Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during the kharif season of 2009 at Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur, Rajasthan to find out the effect of tillage and integrated nutrient management on sorghum productivity grown with three tillage practices (Conventional tillage, reduced tillage and minimum tillage) assigned in main plot and four 1 NM practices RDF (80 kg N+40 kg P2O5+40 kg K2O/ha) through inorganic fertilizer, 75% RDF through inorganic fertilizer+5 t FYM/ha, 50% RDF through inorganic fertilizer+2.5 t FYM/ha+Azotobacter+PSB and control (Native fertility). Sorghum crop under conventional tillage recorded significantly higher grain, fodder and protein yield and NPK uptake over minimum tillage. Among the INM treatments, RDF recorded significantly higher grain, fodder, protein yield and NPK uptake over rest of the treatments. Conventional tillage and application of 75% RDF+5 t FYM/ha provided maximum moisture content in both the depths i. e. 0-15 and 15-30 cm at all the stages of crop growth.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage increased grain, fodder and protein yield over minimum tillage.
- Treatment
- conventional tillagee0
- Outcome
- grain, fodder and protein yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- minimum tillagee0
SorghumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sorghum crop under conventional tillage recorded significantly higher grain, fodder and protein yield and NPK uptake over minimum tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage increased NPK uptake over minimum tillage.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sorghum crop under conventional tillage recorded significantly higher grain, fodder and protein yield and NPK uptake over minimum tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF increased grain, fodder and protein yield over other nutrient treatments.
- Treatment
- RDFe0
- Outcome
- grain, fodder, protein yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- rest of the treatmentse0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“RDF recorded significantly higher grain, fodder, protein yield and NPK uptake over rest of the treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
RDF increased NPK uptake over other treatments.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“RDF recorded significantly higher grain, fodder, protein yield and NPK uptake over rest of the treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage gave maximum moisture at both measured depths.
- Treatment
- Conventional tillagee0
- Outcome
- moisture contente0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Qualifier
- 0-15 and 15-30 cme0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“Conventional tillage and application of 75% RDF+5 t FYM/ha provided maximum moisture content in both the depths i. e. 0-15 and 15-30 cm at all the stages of crop growth”
Claim · model-written summary
The 75% RDF plus FYM treatment gave maximum moisture at both measured depths.
- Treatment
- 75% RDF+5 t FYM/hae0
- Outcome
- moisture contente0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Qualifier
- 0-15 and 15-30 cme0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“Conventional tillage and application of 75% RDF+5 t FYM/ha provided maximum moisture content in both the depths i. e. 0-15 and 15-30 cm at all the stages of crop growth”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · quality: protein · SorghumPositive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
tillage · quality: grain · SorghumPositive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →tillage · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →fertilization · quality: grain · SorghumPositive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →fertilization · quality: protein · SorghumPositive and negative results
46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
49 papers more in this group
See all 53 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results
110 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
114 papers more in this group
See all 118 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.