Paper · 2003 · OENO One

Study of sugar phloem unloading in ripening grape berries under water stress conditions

Zenphing Wang; Alain Deloire; Alain Carbonneau; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
26
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Sugar phloem unloading in ripening grape berries (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Syrah) was studied under water stress conditions using the «beny-cup» technique. After veraison, berry growth, the potential Exposed Leaf Area (pELA) and photosynthetic activity are clearly reduced in water-stressed vines (- 0.5 > Ψb > - 0.6 MPa) as compared to normal 1 Ψ-watcred vines (Mb = - 0.2 MPa). The ratio pELA/yield is also reduced, which is particular to this experiment. The beiries' ripening period (between veraison and maturity) can be divided into three growth phases, Illa, Illb and IIlc. During phase Ma, the berries grow rapidly; at this point, water stress severely inhibits cell expan¬ sion of the berries but does not impact on daily sugar accumulation. During phase Mb, the berries grow slowly in both water-stressed and control vines. Water stress can shorten this phase and reduce sugar accumulation in the berries by decreasing daily sugar unloading. During phase II le, the Iresh weight and volume of the berries decreases as does the daily sugar unloading. During the day, sugar unloading in ripening berries occurs mainly in the morning (7 am to 10.30 am) and at noon (1 to 1.30 pm); little sugar is unloaded in the afternoon (4 pm to 4.30 pin). Moderate water stress from veraison to maturity affects végétative growth (i.e. the growth of primary and secoridary shoots), and reduces the exposed leaf area, photosynthetic activity, berry growth, and the accumulation of sugar at the end of ripening (phases Mb and IIlc).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress reduced berry growth, exposed leaf area and photosynthesis after veraison.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
water-stressed vinese0
Outcome
berry growth, the potential Exposed Leaf Area (pELA) and photosynthetic activitye0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
normal 1 Ψ-watcred vinese0

Verbatim

e0

“After veraison, berry growth, the potential Exposed Leaf Area (pELA) and photosynthetic activity are clearly reduced in water-stressed vines (- 0.5 > Ψb > - 0.6 MPa) as compared to normal 1 Ψ-watcred vines (Mb = - 0.2 MPa).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–376 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress reduced the exposed leaf area to yield ratio.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
water stresst0
Outcome
ratio pELA/yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The ratio pELA/yield is also reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–413 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape berries under water stress conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress severely inhibited berry cell expansion during phase IIIa.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
cell expan¬ sion of the berriese0
Direction
inhibitse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“water stress severely inhibits cell expan¬ sion of the berries but does not impact on daily sugar accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–747 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress did not affect daily sugar accumulation during phase IIIa.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
daily sugar accumulatione0
Direction
does not impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“water stress severely inhibits cell expan¬ sion of the berries but does not impact on daily sugar accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–747 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress shortened the slow growth phase.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
Water stresse0
Outcome
this phasee0
Direction
shortene0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Water stress can shorten this phase and reduce sugar accumulation in the berries by decreasing daily sugar unloading.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–948 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress reduced berry sugar accumulation by decreasing daily unloading.

Taxon
grapet0
Treatment
Water stresse0
Outcome
sugar accumulation in the berriese0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Water stress can shorten this phase and reduce sugar accumulation in the berries by decreasing daily sugar unloading.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–948 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Berry fresh weight and volume decreased during late ripening.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
Iresh weight and volume of the berriese0
Direction
decreasese0

Verbatim

e0

“During phase II le, the Iresh weight and volume of the berries decreases as does the daily sugar unloading.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Daily sugar unloading decreased during late ripening.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
daily sugar unloadinge0
Direction
decreasese0

Verbatim

e0

“During phase II le, the Iresh weight and volume of the berries decreases as does the daily sugar unloading.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar unloading occurred mainly in the morning and at noon, with little in the afternoon.

Taxon
grapet0
Outcome
sugar unloading in ripening berriese0
Qualifier
mainly in the morning (7 am to 10.30 am) and at noon (1 to 1.30 pm); little sugar is unloaded in the afternoon (4 pm to 4.30 pin)e0

Verbatim

e0

“During the day, sugar unloading in ripening berries occurs mainly in the morning (7 am to 10.30 am) and at noon (1 to 1.30 pm); little sugar is unloaded in the afternoon (4 pm to 4.30 pin).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1246 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–49 · show in text ↑

drought · growth · VitisResults differ

32 papers: 6 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

drought · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results

21 papers: 14 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.