Paper · 2026 · Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection

Methyl jasmonate reduces sucking pest populations and increases predator abundance on common bean

Abdurrahman Sami Koca

10
claims
32
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The exogenous application of natural plant defense elicitors represents a promising strategy for alternative pest management. Such treatments enhance plant resistance to herbivores and influences interactions with natural enemies. Methyl jasmonate (MeJA), a key signaling molecule, is known to trigger plant defense mechanisms. In this study, the effects of MeJA on pest and predator populations associated with common bean were evaluated in field experiments conducted in Bolu, Türkiye in 2024 and 2025 using a randomized complete block design, where plants were treated with four MeJA doses (0.5, 1.5, 2.5, and 3.5 mM) at two plant growth stages. Insect populations were monitored weekly using sticky traps, visual inspection, and sweep-net sampling. A total of 14 insect species were recorded including five pests and nine predators. Generalized linear mixed model analysis revealed significant effects of MeJA dose and plant growth stage on pest abundances. The 3.5 mM MeJA dose significantly reduced the abundance of sucking pests across both 2024 and 2025 compared to the control group. In 2024, the strongest reductions were observed in apterous aphid populations (57.3%) and Empoasca decipiens Paoli (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) (35.5%), followed by Thrips tabaci Lindeman (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) (27.0%) and alate aphids (26.1%). In 2025, the suppressive effects were generally more pronounced, with reductions reaching 68.5% in apterous aphids and 62.3% in T. tabaci , alongside significant decreases in alate aphids 50.9% and E. decipiens (47.8%). Additionally, MeJA had a positive influence on predator abundance. Syrphid and coccinellid numbers were significantly higher at the 3.5 mM dose across the entire sampling period, with Coccinellid abundances increasing 3.62-fold in 2024 and 3.17-fold in 2025, and Syrphid abundances increasing 1.66-fold in 2024 and 3.20-fold in 2025 compared to the control group. Chrysoperla carnea Stephens (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) populations were not affected by MeJA concentration. Overall, these findings demonstrate the deterrent effects of MeJA-treated common bean plants on sucking insect pests while enhancing certain predator abundances, emphasizing their potential as a sustainable tool in integrated pest management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 3.5 mM MeJA dose significantly reduced sucking pest abundance on common bean compared with the control group.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
3.5 mM MeJA dosee2
Interactor
sucking pestse2pest
Outcome
abundance of sucking pestse2
Direction
reducede2
Comparator
control groupe2
Setting
Bolu, Türkiyee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“The 3.5 mM MeJA dose significantly reduced the abundance of sucking pests across both 2024 and 2025 compared to the control group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1100 · show in text ↑
e0

“field experiments conducted in Bolu, Türkiye in 2024 and 2025”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–512 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2024 the 3.5 mM MeJA dose gave the strongest reduction in apterous aphid populations, 57.3%.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
3.5 mM MeJA dosee2
Interactor
apterous aphide3pest
Outcome
apterous aphid populationse3
Direction
reductionse3
Value
57.3%e3
Comparator
control groupe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“The 3.5 mM MeJA dose significantly reduced the abundance of sucking pests across both 2024 and 2025 compared to the control group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1100 · show in text ↑
e3

“In 2024, the strongest reductions were observed in apterous aphid populations (57.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2024 the 3.5 mM MeJA dose reduced Empoasca decipiens by 35.5%.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
3.5 mM MeJA dosee2
Interactor
Empoasca decipiens PaoliHebata decipiense4pest
Outcome
Empoasca decipiens Paoli (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae)e4
Direction
reductionse3
Value
35.5%e4
Comparator
control groupe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“The 3.5 mM MeJA dose significantly reduced the abundance of sucking pests across both 2024 and 2025 compared to the control group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1100 · show in text ↑
e3

“In 2024, the strongest reductions were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1149 · show in text ↑
e4

“Empoasca decipiens Paoli (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) (35.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1250 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2024 the 3.5 mM MeJA dose reduced Thrips tabaci by 27.0%.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
3.5 mM MeJA dosee2
Interactor
Thrips tabaci LindemanThrips tabacie4pest
Outcome
Thrips tabaci Lindeman (Thysanoptera: Thripidae)e4
Direction
reductionse3
Value
27.0%e4
Comparator
control groupe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips tabaci
Thrips tabaci · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“The 3.5 mM MeJA dose significantly reduced the abundance of sucking pests across both 2024 and 2025 compared to the control group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1100 · show in text ↑
e3

“In 2024, the strongest reductions were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1149 · show in text ↑
e4

“followed by Thrips tabaci Lindeman (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) (27.0%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2024 the 3.5 mM MeJA dose reduced alate aphids by 26.1%.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
3.5 mM MeJA dosee2
Interactor
alate aphidse4pest
Outcome
alate aphidse4
Direction
reductionse3
Value
26.1%e4
Comparator
control groupe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“The 3.5 mM MeJA dose significantly reduced the abundance of sucking pests across both 2024 and 2025 compared to the control group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1100 · show in text ↑
e3

“In 2024, the strongest reductions were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1149 · show in text ↑
e4

“followed by Thrips tabaci Lindeman (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) (27.0%) and alate aphids (26.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1345 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2025 the 3.5 mM MeJA dose reduced apterous aphids by 68.5%.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
3.5 mM MeJA dosee2
Interactor
apterous aphidse5pest
Outcome
apterous aphidse5
Direction
reductionse5
Value
68.5%e5
Comparator
control groupe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“The 3.5 mM MeJA dose significantly reduced the abundance of sucking pests across both 2024 and 2025 compared to the control group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1100 · show in text ↑
e5

“In 2025, the suppressive effects were generally more pronounced, with reductions reaching 68.5% in apterous aphids and 62.3% in T. tabaci”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2025 the 3.5 mM MeJA dose reduced Thrips tabaci by 62.3%.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
3.5 mM MeJA dosee2
Interactor
T. tabaciThrips tabacie5pest
Outcome
T. tabacie5
Direction
reductionse5
Value
62.3%e5
Comparator
control groupe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Thrips tabaci
Thrips tabaci · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAlton N. Sparks, Jr., University of Georgia, Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“The 3.5 mM MeJA dose significantly reduced the abundance of sucking pests across both 2024 and 2025 compared to the control group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1100 · show in text ↑
e5

“In 2025, the suppressive effects were generally more pronounced, with reductions reaching 68.5% in apterous aphids and 62.3% in T. tabaci”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2025 the 3.5 mM MeJA dose significantly decreased alate aphids by 50.9%.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
3.5 mM MeJA dosee2
Interactor
alate aphidse6pest
Outcome
alate aphidse6
Direction
decreasese6
Value
50.9%e6
Comparator
control groupe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“The 3.5 mM MeJA dose significantly reduced the abundance of sucking pests across both 2024 and 2025 compared to the control group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1100 · show in text ↑
e6

“significant decreases in alate aphids 50.9% and E. decipiens (47.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1565 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2025 the 3.5 mM MeJA dose significantly decreased Empoasca decipiens by 47.8%.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
3.5 mM MeJA dosee2
Interactor
E. decipiensHebata decipiense6pest
Outcome
E. decipiense6
Direction
decreasese6
Value
47.8%e6
Comparator
control groupe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“The 3.5 mM MeJA dose significantly reduced the abundance of sucking pests across both 2024 and 2025 compared to the control group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 971–1100 · show in text ↑
e6

“significant decreases in alate aphids 50.9% and E. decipiens (47.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1497–1565 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chrysoperla carnea populations were not affected by MeJA concentration.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
MeJA concentratione1
Interactor
Chrysoperla carnea StephensChrysoperla carneae1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
populationse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Chrysoperla carnea
Chrysoperla carnea · InteractorDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“common bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chrysoperla carnea Stephens (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) populations were not affected by MeJA concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1931–2036 · show in text ↑

(-)-methyl jasmonate · pest · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.