m²e0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
14.41%e0
Comparator
non-inoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with RS-153 enhanced grain number per m² and 1000-grain weight by 14.41% and 14.54%, respectively, relative to non-inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“guar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RS-153 inoculation increased 1000-grain weight by 14.54%.

Treatment
Inoculation with RS-153e0
Interactor
RS-153e0symbiont
Outcome
1000-grain weighte0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
14.54%e0
Comparator
non-inoculated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with RS-153 enhanced grain number per m² and 1000-grain weight by 14.41% and 14.54%, respectively, relative to non-inoculated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1104 · show in text ↑
t0

“guar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation increased grain protein content by up to 22.19% relative to severe deficit.

Treatment
Full irrigatione0
Outcome
grain protein contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
up to 22.19%e0
Comparator
severe deficite0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Full irrigation also increased grain protein content by up to 22.19% compared with severe deficit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1203 · show in text ↑
t0

“guar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress increased soluble sugars, reaching 490.16 µg g − 1 DW under deficit irrigation, nitrogen and RS-150.

Treatment
deficit irrigation × 100 kg N ha − 1 × RS-150e0
Interactor
RS-150e0symbiont
Outcome
Soluble sugarse0
Direction
accumulatede0
Value
490.16 µg g − 1 DWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soluble sugars accumulated under water stress, reaching 490.16 µg g − 1 DW under deficit irrigation × 100 kg N ha − 1 × RS-150”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1331 · show in text ↑
t0

“guar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full irrigation and higher nitrogen improved crude protein, metabolizable energy and dry matter digestibility.

Treatment
full irrigation and higher nitrogen supplye0
Outcome
Crude protein, metabolizable energy, and dry matter digestibilitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cyamopsis tetragonoloba
Cyamopsis tetragonoloba · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crude protein, metabolizable energy, and dry matter digestibility were further improved under full irrigation and higher nitrogen supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1500 · show in text ↑
t0

“guar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–43 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 29 positive, 1 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

irrigation · quality: protein · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.