Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during the rainy season of 1993-94 to 1995-96 at Jhansi, to study the different food-fodder cropping systems and manurial schedules under rainfed conditions. Significantly higher grain and stover yields of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] were obtained in sorghum + pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] intercropping system as compared with other intercropping systems. Sorghum + cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] intercropping gave significantly more green fodder and dry-matter yields and sorghum grain-equivalent yield than the other intercropping systems. Among the different manurial schedules, combined application of organic and inorganic sources of plant nutrients resulted in significantly higher grain and stover yields of sorghum, green fodder and dry-matter yields of fodder crops and sorghum grain-equivalent yield as compared to 100% through inorganic fertilizers application.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Sorghum grain yield was significantly higher with pigeonpea intercropping than with other intercropping systems.
- Treatment
- sorghum + pigeonpeae0
- Outcome
- graine0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- other intercropping systemse0
SorghumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significantly higher grain and stover yields of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] were obtained in sorghum + pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] intercropping system as compared with other intercropping systems.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sorghum stover yield was significantly higher with pigeonpea intercropping than with other intercropping systems.
- Treatment
- sorghum + pigeonpeae0
- Outcome
- stovere0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- other intercropping systemse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significantly higher grain and stover yields of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] were obtained in sorghum + pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] intercropping system as compared with other intercropping systems.”
Claim · model-written summary
Cowpea intercropping gave significantly more green fodder yield than other systems.
- Treatment
- Sorghum + cowpeae0
- Outcome
- green foddere0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- other intercropping systemse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sorghum + cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] intercropping gave significantly more green fodder and dry-matter yields and sorghum grain-equivalent yield than the other intercropping systems.”
Claim · model-written summary
Cowpea intercropping gave significantly more dry-matter yield than other systems.
- Treatment
- Sorghum + cowpeae0
- Outcome
- dry-mattere0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- other intercropping systemse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sorghum + cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] intercropping gave significantly more green fodder and dry-matter yields and sorghum grain-equivalent yield than the other intercropping systems.”
Claim · model-written summary
Cowpea intercropping gave significantly more sorghum grain-equivalent yield than other systems.
- Treatment
- Sorghum + cowpeae0
- Outcome
- sorghum grain-equivalente0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- other intercropping systemse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sorghum + cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] intercropping gave significantly more green fodder and dry-matter yields and sorghum grain-equivalent yield than the other intercropping systems.”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined organic and inorganic nutrients gave significantly higher grain yield than inorganic fertilizer alone.
- Treatment
- combined application of organic and inorganic sources of plant nutrientse0
- Outcome
- graine0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- 100% through inorganic fertilizers applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among the different manurial schedules, combined application of organic and inorganic sources of plant nutrients resulted in significantly higher grain and stover yields of sorghum, green fodder and dry-matter yields of fodder crops and sorghum grain-equivalent yield as compared to 100% through inorganic fertilizers application.”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined organic and inorganic nutrients gave significantly higher stover yield than inorganic fertilizer alone.
- Treatment
- combined application of organic and inorganic sources of plant nutrientse0
- Outcome
- stovere0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- 100% through inorganic fertilizers applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among the different manurial schedules, combined application of organic and inorganic sources of plant nutrients resulted in significantly higher grain and stover yields of sorghum, green fodder and dry-matter yields of fodder crops and sorghum grain-equivalent yield as compared to 100% through inorganic fertilizers application.”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined organic and inorganic nutrients gave significantly higher green fodder yield than inorganic fertilizer alone.
Verbatim
e0“Among the different manurial schedules, combined application of organic and inorganic sources of plant nutrients resulted in significantly higher grain and stover yields of sorghum, green fodder and dry-matter yields of fodder crops and sorghum grain-equivalent yield as compared to 100% through inorganic fertilizers application.”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined organic and inorganic nutrients gave significantly higher dry-matter yield than inorganic fertilizer alone.
Verbatim
e0“Among the different manurial schedules, combined application of organic and inorganic sources of plant nutrients resulted in significantly higher grain and stover yields of sorghum, green fodder and dry-matter yields of fodder crops and sorghum grain-equivalent yield as compared to 100% through inorganic fertilizers application.”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined organic and inorganic nutrients gave significantly higher sorghum grain-equivalent yield than inorganic fertilizer alone.
- Treatment
- combined application of organic and inorganic sources of plant nutrientse0
- Outcome
- sorghum grain-equivalente0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- 100% through inorganic fertilizers applicatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Among the different manurial schedules, combined application of organic and inorganic sources of plant nutrients resulted in significantly higher grain and stover yields of sorghum, green fodder and dry-matter yields of fodder crops and sorghum grain-equivalent yield as compared to 100% through inorganic fertilizers application.”
The same questions in other papers
Vigna unguiculata · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Cajanus cajan · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →Vigna unguiculata · organism · SorghumResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.