Abstract
The present research study was carried out at Guneid Research Sugar Cane Center during the two seasons of 2014 and 2015.The objective was to investigated the effect of four tillage systems (mouldboard plowing, disc plowing, chisel plowing and disc harrowing) and three irrigation intervals (7, 10, and 14 days). The parameters measured were some crop parameters (germination ratio, root thickness, root number per hectare, leaf weight, root crop yield, polarization or sugar content, estimated recovery sugar and sugar beet production. A split plot design with four replications was used in this study. Different tillage systems significantly (P≤0.05) affected root number per hectare and germination ratio. The maximum value of root number per hectare 62254 roots/hectare, germination ratio (76.2%) and sugar beet production (10 ton/hr) and were given by disc plowing treatment, while the maximum root thickness (35.5 cm) were recorded by chisel plowing treatment and the maximum values of polarization or sugar content (18.6%) and estimated recovery sugar (16.9%) were recorded by disc harrowing treatment. While the minimum values of root crop yield, (58.55 ton/hectare) and germination ratio (66.5%) were given by chisel plowing treatment. Also irrigation intervals significantly (P≤0.05) affected root crop yield, root thickness and sugar beet production. The maximum values of root crop yield (65.45 ton/hectare) and root thickness (35.2 cm) were obtained under an10 days irrigation interval, while the maximum values of sugar beet production (9.71 ton/hectare) was obtained under a 7 days irrigation interval. It was concluded that using disc plowing increased sugar production from sugar beet crops at Guneid Research Sugar Cane Center.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Tillage systems significantly affected root number per hectare and germination ratio.
- Taxon
- Sugar Beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0 - Treatment
- Different tillage systemse0
- Outcome
- root number per hectare and germination ratioe0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Different tillage systems significantly (P≤0.05) affected root number per hectare and germination ratio.”
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Disc plowing gave the maximum root number, 62254 roots/hectare.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- disc plowing treatmente0
- Outcome
- root number per hectaree0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 62254 roots/hectaree0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum value of root number per hectare 62254 roots/hectare, germination ratio (76.2%) and sugar beet production (10 ton/hr) and were given by disc plowing treatment”
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Disc plowing gave the maximum germination ratio, 76.2%.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- disc plowing treatmente0
- Outcome
- germination ratioe0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 76.2%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum value of root number per hectare 62254 roots/hectare, germination ratio (76.2%) and sugar beet production (10 ton/hr) and were given by disc plowing treatment”
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Disc plowing gave the maximum reported sugar beet production, 10 ton/hr.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- disc plowing treatmente0
- Outcome
- sugar beet productione0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 10 ton/hre0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum value of root number per hectare 62254 roots/hectare, germination ratio (76.2%) and sugar beet production (10 ton/hr) and were given by disc plowing treatment”
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Chisel plowing gave maximum root thickness of 35.5 cm.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- chisel plowing treatmente0
- Outcome
- root thicknesse0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 35.5 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the maximum root thickness (35.5 cm) were recorded by chisel plowing treatment”
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Disc harrowing gave maximum sugar content of 18.6%.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- disc harrowing treatmente0
- Outcome
- polarization or sugar contente0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 18.6%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the maximum values of polarization or sugar content (18.6%) and estimated recovery sugar (16.9%) were recorded by disc harrowing treatment”
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Disc harrowing gave maximum estimated recovery sugar of 16.9%.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- disc harrowing treatmente0
- Outcome
- estimated recovery sugare0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 16.9%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the maximum values of polarization or sugar content (18.6%) and estimated recovery sugar (16.9%) were recorded by disc harrowing treatment”
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Chisel plowing gave minimum root crop yield of 58.55 ton/hectare.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- chisel plowing treatmente0
- Outcome
- root crop yielde0
- Direction
- minimume0
- Value
- 58.55 ton/hectaree0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the minimum values of root crop yield, (58.55 ton/hectare) and germination ratio (66.5%) were given by chisel plowing treatment”
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Chisel plowing gave minimum germination ratio of 66.5%.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- chisel plowing treatmente0
- Outcome
- germination ratioe0
- Direction
- minimume0
- Value
- 66.5%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the minimum values of root crop yield, (58.55 ton/hectare) and germination ratio (66.5%) were given by chisel plowing treatment”
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation intervals significantly affected root crop yield, root thickness, and sugar beet production.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- irrigation intervalse0
- Outcome
- root crop yield, root thickness and sugar beet productione0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“irrigation intervals significantly (P≤0.05) affected root crop yield, root thickness and sugar beet production.”
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
A 10 days irrigation interval gave maximum root crop yield of 65.45 ton/hectare.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 10 days irrigation intervale0
- Outcome
- root crop yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 65.45 ton/hectaree0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum values of root crop yield (65.45 ton/hectare) and root thickness (35.2 cm) were obtained under an10 days irrigation interval”
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
A 10 days irrigation interval gave maximum root thickness of 35.2 cm.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 10 days irrigation intervale0
- Outcome
- root thicknesse0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 35.2 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The maximum values of root crop yield (65.45 ton/hectare) and root thickness (35.2 cm) were obtained under an10 days irrigation interval”
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
A 7 days irrigation interval gave maximum sugar beet production of 9.71 ton/hectare.
- Taxon
- Sugar BeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- 7 days irrigation intervale0
- Outcome
- sugar beet productione0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 9.71 ton/hectaree0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the maximum values of sugar beet production (9.71 ton/hectare) was obtained under a 7 days irrigation interval.”
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors concluded that disc plowing increased sugar production at Guneid Research Sugar Cane Center.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- disc plowinge0
- Outcome
- sugar productione0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Setting
- Guneid Research Sugar Cane Centere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It was concluded that using disc plowing increased sugar production from sugar beet crops at Guneid Research Sugar Cane Center.”
t0“Sugar Beet (Beta vulgaris L.)”
The same questions in other papers
(1S)-isoindoline-1-carboxylic acid · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
(1S)-isoindoline-1-carboxylic acid · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
(1S)-isoindoline-1-carboxylic acid · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
irrigation · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
78 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
109 papers more in this group
See all 113 papers →tillage · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →tillage · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
58 papers more in this group
See all 62 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.