Paper · 2026 · Plant Genetic Resources

Multi-year characterization of almond ( Prunus amygdalus ) landraces and hybrids under recurrent drought: Identification of key traits for pre-breeding and crop improvement

Hicham Aboumadane; Lahcen Hssaini; Jamila Bahhou; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Recurrent drought increasingly threatens almond production in Mediterranean and semi-arid regions, highlighting the need to exploit plant genetic resources with stable adaptive traits. This study reports a 3-year multi-genotypic evaluation of 41 almond genetic resources grown under rainfed conditions in a semi-arid environment characterized by interannual rainfall variability. Significant genotypic and interannual variability was observed across morphological, physiological and biochemical traits. Chlorophyll content ( r = 0.7 with PC1; CV < 12%) emerged as a stable primary discriminant trait. Leaf nitrogen content, wood density, yield and leaf area also contributed significantly to genotype differentiation in multivariate analyses, together explaining 60% of total variance in the first principal component. A two-level hierarchical classification consistently separated tolerant, intermediate and sensitive genotypes. Among the evaluated genetic resources, ‘Princesse n° 3’, ‘Ferragnes*princesse 23’, ‘F1 melange 68/2’, ‘L 158’, ‘II A 7’, ‘(486*217)16’ and ‘GN9’ were identified as high-performing and drought-tolerant genotypes, highlighting their potential value for almond breeding and conservation programmes. This integrative, multi-year phenotypic approach provides a robust framework for identifying and utilizing drought-resilient almond genetic resources.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Morphological, physiological and biochemical traits varied significantly by genotype and year.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcist0
Outcome
morphological, physiological and biochemical traitse0
Direction
variabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant genotypic and interannual variability was observed across morphological, physiological and biochemical traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–510 · show in text ↑
t0

“almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll content was a stable primary discriminant, with r = 0.7 with PC1 and CV < 12%.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcist0
Outcome
Chlorophyll contente0
Value
r = 0.7e0
Qualifier
CV < 12%e0
Comparator
PC1e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll content ( r = 0.7 with PC1; CV < 12%) emerged as a stable primary discriminant trait”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–608 · show in text ↑
t0

“almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf nitrogen content, wood density, yield and leaf area contributed to genotype differentiation, explaining 60% of PC1 variance together.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcist0
Organ / stage
Leafe0
Outcome
genotype differentiatione0
Value
60%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf nitrogen content, wood density, yield and leaf area also contributed significantly to genotype differentiation in multivariate analyses, together explaining 60% of total variance in the first principal component”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hierarchical classification separated tolerant, intermediate and sensitive genotypes.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcist0
Outcome
separated tolerant, intermediate and sensitive genotypese0
Comparator
tolerant, intermediate and sensitive genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A two-level hierarchical classification consistently separated tolerant, intermediate and sensitive genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–937 · show in text ↑
t0

“almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven named genetic resources were identified as high-performing drought-tolerant genotypes.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcist0
Material
‘Princesse n° 3’, ‘Ferragnes*princesse 23’, ‘F1 melange 68/2’, ‘L 158’, ‘II A 7’, ‘(486*217)16’ and ‘GN9’e0
Outcome
high-performing and drought-tolerant genotypese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Princesse n° 3’, ‘Ferragnes*princesse 23’, ‘F1 melange 68/2’, ‘L 158’, ‘II A 7’, ‘(486*217)16’ and ‘GN9’ were identified as high-performing and drought-tolerant genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“almond”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–37 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The identified genotypes have potential value for almond breeding and conservation.

Taxon
almondPrunus dulcise1
Outcome
potential value for almond breeding and conservation programmese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highlighting their potential value for almond breeding and conservation programmes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1233 · show in text ↑
e1

“almond breeding and conservation programmes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1233 · show in text ↑