Paper · 2007 · Journal of Horticultural Sciences

Studies on Parental Synchronization in Flowering for Hybrid Seed Production in Onion (Allium cepa L.)

K Padmini; R Veere Gowda; L B Naik

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

An experiment was conducted at the Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Bangalore, in Rabi season during 2001-2002 and 2002-2003 to study the flowering of Cytoplasmic Male Sterile Lines CMS (A) and pollinator lines (C) of onion cv. Arka Lalima for working out effective synchrony in hybrid seed production. Results indicated that days to 100% flowering and days to complete flowering in a plant varied significantly in the parental lines and C line was found to be earlier than A line by 12 days and 25 days, respectively. The duration of flowering in a plant was also less in C line (23 days) than in A line (29 days). Due to lack of floral synchrony between parental lines, pollen availability becomes a limiting factor in hybrid seed production in cv. Arka Lalima. Delay in planting of C lines by a week after planting A lines resulted in synchronised flowering of parental lines at peak flowering stage. This also resulted in higher fruit set (80%) and hybrid seed yield (15g/plant) as against planting of A and C lines simultaneously (29.54% and 0.38g, respectively).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

C line reached 100% flowering 12 days earlier than A line.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Material
C linee0
Outcome
days to 100% floweringe0
Direction
earliere0
Value
12 dayse0
Comparator
A linee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“days to 100% flowering and days to complete flowering in a plant varied significantly in the parental lines and C line was found to be earlier than A line by 12 days and 25 days, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–528 · show in text ↑
e1

“onion cv. Arka Lalima”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–250 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

C line completed flowering 25 days earlier than A line.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Material
C linee0
Outcome
days to complete floweringe0
Direction
earliere0
Value
25 dayse0
Comparator
A linee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“days to 100% flowering and days to complete flowering in a plant varied significantly in the parental lines and C line was found to be earlier than A line by 12 days and 25 days, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–528 · show in text ↑
e1

“onion cv. Arka Lalima”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–250 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowering duration was shorter in C line at 23 days than A line at 29 days.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Material
C linee0
Outcome
duration of floweringe0
Direction
lesse0
Value
23 dayse0
Qualifier
29 dayse0
Comparator
A linee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The duration of flowering in a plant was also less in C line (23 days) than in A line (29 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–625 · show in text ↑
e1

“onion cv. Arka Lalima”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–250 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lack of synchrony made pollen availability limiting for hybrid seed production.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Material
Arka Lalimae0
Outcome
pollen availability becomes a limiting factore0
Qualifier
lack of floral synchrony between parental linese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Due to lack of floral synchrony between parental lines, pollen availability becomes a limiting factor in hybrid seed production in cv. Arka Lalima”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–773 · show in text ↑
e1

“onion cv. Arka Lalima”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–250 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting C lines one week after A lines synchronized peak flowering.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
Delay in planting of C lines by a week after planting A linese0
Outcome
synchronised flowering of parental linese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Delay in planting of C lines by a week after planting A lines resulted in synchronised flowering of parental lines at peak flowering stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–913 · show in text ↑
e1

“onion cv. Arka Lalima”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–250 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed C line planting raised fruit set to 80% versus 29.54% with simultaneous planting.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae2
Treatment
Delay in planting of C lines by a week after planting A linese1
Outcome
fruit sete0
Direction
highere0
Value
80%e0
Qualifier
29.54%e0
Comparator
planting of A and C lines simultaneouslye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This also resulted in higher fruit set (80%) and hybrid seed yield (15g/plant) as against planting of A and C lines simultaneously (29.54% and 0.38g, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1078 · show in text ↑
e1

“Delay in planting of C lines by a week after planting A lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–836 · show in text ↑
e2

“onion cv. Arka Lalima”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–250 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed C line planting raised hybrid seed yield to 15g/plant versus 0.38g with simultaneous planting.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae2
Treatment
Delay in planting of C lines by a week after planting A linese1
Outcome
hybrid seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
15g/plante0
Qualifier
0.38ge0
Comparator
planting of A and C lines simultaneouslye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This also resulted in higher fruit set (80%) and hybrid seed yield (15g/plant) as against planting of A and C lines simultaneously (29.54% and 0.38g, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1078 · show in text ↑
e1

“Delay in planting of C lines by a week after planting A lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–836 · show in text ↑
e2

“onion cv. Arka Lalima”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–250 · show in text ↑

sowing time · phenology · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 4 positive, 5 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.