Paper · 2002

Use of biocides to determine the impact of detrimental fungi and nematodes on establishment and early growth of sugarcane following rotation breaks.

C. E. Pankhurst; B. L. Blair; R. C. Magarey; et al.

10
claims
23
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Three different biocide treatments: fumigation, fungicide and nematicide were used to determine what proportion of the early growth response following three different rotation breaks (pasture, crop and bare fallow) was associated with a reduction in populations of detrimental fungi and nematodes in the soil. Cane plants were examined 54 days after planting into soil that had been under the different breaks for 54 months. Each of the breaks had a positive effect on % bud germination and sett root growth, parameters associated with plant establishment. The biocide treatments suggested that detrimental fungi in continual sugarcane (plough-out/re-plant or PO/RP), and following the pasture break, but not following the crop or bare fallow breaks, affected bud germination. Fumigation, fungicide and fungicide + nematicide, increased plant growth parameters associated with early growth (shoot root growth, primary shoot growth, number of secondary shoots) across all three breaks and PO/RP. These responses were attributed to the control of detrimental fungi and nematodes and to possible biocide effects on the nutrient status of the soil. Sett root growth was positively correlated with plant parameters associated with early plant growth and negatively correlated with populations of rhizosphere fungi. The results confirm that a major effect of the rotation breaks is to reduce the impact of detrimental fungi and nematodes, which affect the establishment of the cane crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pasture breaks improved cane bud germination and sett root growth.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
pasturee1
Outcome
% bud germination and sett root growthe0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Each of the breaks had a positive effect on % bud germination and sett root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–507 · show in text ↑
e1

“rotation breaks (pasture, crop and bare fallow)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop breaks improved cane bud germination and sett root growth.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
crope1
Outcome
% bud germination and sett root growthe0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Each of the breaks had a positive effect on % bud germination and sett root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–507 · show in text ↑
e1

“rotation breaks (pasture, crop and bare fallow)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–214 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bare fallow breaks improved cane bud germination and sett root growth.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
bare fallowe1
Outcome
% bud germination and sett root growthe0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Each of the breaks had a positive effect on % bud germination and sett root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–507 · show in text ↑
e1

“rotation breaks (pasture, crop and bare fallow)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–214 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biocide results implicated detrimental fungi in bud germination under continual sugarcane and after pasture, but not crop or bare fallow breaks.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
biocide treatmentse0
Interactor
detrimental fungie0pathogen
Outcome
bud germinatione0
Qualifier
following the pasture break, but not following the crop or bare fallow breakse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“The biocide treatments suggested that detrimental fungi in continual sugarcane (plough-out/re-plant or PO/RP), and following the pasture break, but not following the crop or bare fallow breaks, affected bud germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–775 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fumigation increased early cane growth parameters across all breaks and continual cropping.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
Fumigatione0
Outcome
shoot root growth, primary shoot growth, number of secondary shootse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fumigation, fungicide and fungicide + nematicide, increased plant growth parameters associated with early growth (shoot root growth, primary shoot growth, number of secondary shoots) across all three breaks and PO/RP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–993 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide increased early cane growth parameters across all breaks and continual cropping.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
fungicidee0
Outcome
shoot root growth, primary shoot growth, number of secondary shootse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fumigation, fungicide and fungicide + nematicide, increased plant growth parameters associated with early growth (shoot root growth, primary shoot growth, number of secondary shoots) across all three breaks and PO/RP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–993 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide plus nematicide increased early cane growth parameters across all breaks and continual cropping.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
fungicide + nematicidee0
Outcome
shoot root growth, primary shoot growth, number of secondary shootse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fumigation, fungicide and fungicide + nematicide, increased plant growth parameters associated with early growth (shoot root growth, primary shoot growth, number of secondary shoots) across all three breaks and PO/RP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–993 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sett root growth correlated positively with early cane growth parameters.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
Sett roote0
Outcome
plant parameters associated with early plant growthe0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sett root growth was positively correlated with plant parameters associated with early plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1244 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sett root growth correlated negatively with rhizosphere fungal populations.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Organ / stage
Sett roote0
Interactor
rhizosphere fungie0other
Outcome
populations of rhizosphere fungie0
Direction
negatively correlatede0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sett root growth was positively correlated with plant parameters associated with early plant growth and negatively correlated with populations of rhizosphere fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1308 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that breaks chiefly reduce the impact of detrimental fungi and nematodes on cane establishment.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
rotation breakse0
Interactor
detrimental fungie0pathogen
Second interactor
nematodesNematodae0pathogen
Outcome
establishment of the cane crope0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“a major effect of the rotation breaks is to reduce the impact of detrimental fungi and nematodes, which affect the establishment of the cane crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1480 · show in text ↑

insecticide · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fungicide · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

solarization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

rotation · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.