Paper · 1992 · Weed Science

Efficacy and Economics of Herbicides for Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense) Control in No-till Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

William W. Donald; Tony Prato

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The objective of this field research was to compare relative effectiveness and profitability of alternative herbicides applied to the same plots for four consecutive years for controlling and reducing dense Canada thistle infestations in no-till spring wheat. Chlorsulfuron at 30 g ai ha −1 plus nonionic surfactant or clopyralid plus 2,4-D at 70 plus 280 g ae ha −1 , respectively, applied annually for 4 yr controlled Canada thistle and was more effective for gradually reducing Canada thistle stands than 2,4-D at 560 g ae ha −1 , MCPA plus bromoxynil at 280 plus 280 g ae ha −1 , or tribenuron at 20 g ai ha −1 . Chlorsulfuron and clopyralid plus 2,4-D also controlled Canada thistle ≥ 90% earlier (by 2 yr) than other treatments. Stochastic dominance analysis, a form of economic analysis, predicted that either chlorsulfuron or clopyralid plus 2,4-D would be preferred by farmers to the untreated check, MCPA plus bromoxynil, or 2,4-D treatments. Chlorsulfuron also would be preferred to clopyralid plus 2,4-D by risk-neutral farmers, whereas clopyralid plus 2,4-D would be preferred to chlorsulfuron by highly risk-averse farmers, those who are most likely to pick only consistently effective herbicides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual chlorsulfuron controlled and reduced Canada thistle more effectively than three alternatives.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Chlorsulfuron at 30 g ai ha −1 plus nonionic surfactante0
Interactor
Canada thistleCirsium arvensee0weed
Outcome
Canada thistle standse0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
2,4-D at 560 g ae ha −1 , MCPA plus bromoxynil at 280 plus 280 g ae ha −1 , or tribenuron at 20 g ai ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cirsium arvense
Cirsium arvense · InteractorAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorsulfuron at 30 g ai ha −1 plus nonionic surfactant or clopyralid plus 2,4-D at 70 plus 280 g ae ha −1 , respectively, applied annually for 4 yr controlled Canada thistle and was more effective for gradually reducing Canada thistle stands than 2,4-D at 560 g ae ha −1 , MCPA plus bromoxynil at 280 plus 280 g ae ha −1 , or tribenuron at 20 g ai ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–614 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 93–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Annual clopyralid plus 2,4-D controlled and reduced Canada thistle more effectively than three alternatives.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
clopyralid plus 2,4-D at 70 plus 280 g ae ha −1e0
Interactor
Canada thistleCirsium arvensee0weed
Outcome
Canada thistle standse0
Direction
reducinge0
Comparator
2,4-D at 560 g ae ha −1 , MCPA plus bromoxynil at 280 plus 280 g ae ha −1 , or tribenuron at 20 g ai ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cirsium arvense
Cirsium arvense · InteractorAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorsulfuron at 30 g ai ha −1 plus nonionic surfactant or clopyralid plus 2,4-D at 70 plus 280 g ae ha −1 , respectively, applied annually for 4 yr controlled Canada thistle and was more effective for gradually reducing Canada thistle stands than 2,4-D at 560 g ae ha −1 , MCPA plus bromoxynil at 280 plus 280 g ae ha −1 , or tribenuron at 20 g ai ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 260–614 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 93–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorsulfuron achieved at least 90% thistle control two years earlier than other treatments.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Chlorsulfurone0
Interactor
Canada thistleCirsium arvensee0weed
Outcome
Canada thistlee0
Direction
earliere0
Value
≥ 90%e0
Qualifier
by 2 yre0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cirsium arvense
Cirsium arvense · InteractorAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorsulfuron and clopyralid plus 2,4-D also controlled Canada thistle ≥ 90% earlier (by 2 yr) than other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–733 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 93–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clopyralid plus 2,4-D achieved at least 90% thistle control two years earlier than other treatments.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
clopyralid plus 2,4-De0
Interactor
Canada thistleCirsium arvensee0weed
Outcome
Canada thistlee0
Direction
earliere0
Value
≥ 90%e0
Qualifier
by 2 yre0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cirsium arvense
Cirsium arvense · InteractorAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorsulfuron and clopyralid plus 2,4-D also controlled Canada thistle ≥ 90% earlier (by 2 yr) than other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–733 · show in text ↑
t0

“spring wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 93–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Economic analysis predicted farmers would prefer chlorsulfuron over untreated, MCPA plus bromoxynil, or 2,4-D treatments.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
chlorsulfurone0
Interactor
Canada ThistleCirsium arvenset0weed
Outcome
preferred by farmerse0
Direction
preferrede0
Comparator
untreated check, MCPA plus bromoxynil, or 2,4-D treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cirsium arvense
Cirsium arvense · InteractorAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“predicted that either chlorsulfuron or clopyralid plus 2,4-D would be preferred by farmers to the untreated check, MCPA plus bromoxynil, or 2,4-D treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense) Control in No-till Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Economic analysis predicted farmers would prefer clopyralid plus 2,4-D over untreated, MCPA plus bromoxynil, or 2,4-D treatments.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
clopyralid plus 2,4-De0
Interactor
Canada ThistleCirsium arvenset0weed
Outcome
preferred by farmerse0
Direction
preferrede0
Comparator
untreated check, MCPA plus bromoxynil, or 2,4-D treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cirsium arvense
Cirsium arvense · InteractorAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“predicted that either chlorsulfuron or clopyralid plus 2,4-D would be preferred by farmers to the untreated check, MCPA plus bromoxynil, or 2,4-D treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense) Control in No-till Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Risk-neutral farmers would prefer chlorsulfuron to clopyralid plus 2,4-D.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Chlorsulfurone0
Interactor
Canada ThistleCirsium arvenset0weed
Outcome
preferrede0
Direction
preferrede0
Qualifier
risk-neutral farmerse0
Comparator
clopyralid plus 2,4-De0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cirsium arvense
Cirsium arvense · InteractorAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorsulfuron also would be preferred to clopyralid plus 2,4-D by risk-neutral farmers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1039 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense) Control in No-till Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Highly risk-averse farmers would prefer clopyralid plus 2,4-D to chlorsulfuron.

Taxon
Spring WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
clopyralid plus 2,4-De0
Interactor
Canada ThistleCirsium arvenset0weed
Outcome
preferrede0
Direction
preferrede0
Qualifier
highly risk-averse farmerse0
Comparator
chlorsulfurone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cirsium arvense
Cirsium arvense · InteractorAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“clopyralid plus 2,4-D would be preferred to chlorsulfuron by highly risk-averse farmers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense) Control in No-till Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–125 · show in text ↑

nonionic surfactant · Cirsium arvense · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

2,4-D · Cirsium arvense · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

clopyralid · Cirsium arvense · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

chlorsulfuron · Cirsium arvense · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.