Paper · 2014 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Distribution and plant availability of soil copper fractions to oat (Avena sativa) nutrition in Haryana soils

NARENDER NARENDER; R S MALIK; R P NARWAL; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The distribution of copper (Cu) among various chemical forms and its availability to oat nutrition may vary significantly in response to changing soil properties. Therefore, a pot and laboratory study were conducted to investigate the distribution of native and added Cu fractions and their plant availability to oat (Avena sativa L.) nutrition in eighteen (18) different soils of Haryana that varied in physical and chemical properties. Seven-step sequential fractionation showed that most of the total Cu (51.12%) was associated in the residual fraction (RES). The percentage of soil Cu in the exchangeable fraction (EX-), carbonate bound (CARB-), organically associated (OM-), Mn oxide bound (MnOX-), amorphous Fe oxide bound (AFeOX-) and crystalline Fe oxide bound (CFeOX-) fractions averaged 2.71, 0.74, 2.74, 0.21, 13.35, and 29.11%, respectively. Amount of Cu in MnOX, AFeOX, CFeOX, RES-fractions and total Cu were interdependent and varied directly with DTPA-extractable Cu and clay content. On the basis of stepwise regression analysis, the residual fraction contribute very little whereas exchangeable and carbonate bound fraction contribute maximum to the availability of Cu to oat plant. The concentration of Cu and its uptake in oat were positively correlated with DTPA-extractable Cu, MnOX-Cu, AFeOX-Cu and total Cu, which in turn were correlated with clay content. Plant Cu concentration and uptake can be predicted by an equation which includes DTPA-extractable Cu and clay content. These results showed that DTPA-extractable Cu is a good predictor of Cu availability in Haryana soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most of the total soil Cu, 51.12%, was in the residual fraction.

Outcome
total Cue1
Value
51.12%e1
Qualifier
associated in the residual fraction (RES)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“oat (Avena sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–82 · show in text ↑
e1

“Seven-step sequential fractionation showed that most of the total Cu (51.12%) was associated in the residual fraction (RES)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 438–561 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exchangeable fraction (EX-) of soil Cu averaged 2.71%.

Outcome
exchangeable fraction (EX-)e2
Value
2.71e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“oat (Avena sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–82 · show in text ↑
e2

“The percentage of soil Cu in the exchangeable fraction (EX-), carbonate bound (CARB-), organically associated (OM-), Mn oxide bound (MnOX-), amorphous Fe oxide bound (AFeOX-) and crystalline Fe oxide bound (CFeOX-) fractions averaged 2.71, 0.74, 2.74, 0.21, 13.35, and 29.11%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–852 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbonate bound (CARB-) fraction of soil Cu averaged 0.74%.

Outcome
carbonate bound (CARB-)e2
Value
0.74e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“oat (Avena sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–82 · show in text ↑
e2

“The percentage of soil Cu in the exchangeable fraction (EX-), carbonate bound (CARB-), organically associated (OM-), Mn oxide bound (MnOX-), amorphous Fe oxide bound (AFeOX-) and crystalline Fe oxide bound (CFeOX-) fractions averaged 2.71, 0.74, 2.74, 0.21, 13.35, and 29.11%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–852 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organically associated (OM-) fraction of soil Cu averaged 2.74%.

Outcome
organically associated (OM-)e2
Value
2.74e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“oat (Avena sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–82 · show in text ↑
e2

“The percentage of soil Cu in the exchangeable fraction (EX-), carbonate bound (CARB-), organically associated (OM-), Mn oxide bound (MnOX-), amorphous Fe oxide bound (AFeOX-) and crystalline Fe oxide bound (CFeOX-) fractions averaged 2.71, 0.74, 2.74, 0.21, 13.35, and 29.11%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–852 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mn oxide bound (MnOX-) fraction of soil Cu averaged 0.21%.

Outcome
Mn oxide bound (MnOX-)e2
Value
0.21e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“oat (Avena sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–82 · show in text ↑
e2

“The percentage of soil Cu in the exchangeable fraction (EX-), carbonate bound (CARB-), organically associated (OM-), Mn oxide bound (MnOX-), amorphous Fe oxide bound (AFeOX-) and crystalline Fe oxide bound (CFeOX-) fractions averaged 2.71, 0.74, 2.74, 0.21, 13.35, and 29.11%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–852 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amorphous Fe oxide bound (AFeOX-) fraction of soil Cu averaged 13.35%.

Outcome
amorphous Fe oxide bound (AFeOX-)e2
Value
13.35e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“oat (Avena sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–82 · show in text ↑
e2

“The percentage of soil Cu in the exchangeable fraction (EX-), carbonate bound (CARB-), organically associated (OM-), Mn oxide bound (MnOX-), amorphous Fe oxide bound (AFeOX-) and crystalline Fe oxide bound (CFeOX-) fractions averaged 2.71, 0.74, 2.74, 0.21, 13.35, and 29.11%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–852 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crystalline Fe oxide bound (CFeOX-) fraction of soil Cu averaged 29.11%.

Outcome
crystalline Fe oxide bound (CFeOX-)e2
Value
29.11%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“oat (Avena sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–82 · show in text ↑
e2

“The percentage of soil Cu in the exchangeable fraction (EX-), carbonate bound (CARB-), organically associated (OM-), Mn oxide bound (MnOX-), amorphous Fe oxide bound (AFeOX-) and crystalline Fe oxide bound (CFeOX-) fractions averaged 2.71, 0.74, 2.74, 0.21, 13.35, and 29.11%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–852 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exchangeable and carbonate bound Cu fractions contribute most to Cu availability to oat.

Compound
exchangeable and carbonate bound fractione3
Outcome
availability of Cu to oat plante3
Direction
contribute maximume3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“oat (Avena sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–82 · show in text ↑
e3

“On the basis of stepwise regression analysis, the residual fraction contribute very little whereas exchangeable and carbonate bound fraction contribute maximum to the availability of Cu to oat plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1198 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The residual Cu fraction contributes very little to Cu availability to oat.

Compound
residual fractione3
Outcome
availability of Cu to oat plante3
Direction
contribute very littlee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“oat (Avena sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–82 · show in text ↑
e3

“On the basis of stepwise regression analysis, the residual fraction contribute very little whereas exchangeable and carbonate bound fraction contribute maximum to the availability of Cu to oat plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1198 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu concentration and uptake in oat were positively correlated with DTPA-extractable Cu, MnOX-Cu and AFeOX-Cu.

Compound
DTPA-extractable Cu, MnOX-Cu, AFeOX-Cue4
Outcome
concentration of Cu and its uptake in oate4
Direction
positively correlatede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“oat (Avena sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–82 · show in text ↑
e4

“The concentration of Cu and its uptake in oat were positively correlated with DTPA-extractable Cu, MnOX-Cu, AFeOX-Cu and total Cu, which in turn were correlated with clay content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1378 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu concentration and uptake in oat were positively correlated with total Cu.

Compound
total Cue4
Outcome
concentration of Cu and its uptake in oate4
Direction
positively correlatede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“oat (Avena sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–82 · show in text ↑
e4

“The concentration of Cu and its uptake in oat were positively correlated with DTPA-extractable Cu, MnOX-Cu, AFeOX-Cu and total Cu, which in turn were correlated with clay content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1378 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cu fractions in MnOX, AFeOX, CFeOX, RES and total Cu varied directly with DTPA-extractable Cu and clay content.

Compound
DTPA-extractable Cue5
Outcome
Amount of Cu in MnOX, AFeOX, CFeOX, RES-fractions and total Cue5
Direction
varied directlye5
Comparator
clay contente5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“oat (Avena sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–82 · show in text ↑
e5

“Amount of Cu in MnOX, AFeOX, CFeOX, RES-fractions and total Cu were interdependent and varied directly with DTPA-extractable Cu and clay content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–998 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant Cu concentration and uptake can be predicted by an equation including DTPA-extractable Cu and clay content.

Outcome
Plant Cu concentration and uptakee6
Qualifier
an equation which includes DTPA-extractable Cu and clay contente6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“oat (Avena sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–82 · show in text ↑
e6

“Plant Cu concentration and uptake can be predicted by an equation which includes DTPA-extractable Cu and clay content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1497 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DTPA-extractable Cu is a good predictor of Cu availability in Haryana soils.

Compound
DTPA-extractable Cue7
Outcome
Cu availability in Haryana soilse7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“oat (Avena sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–82 · show in text ↑
e7

“DTPA-extractable Cu is a good predictor of Cu availability in Haryana soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1600 · show in text ↑