Paper · 2026 · npj Sustainable Agriculture

On-farm agrivoltaic impacts on main crop yield: the roles of shade avoidance, cultivation practices, and varieties

Noriko Maruyama; Mizuki Nozawa; Hironori Tomioka; et al.

11
claims
18
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Agrivoltaic systems, which integrate agricultural production with photovoltaic energy generation, have garnered attention for their dual-use potential. However, few studies have addressed yield variability of major staple crops, and their morphological and physiological traits in agrivoltaic systems. This study investigated yield performance and shade avoidance responses of three major Asian staple crops, rice, soybean, and sweet potato in agrivoltaic systems. We also assessed the influence of cultivation management practices, such as cultivar selection, weed control, and micronutrient fertilization, which have been overlooked in previous studies, using organically grown sweet potato. Field experiments for rice, soybean, and sweet potato were conducted in 2024, while organic sweet potato experiments in 2023–2024. Our findings revealed substantial inter- and intraspecific variation in yield responses to shading. Rice grain yield remained stable under 27% shading, whereas soybean seed yield decreased by 30% under 33% shading. Conventional sweet potato tuber yield decreased by 40% under 31% shading and further under 49% shading. Organic sweet potato tuber yield in different cultivars decreased by 26–51% in 2023 and 18–65% in 2024 under 40% shading. All crops exhibited shade avoidance responses in agrivoltaic systems, such as increased plant height and elevated shoot-to-root ratios. Among sweet potato cultivars, the degree of yield reduction was linked to the intensity of shade avoidance responses. In contrast, neither weed control timing nor micronutrient fertilization significantly affected yield. These findings underscore the importance of understanding crop- and cultivar- specific morphological and physiological responses to ensure stable production in agrivoltaic systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice grain yield remained stable under 27% shading.

Treatment
27% shadinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
remained stablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice grain yield remained stable under 27% shading”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–975 · show in text ↑
e7

“three major Asian staple crops, rice, soybean, and sweet potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–440 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean seed yield decreased by 30% under 33% shading.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
33% shadinge1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
30%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“soybean seed yield decreased by 30% under 33% shading”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1038 · show in text ↑
e7

“three major Asian staple crops, rice, soybean, and sweet potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–440 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional sweet potato tuber yield decreased by 40% under 31% shading.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase2
Treatment
31% shadinge2
Outcome
tuber yielde2
Direction
decreasede2
Value
40%e2
Qualifier
Conventionale2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Conventional sweet potato tuber yield decreased by 40% under 31% shading and further under 49% shading”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1142 · show in text ↑
e7

“three major Asian staple crops, rice, soybean, and sweet potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–440 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional sweet potato tuber yield decreased further under 49% shading.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase2
Treatment
49% shadinge2
Outcome
tuber yielde2
Direction
decreasede2
Qualifier
Conventionale2

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Conventional sweet potato tuber yield decreased by 40% under 31% shading and further under 49% shading”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic sweet potato tuber yield decreased by 26–51% in 2023 under 40% shading, varying by cultivar.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase3
Treatment
40% shadinge3
Outcome
tuber yielde3
Direction
decreasede3
Value
26–51%e3
Qualifier
Organice3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Organic sweet potato tuber yield in different cultivars decreased by 26–51% in 2023 and 18–65% in 2024 under 40% shading”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic sweet potato tuber yield decreased by 18–65% in 2024 under 40% shading, varying by cultivar.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase3
Treatment
40% shadinge3
Outcome
tuber yielde3
Direction
decreasede3
Value
18–65%e3
Qualifier
Organice3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“Organic sweet potato tuber yield in different cultivars decreased by 26–51% in 2023 and 18–65% in 2024 under 40% shading”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1264 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All crops increased plant height under agrivoltaic systems as a shade avoidance response.

Taxon
rice, soybean, and sweet potatoGlycine maxIpomoea batatasOryza sativae7
Treatment
agrivoltaic systemse4
Outcome
plant heighte4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“All crops exhibited shade avoidance responses in agrivoltaic systems, such as increased plant height and elevated shoot-to-root ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1400 · show in text ↑
e7

“three major Asian staple crops, rice, soybean, and sweet potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–440 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All crops elevated shoot-to-root ratios under agrivoltaic systems as a shade avoidance response.

Taxon
rice, soybean, and sweet potatoGlycine maxIpomoea batatasOryza sativae7
Treatment
agrivoltaic systemse4
Outcome
shoot-to-root ratiose4
Direction
elevatede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“All crops exhibited shade avoidance responses in agrivoltaic systems, such as increased plant height and elevated shoot-to-root ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1400 · show in text ↑
e7

“three major Asian staple crops, rice, soybean, and sweet potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–440 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among sweet potato cultivars, the degree of yield reduction was linked to the intensity of shade avoidance responses.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase5
Material
sweet potato cultivarse5
Outcome
degree of yield reductione5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Among sweet potato cultivars, the degree of yield reduction was linked to the intensity of shade avoidance responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1518 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control timing did not significantly affect yield of sweet potato.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase2
Treatment
weed control timinge6
Outcome
yielde6
Direction
no_changeinferrede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“neither weed control timing nor micronutrient fertilization significantly affected yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1621 · show in text ↑
e2

“Conventional sweet potato tuber yield decreased by 40% under 31% shading and further under 49% shading”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient fertilization did not significantly affect yield of sweet potato.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase2
Treatment
micronutrient fertilizatione6
Outcome
yielde6
Direction
no_changeinferrede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“neither weed control timing nor micronutrient fertilization significantly affected yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1621 · show in text ↑
e2

“Conventional sweet potato tuber yield decreased by 40% under 31% shading and further under 49% shading”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1142 · show in text ↑

shade · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

54 papers: 6 positive, 48 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

micronutrient · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

shade · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

herbicide · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 5 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

shade · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

71 papers: 15 positive, 56 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

fertilization · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 126 positive, 19 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 126 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.