Paper · 2026 · Archives of Current Research International

Field Performance Evaluation of a Mini Tractor-Operated Oscillating Type Intercultural Weeder for Rice

D. Anil Kumar; B. Sanjeeva Reddy; L. Edukondalu

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Cone weeders are developed for weeding operation particularly in paddy cultivation. One of the major constraints in using these hand-operated weeders is the physical effort that is needed to push the implement in the slush paddy fields and highly resistant clay soil. To overcome these problems, the design of intercultural equipment with an oscillating mechanism is necessary. This study aims to evaluate the performance of a Tractor-Operated Oscillating Intercultural Weeder for Rice. The selected paddy variety was raised in plastic trays, and the seeds were uniformly sown in trays using an automatic seed sowing machine. At the age of 21 days, rice seedlings were transplanted with a self-propelled riding type 6-row transplanter. The type of soil under which the crop was raised was red sandy loam (sand, silt and clay per cent were 52.79, 24.51 and 22.7, respectively). The row-to-row spacing of transplanted seedlings was 30 cm. The performance evaluation of the developed mini tractor-operated oscillating intercultural equipment was conducted in field conditions. The observations on weeding efficiency, plant damage, field capacity, and performance index were recorded. The performance of the machine was carried out under field conditions at 25 DAT. The weeding efficiency of the machine was observed as 81.39 per cent. The plant damage with machine was observed as 6 per cent. The field capacity and field efficiency of the machine were 0.30 ha h-1 and 79.12 per cent, respectively. The wheel slip of the low-horsepower tractor when operating in a rice field with the machine was found to be 12.8 per cent, which is within the permissible limit. The performance index of the machine was observed to be 104.32. The cost of weeding with a developed machine was Rs. 1703 ha-1 when compared with the manual traditional weeding practice of Rs. 3050 ha-1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The weeder achieved a weeding efficiency of 81.39 per cent in the rice field.

Outcome
weeding efficiencye1
Value
81.39 per cente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Intercultural Weeder for Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“The weeding efficiency of the machine was observed as 81.39 per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1330 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant damage with the weeder was 6 per cent.

Outcome
plant damagee1
Value
6 per cente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Intercultural Weeder for Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“The plant damage with machine was observed as 6 per cent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1332–1388 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The field capacity of the weeder was 0.30 ha h-1.

Outcome
field capacitye1
Value
0.30 ha h-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Intercultural Weeder for Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“The field capacity and field efficiency of the machine were 0.30 ha h-1 and 79.12 per cent, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1494 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The field efficiency of the weeder was 79.12 per cent.

Outcome
field efficiencye1
Value
79.12 per cente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Intercultural Weeder for Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“The field capacity and field efficiency of the machine were 0.30 ha h-1 and 79.12 per cent, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1390–1494 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheel slip of the low-horsepower tractor operating the weeder in the rice field was 12.8 per cent, within the permissible limit.

Outcome
wheel slipe1
Value
12.8 per cente1
Qualifier
within the permissible limite1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Intercultural Weeder for Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“The wheel slip of the low-horsepower tractor when operating in a rice field with the machine was found to be 12.8 per cent, which is within the permissible limit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1657 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The performance index of the weeder was 104.32.

Outcome
performance indexe1
Value
104.32e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Intercultural Weeder for Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“The performance index of the machine was observed to be 104.32”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1659–1721 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weeding with the developed machine cost Rs. 1703 ha-1 compared with Rs. 3050 ha-1 for manual traditional weeding.

Outcome
cost of weedinge1
Value
Rs. 1703 ha-1e1
Qualifier
Rs. 3050 ha-1e1
Comparator
manual traditional weeding practicee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Intercultural Weeder for Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“The cost of weeding with a developed machine was Rs. 1703 ha-1 when compared with the manual traditional weeding practice of Rs. 3050 ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1723–1861 · show in text ↑