Paper · 2026 · Journal of soil science and plant nutrition

Unveiling Role of Poultry Litter-Derived Biochar and Boron on Chickpea Growth, Soil Chemistry, Nutrient Availability and Heavy Metal Accumulation

Fatih Çığ; Ferit Sönmez; Figen Ceritoglu; et al.

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study explores the combined effects of biochar and boron on chickpea growth, soil chemistry and nutrient composition offering a novel approach to sustainable agriculture. A controlled experiment was conducted using biochar derived from poultry litter at four doses (0%, 2%, 4%, and 8%) and boron supplementation at three levels (0, 1 and 2 mg kg− 1 boron). Growth attributes, soil chemistry, macro and micro nutrient status and heavy metals accumulation were determined in chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Phosphorus, potassium, magnesium and calcium uptake were promoted with higher biochar doses by 20.2%, 16.6%, 20.2% and 25% over control, respectively. Similarly, boron and copper picked with 8% of biochar, while nickel had the highest value with 2% of it. Boron treatments increased magnesium and manganese uptake, whereas they reduced calcium and copper accumulations in plant tissues. biochar inhibited lead, chromium and aluminum absorption at low doses (2%), but increased at higher doses. The highest phosphorus concentration (2458 mg kg⁻¹) was observed with 8% biochar, while magnesium and potassium contents increased by 28.9% and 15.6%, respectively. Principal component analysis showed strong positive correlations between heavy metal uptake and biochar application, highlighting potential shifts in bioavailability. Plant growth parameters responded positively to biochar but negatively to excessive boron. Soil EC increased by 47% under 8% biochar, underscoring the need for careful application to avoid salinity issues. Biochar and boron application rates can promote soil nutrient bioavailability and chickpea growth, and restrict heavy metal accumulation in plants. However, high applications limit plant growth due to intense heavy metal accumulation and ion imbalances in the plant. The application of 2% biochar and 1 mg kg− 1 boron are considered optimal because it enhances nutrient uptake, minimizes heavy metal accumulation, and maintains low salinity risk.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher biochar doses promoted chickpea phosphorus uptake by 20.2% over control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
higher biochar dosese1
Outcome
Phosphoruse1
Direction
promotede1
Value
20.2%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–504 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phosphorus, potassium, magnesium and calcium uptake were promoted with higher biochar doses by 20.2%, 16.6%, 20.2% and 25% over control, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–656 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher biochar doses promoted chickpea potassium uptake by 16.6% over control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
higher biochar dosese1
Outcome
potassiume1
Direction
promotede1
Value
16.6%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–504 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phosphorus, potassium, magnesium and calcium uptake were promoted with higher biochar doses by 20.2%, 16.6%, 20.2% and 25% over control, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–656 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher biochar doses promoted chickpea magnesium uptake by 20.2% over control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
higher biochar dosese1
Outcome
magnesiume1
Direction
promotede1
Value
20.2%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–504 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phosphorus, potassium, magnesium and calcium uptake were promoted with higher biochar doses by 20.2%, 16.6%, 20.2% and 25% over control, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–656 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher biochar doses promoted chickpea calcium uptake by 25% over control.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
higher biochar dosese1
Outcome
calciume1
Direction
promotede1
Value
25%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–504 · show in text ↑
e1

“Phosphorus, potassium, magnesium and calcium uptake were promoted with higher biochar doses by 20.2%, 16.6%, 20.2% and 25% over control, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–656 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight percent biochar increased chickpea boron and copper uptake.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
8% of biochare1
Outcome
boron and coppere1
Direction
pickede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–504 · show in text ↑
e1

“boron and copper picked with 8% of biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–710 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nickel reached its highest value at 2% biochar.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
2% of ite1
Outcome
nickele1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–504 · show in text ↑
e1

“nickel had the highest value with 2% of it”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–760 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron treatments increased chickpea magnesium and manganese uptake.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
Boron treatmentse1
Outcome
magnesium and manganese uptakee1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–504 · show in text ↑
e1

“Boron treatments increased magnesium and manganese uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–819 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Boron treatments reduced calcium and copper accumulation in chickpea tissue.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Organ / stage
plant tissuese1
Treatment
Boron treatmentse1
Outcome
calcium and copper accumulations in plant tissuese1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–504 · show in text ↑
e1

“Boron treatments increased magnesium and manganese uptake, whereas they reduced calcium and copper accumulations in plant tissues.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low dose biochar inhibited lead, chromium and aluminum absorption.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
low doses (2%)e1
Outcome
lead, chromium and aluminum absorptione1
Direction
inhibitede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–504 · show in text ↑
e1

“biochar inhibited lead, chromium and aluminum absorption at low doses (2%), but increased at higher doses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–999 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher dose biochar increased lead, chromium and aluminum absorption.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
higher dosese1
Outcome
lead, chromium and aluminum absorptione1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–504 · show in text ↑
e1

“biochar inhibited lead, chromium and aluminum absorption at low doses (2%), but increased at higher doses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–999 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight percent biochar gave the highest phosphorus concentration of 2458 mg kg⁻¹.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
8% biochare1
Outcome
phosphorus concentratione1
Direction
higheste1
Value
2458 mg kg⁻¹e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–504 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest phosphorus concentration (2458 mg kg⁻¹) was observed with 8% biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1080 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnesium content increased by 28.9%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
magnesiume1
Direction
increasede1
Value
28.9%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–504 · show in text ↑
e1

“magnesium and potassium contents increased by 28.9% and 15.6%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1163 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium content increased by 15.6%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Outcome
potassiume1
Direction
increasede1
Value
15.6%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–504 · show in text ↑
e1

“magnesium and potassium contents increased by 28.9% and 15.6%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1163 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy metal uptake was positively correlated with biochar application.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
biochar applicatione1
Outcome
heavy metal uptakee1
Direction
positive correlationse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–504 · show in text ↑
e1

“Principal component analysis showed strong positive correlations between heavy metal uptake and biochar application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1280 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea growth parameters responded positively to biochar.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
biochare1
Outcome
Plant growth parameterse1
Direction
positivelye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–504 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant growth parameters responded positively to biochar but negatively to excessive boron.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1422 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chickpea growth parameters responded negatively to excessive boron.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
excessive borone1
Outcome
Plant growth parameterse1
Direction
negativelye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–504 · show in text ↑
e1

“Plant growth parameters responded positively to biochar but negatively to excessive boron.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1422 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight percent biochar increased soil electrical conductivity by 47%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
8% biochare1
Outcome
Soil ECe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
47%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–504 · show in text ↑
e1

“Soil EC increased by 47% under 8% biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1464 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute limited plant growth at high application rates to heavy metal accumulation and ion imbalance.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
high applicationse1
Outcome
plant growthe1
Qualifier
intense heavy metal accumulation and ion imbalances in the plante1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–504 · show in text ↑
e1

“high applications limit plant growth due to intense heavy metal accumulation and ion imbalances in the plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1695–1803 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider 2% biochar optimal for nutrient uptake, metal accumulation and salinity risk.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
2% biochare1
Outcome
enhances nutrient uptake, minimizes heavy metal accumulation, and maintains low salinity riske1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–504 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of 2% biochar and 1 mg kg− 1 boron are considered optimal because it enhances nutrient uptake, minimizes heavy metal accumulation, and maintains low salinity risk.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1805–1984 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors consider 1 mg kg− 1 boron optimal for nutrient uptake, metal accumulation and salinity risk.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
1 mg kg− 1 borone1
Outcome
enhances nutrient uptake, minimizes heavy metal accumulation, and maintains low salinity riske1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–504 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of 2% biochar and 1 mg kg− 1 boron are considered optimal because it enhances nutrient uptake, minimizes heavy metal accumulation, and maintains low salinity risk.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1805–1984 · show in text ↑

boron atom · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

21 papers: 18 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

boron atom · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

biochar · soil: chemistry · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

biochar · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

biochar · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.