Paper · 2003 · 中国农业科学:英文版

Effect of Different Norms of Under—Mulch—Drip Irrigation on Diurnal Changes of Photosynthesis and Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameter in High Yield Cotton of Xinjiang

LIShao-kun; GOULing; YUSong-lie; et al.

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Under-mulch-drip irrigation is an advanced irrigation technique, which combines plastic-film-covered cultivation with drip irrigation. The influence of different norms of under-mulch-drip irrigation on di-urnal changes of photosynthetic rates and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of cotton was studied, in orderto understand the physiological mechanisms of water-saving and high-yielding farming in Xinjiang. Results in-dicated that limited drip irrigation, which supplies 2/3 of 375 m3 ha-1 , the widely-used irrigation norm in cot-ton cultivation in Xinjiang, caused a water deficit in cotton field. Compared with the proper drip irrigation,the leaf photosynthetic rate under limited drip irrigation decreased during 9:00 to 11:00 a. m., and was sig-nificantly suppressed at midday, and then recovered afterwards. Using the chlorophyll fluorescence method,the absorption, transfer and transformation features of solar radiation by cotton leaf were investigated. Underlimited drip irrigation, the variable fluorescence (Fy) and primary light transfer efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm)in cotton leaves were reduced because of the high light intensities and high temperatures at noon, and the de-crease in Xinluzao8 was greater than that in Xinluzao6. Therefore, it could be concluded that Xinluzao6 has ahigher drought-tolerance, and the Fv/Fm ratio could be used as a drought-resistance index for cotton.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Limited drip irrigation caused a water deficit in the cotton field.

Treatment
limited drip irrigatione0
Outcome
water deficit in cotton fielde0
Comparator
375 m3 ha-1e0
Setting
Xinjiange0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“limited drip irrigation, which supplies 2/3 of 375 m3 ha-1 , the widely-used irrigation norm in cot-ton cultivation in Xinjiang, caused a water deficit in cotton field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Limited irrigation reduced leaf photosynthesis during 9:00 to 11:00 a. m. and suppressed it at midday, with later recovery.

Treatment
limited drip irrigatione0
Outcome
leaf photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
9:00 to 11:00 a. m.e0
Comparator
proper drip irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the proper drip irrigation,the leaf photosynthetic rate under limited drip irrigation decreased during 9:00 to 11:00 a. m., and was sig-nificantly suppressed at midday, and then recovered afterwards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–817 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–153 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Limited irrigation reduced cotton leaf variable fluorescence and PSII primary light transfer efficiency at noon.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
limited drip irrigatione0
Outcome
variable fluorescence (Fy) and primary light transfer efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm)e0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
high light intensities and high temperatures at noone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under limited drip irrigation, the variable fluorescence (Fy) and primary light transfer efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm)in cotton leaves were reduced because of the high light intensities and high temperatures at noon”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 967–1178 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fluorescence decrease was greater in Xinluzao8 than Xinluzao6.

Material
Xinluzao8e0
Outcome
de-creasee0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
Xinluzao6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the de-crease in Xinluzao8 was greater than that in Xinluzao6”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1245 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–153 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Xinluzao6 was concluded to have higher drought tolerance.

Material
Xinluzao6e0
Outcome
drought-tolerancee0
Direction
ahighere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Xinluzao6 has ahigher drought-tolerance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1324 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 147–153 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Fv/Fm ratio could serve as a cotton drought-resistance index.

Gene
Fv/Fme0
Outcome
drought-resistance indexe0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Fv/Fm ratio could be used as a drought-resistance index for cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1330–1400 · show in text ↑

irrigation · organism · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 15 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 9 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.