Abstract
The amendment of metagenomic bacterial community in soybean-cultivated soils to enhance phytoestrogen levels in soybean roots through communicating with mixture of culturable rhizospheric bacteria (RB) were rarely studied. RB from soybean roots and soybean-cultivated soils were isolated and applied to soybean plants. Treated soybean plants were divided into three groups: control (CTL), soybean root RB (SRR), and soybean-cultivated soil RB (SSR). Each group had a distinct influence on the metagenomic bacterial community of the soybean rhizosphere. The α-proteobacteria were the dominant class in all three groups, although SRR was enriched with Actinomycetes, Fimbriimonadia, and γ-proteobacteria, while SSR was enriched with Bacilli, Chitinophagia, and Gemmatimonadia classes. Additionally, at the significantly species level, SRR was enriched with Arthrobacter sp. and Azospirillum lipoferum, while SSR was enriched with Bradyrhizobium sp. and Rhizobium sp. Moreover, the RB treatment significantly affected the root metabolite composition. In the SSR-treated group, phenylalanine (18.80-47.81 mg/100 g) and tyrosine (8.03-21.98 mg/100 g) tended to be significantly enhanced. Additionally, secondary metabolites, such as isoflavones, total phenolics, and total flavonoids, were also significantly affected by the RB treatment; secondary metabolites were the highest in the SSR-treated group. These changes in metabolites also affected radical scavenging activities, with the SSR-treated group displaying significantly increased activities compared to the other groups. As a result, DPPH increased from 32.44 % to 47.21 % and ABTS from 53.41 % to 74.23 %. Therefore, RB treatment can influence the bacteria and root metabolite compositions within the soybean rhizosphere, revealing its potential applications in soybean productivity.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
The α-proteobacteria were the dominant class in the rhizosphere of all three soybean groups.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Outcome
- dominant classe2
- Qualifier
- α-proteobacteriae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Treated soybean plants were divided into three groups: control (CTL), soybean root RB (SRR), and soybean-cultivated soil RB (SSR)”
e2“The α-proteobacteria were the dominant class in all three groups, although SRR was enriched with Actinomycetes, Fimbriimonadia, and γ-proteobacteria, while SSR was enriched with Bacilli, Chitinophagia, and Gemmatimonadia classes”
Claim · model-written summary
The SRR treatment enriched Actinomycetes, Fimbriimonadia and γ-proteobacteria in the soybean rhizosphere.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- soybean root RB (SRR)e0
- Outcome
- Actinomycetes, Fimbriimonadia, and γ-proteobacteriae2
- Direction
- enrichede2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Treated soybean plants were divided into three groups: control (CTL), soybean root RB (SRR), and soybean-cultivated soil RB (SSR)”
e2“The α-proteobacteria were the dominant class in all three groups, although SRR was enriched with Actinomycetes, Fimbriimonadia, and γ-proteobacteria, while SSR was enriched with Bacilli, Chitinophagia, and Gemmatimonadia classes”
Claim · model-written summary
The SSR treatment enriched Bacilli, Chitinophagia and Gemmatimonadia in the soybean rhizosphere.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- soybean-cultivated soil RB (SSR)e0
- Outcome
- Bacilli, Chitinophagia, and Gemmatimonadiae2
- Direction
- enrichede2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Treated soybean plants were divided into three groups: control (CTL), soybean root RB (SRR), and soybean-cultivated soil RB (SSR)”
e2“The α-proteobacteria were the dominant class in all three groups, although SRR was enriched with Actinomycetes, Fimbriimonadia, and γ-proteobacteria, while SSR was enriched with Bacilli, Chitinophagia, and Gemmatimonadia classes”
Claim · model-written summary
The SRR treatment enriched Arthrobacter sp. and Azospirillum lipoferum at species level.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- soybean root RB (SRR)e0
- Interactor
- Arthrobacter sp.
Arthrobactere3symbiont - Second interactor
- Azospirillum lipoferumAzospirillum lipoferume3symbiont
- Outcome
- Arthrobacter sp. and Azospirillum lipoferume3
- Direction
- enrichede3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Treated soybean plants were divided into three groups: control (CTL), soybean root RB (SRR), and soybean-cultivated soil RB (SSR)”
e3“Additionally, at the significantly species level, SRR was enriched with Arthrobacter sp. and Azospirillum lipoferum, while SSR was enriched with Bradyrhizobium sp. and Rhizobium sp.”
Claim · model-written summary
The SSR treatment enriched Bradyrhizobium sp. and Rhizobium sp. at species level.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- soybean-cultivated soil RB (SSR)e0
- Interactor
- Bradyrhizobium sp.
Bradyrhizobiume3symbiont - Outcome
- Bradyrhizobium sp. and Rhizobium sp.e3
- Direction
- enrichede3
RhizobiumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Treated soybean plants were divided into three groups: control (CTL), soybean root RB (SRR), and soybean-cultivated soil RB (SSR)”
e3“Additionally, at the significantly species level, SRR was enriched with Arthrobacter sp. and Azospirillum lipoferum, while SSR was enriched with Bradyrhizobium sp. and Rhizobium sp.”
Claim · model-written summary
Phenylalanine in soybean roots was enhanced in the SSR-treated group.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- SSR-treated groupe5
- Outcome
- phenylalaninee5
- Direction
- enhancede5
- Value
- 18.80-47.81 mg/100 ge5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Treated soybean plants were divided into three groups: control (CTL), soybean root RB (SRR), and soybean-cultivated soil RB (SSR)”
e5“In the SSR-treated group, phenylalanine (18.80-47.81 mg/100 g) and tyrosine (8.03-21.98 mg/100 g) tended to be significantly enhanced”
Claim · model-written summary
Tyrosine in soybean roots was enhanced in the SSR-treated group.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- SSR-treated groupe5
- Outcome
- tyrosinee5
- Direction
- enhancede5
- Value
- 8.03-21.98 mg/100 ge5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Treated soybean plants were divided into three groups: control (CTL), soybean root RB (SRR), and soybean-cultivated soil RB (SSR)”
e5“In the SSR-treated group, phenylalanine (18.80-47.81 mg/100 g) and tyrosine (8.03-21.98 mg/100 g) tended to be significantly enhanced”
Claim · model-written summary
The RB treatment significantly affected isoflavones, total phenolics and total flavonoids in soybean roots.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- RB treatmente6
- Outcome
- isoflavones, total phenolics, and total flavonoidse6
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Treated soybean plants were divided into three groups: control (CTL), soybean root RB (SRR), and soybean-cultivated soil RB (SSR)”
e6“Additionally, secondary metabolites, such as isoflavones, total phenolics, and total flavonoids, were also significantly affected by the RB treatment; secondary metabolites were the highest in the SSR-treated group”
Claim · model-written summary
Secondary metabolites in soybean roots were highest in the SSR-treated group.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- SSR-treated groupe6
- Outcome
- secondary metabolitese6
- Direction
- the higheste6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Treated soybean plants were divided into three groups: control (CTL), soybean root RB (SRR), and soybean-cultivated soil RB (SSR)”
e6“Additionally, secondary metabolites, such as isoflavones, total phenolics, and total flavonoids, were also significantly affected by the RB treatment; secondary metabolites were the highest in the SSR-treated group”
Claim · model-written summary
Radical scavenging activities were significantly increased in the SSR-treated group compared with the other groups.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- SSR-treated groupe1
- Outcome
- radical scavenging activitiese1
- Direction
- significantly increasede1
- Comparator
- other groupse1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Treated soybean plants were divided into three groups: control (CTL), soybean root RB (SRR), and soybean-cultivated soil RB (SSR)”
e1“These changes in metabolites also affected radical scavenging activities, with the SSR-treated group displaying significantly increased activities compared to the other groups”
Claim · model-written summary
DPPH radical scavenging increased to 47.21 % after the RB treatment.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- RB treatmente6
- Outcome
- DPPHe7
- Direction
- increasede7
- Value
- 47.21 %e7
- Qualifier
- from 32.44 %e7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Treated soybean plants were divided into three groups: control (CTL), soybean root RB (SRR), and soybean-cultivated soil RB (SSR)”
e6“Additionally, secondary metabolites, such as isoflavones, total phenolics, and total flavonoids, were also significantly affected by the RB treatment; secondary metabolites were the highest in the SSR-treated group”
e7“As a result, DPPH increased from 32.44 % to 47.21 % and ABTS from 53.41 % to 74.23 %”
Claim · model-written summary
ABTS radical scavenging increased to 74.23 % after the RB treatment.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- RB treatmente6
- Outcome
- ABTSe7
- Direction
- increasede7
- Value
- 74.23 %e7
- Qualifier
- from 53.41 %e7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Treated soybean plants were divided into three groups: control (CTL), soybean root RB (SRR), and soybean-cultivated soil RB (SSR)”
e6“Additionally, secondary metabolites, such as isoflavones, total phenolics, and total flavonoids, were also significantly affected by the RB treatment; secondary metabolites were the highest in the SSR-treated group”
e7“As a result, DPPH increased from 32.44 % to 47.21 % and ABTS from 53.41 % to 74.23 %”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · quality: phytochemicals · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.