Paper · 2026 · Selcuk Journal of Agricultural and Food Sciences

Effects of Animal Manures and Mesorhizobium ciceri Applications on the Growth and Nodulation of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under Siirt Ecological Conditions

Muhammed Melik Apaydın; Özge Uçar

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of different organic fertilizers and Mesorhizobium ciceri inoculation on seedling growth and nodulation traits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). The experiment was carried out during the 2023–2024 growing season at the experimental fields of Siirt University Faculty of Agriculture, arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Solid worm manure, sheep, cattle, and poultry manures were applied at different rates, while a peat-based Mesorhizobium ciceri inoculant was used as microbial fertilizer through seed coating. The measured traits included plant height, number of primary and secondary branches, shoot fresh and dry weights, root length, root fresh and dry weights, nodule number, and nodule fresh and dry weights. Results indicated that the combination of organic and microbial fertilizers significantly enhanced plant growth and nodulation compared to the control and sole applications. Particularly, the Mesorhizobium ciceri + 200 kg da⁻¹ worm manure treatment achieved the highest values for root traits and nodulation parameters. The findings suggest that the integrated use of organic manures and biofertilizers provides a sustainable alternative to chemical fertilization, enhances nitrogen use efficiency, and supports environmentally friendly production systems in chickpea cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined organic and microbial fertilizers significantly enhanced chickpea plant growth relative to controls and sole applications.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
combination of organic and microbial fertilizerse0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
the control and sole applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of organic and microbial fertilizers significantly enhanced plant growth and nodulation compared to the control and sole applications.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined organic and microbial fertilizers significantly enhanced chickpea nodulation relative to controls and sole applications.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
combination of organic and microbial fertilizerse0
Outcome
nodulatione0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
the control and sole applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of organic and microbial fertilizers significantly enhanced plant growth and nodulation compared to the control and sole applications.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–973 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesorhizobium ciceri with 200 kg da⁻¹ worm manure gave the highest chickpea root trait values.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Mesorhizobium ciceri + 200 kg da⁻¹ worm manure treatmente0
Interactor
Mesorhizobium ciceriMesorhizobium cicerie0symbiont
Outcome
root traitse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Mesorhizobium ciceri + 200 kg da⁻¹ worm manure treatment achieved the highest values for root traits and nodulation parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1119 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesorhizobium ciceri with 200 kg da⁻¹ worm manure gave the highest chickpea nodulation parameter values.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Mesorhizobium ciceri + 200 kg da⁻¹ worm manure treatmente0
Interactor
Mesorhizobium ciceriMesorhizobium cicerie0symbiont
Outcome
nodulation parameterse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Mesorhizobium ciceri + 200 kg da⁻¹ worm manure treatment achieved the highest values for root traits and nodulation parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 988–1119 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–125 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest integrated manures and biofertilizers as a sustainable chemical fertilizer alternative for chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
sustainable alternative to chemical fertilizatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the integrated use of organic manures and biofertilizers provides a sustainable alternative to chemical fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–125 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest integrated fertilizers enhance nitrogen use efficiency in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiencye0
Direction
enhancese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhances nitrogen use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–125 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest integrated fertilization supports environmentally friendly chickpea production.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
environmentally friendly production systemse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“supports environmentally friendly production systems in chickpea cultivation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1380 · show in text ↑

Mesorhizobium ciceri · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Mesorhizobium ciceri · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

48 papers: 43 positive, 5 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 99 positive, 6 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.