Paper · 1994 · Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America; (United States)

Elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide: Effects on tritrophic interactions

Sherry Roth; Richard L. Lindroth

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

We examined how CO[sub 2]-mediated changes in tree chemistry affect performance of the gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar) and its suitability as a host for the parasitoid Cotesia melanoscelus. Four species of deciduous trees were grown under ambient or elevated CO[sub 2] conditions, and foliage was fed to gypsy moths in two separate bioassays. In the first, we measured performance (i.e., growth rates) of control and parasitized gypsy moth larvae for the duration of the third stadium. In the second, we assessed parasitoid performance in relation to quality of the host larvae. We found that parasitized gypsy moth larvae on all diets grew more slowly and suffered reduced food processing efficiencies relative to control larvae. The magnitude of growth suppression was greater under elevated CO[sub 2] conditions. Parasitoid performance varied in relation to host plant species but not in relation to CO[sub 2] environment. These results will be interpreted in relation to tree chemistry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parasitized gypsy moth larvae fed tree foliage on all diets grew more slowly than control larvae.

Taxon
gypsy mothLymantria dispare0
Treatment
parasitizede0
Interactor
Cotesia melanosceluse1parasite
Outcome
grew more slowlye0
Direction
more slowlye0
Comparator
control larvaee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lymantria dispar
Lymantria dispar · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“parasitized gypsy moth larvae on all diets grew more slowly and suffered reduced food processing efficiencies relative to control larvae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–727 · show in text ↑
e1

“the parasitoid Cotesia melanoscelus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parasitized gypsy moth larvae had reduced food processing efficiencies relative to control larvae.

Taxon
gypsy mothLymantria dispare0
Treatment
parasitizede0
Interactor
Cotesia melanosceluse1parasite
Outcome
food processing efficienciese0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
control larvaee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lymantria dispar
Lymantria dispar · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“parasitized gypsy moth larvae on all diets grew more slowly and suffered reduced food processing efficiencies relative to control larvae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–727 · show in text ↑
e1

“the parasitoid Cotesia melanoscelus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The magnitude of growth suppression of parasitized gypsy moth larvae was greater under elevated CO2 than under ambient CO2.

Taxon
gypsy mothLymantria dispare2
Treatment
elevated CO[sub 2]e0
Outcome
growth suppressione0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
ambiente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lymantria dispar
Lymantria dispar · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The magnitude of growth suppression was greater under elevated CO[sub 2] conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 729–812 · show in text ↑
e1

“grown under ambient or elevated CO[sub 2] conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–277 · show in text ↑
e2

“gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–116 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parasitoid (Cotesia melanoscelus) performance varied in relation to host plant species.

Taxon
Cotesia melanosceluse1
Treatment
host plant speciese0
Outcome
Parasitoid performancee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Parasitoid performance varied in relation to host plant species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–877 · show in text ↑
e1

“the parasitoid Cotesia melanoscelus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–186 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Parasitoid (Cotesia melanoscelus) performance did not vary in relation to CO2 environment (ambient versus elevated).

Taxon
Cotesia melanosceluse2
Treatment
CO[sub 2] environmente0
Outcome
Parasitoid performancee3
Direction
not in relatione0
Comparator
ambiente1

Verbatim

e0

“not in relation to CO[sub 2] environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–922 · show in text ↑
e1

“grown under ambient or elevated CO[sub 2] conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–277 · show in text ↑
e2

“the parasitoid Cotesia melanoscelus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–186 · show in text ↑
e3

“Parasitoid performance varied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–843 · show in text ↑