Paper · 1984 · Lincoln (University of Nebraska)

Seeding Techniques for Alfalfa to Improve Subirrigated Meadows

S. S. Waller; R. N. Gates; Tally Hart; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Improving quality and quantity of forage harvested from poor condition, subirrigated hay meadows in the Nebraska Sand Hills is critical to the winter forage reserve of livestock producers. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) is the most commonly used legume for meadow improvement. Broadcast seeding (11.2 kg/ha) was compared to sod seeding (11.2 kg/ha) as a method to introduce alfalfa into an alkaline subirrigated meadow (Fluvaquentic Haplustolls). Before seeding, the study area received 78.5 kg/ha phosphorous. Paraquat (0.29 kg/ha) was applied to one-half of the area to suppress plant competition and provide qualitative information on treatment consistency across a range of sod competition. Lo-till sod seeding was accomplished with a power tillage seeder. Seedling density was determined in spring the following year. Broadcast alfalfa had a greater seedling density than sod-seeded alfalfa (38.4 and 19.1 plants/m2, respectively, p=.09). Apparently, paraquat had no effect on seedling establishment and tended to reduce total yield. Yields the year of seeding, using a two harvest scheme, were greater for broadcast compared to sod-seeded alfalfa (p=.02). However, there was no significant difference between yields of broadcast alfalfa and control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast alfalfa had a greater seedling density than sod-seeded alfalfa.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
Broadcast alfalfae1
Outcome
seedling densitye1
Direction
greatere1
Value
38.4 and 19.1 plants/m2e1
Qualifier
p=.09e1
Comparator
sod-seeded alfalfae1
Setting
Nebraska Sand Hillse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–30 · show in text ↑
e0

“subirrigated hay meadows in the Nebraska Sand Hills”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“Broadcast alfalfa had a greater seedling density than sod-seeded alfalfa (38.4 and 19.1 plants/m2, respectively, p=.09)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–940 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraquat had no effect on alfalfa seedling establishment.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
paraquate2
Outcome
seedling establishmente2
Direction
no effecte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–30 · show in text ↑
e2

“Apparently, paraquat had no effect on seedling establishment and tended to reduce total yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1035 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paraquat tended to reduce total alfalfa yield.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
paraquate2
Outcome
total yielde2
Direction
tended to reducee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–30 · show in text ↑
e2

“Apparently, paraquat had no effect on seedling establishment and tended to reduce total yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1035 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast alfalfa gave greater yields than sod-seeded alfalfa in the year of seeding.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
broadcaste3
Outcome
Yieldse3
Direction
greatere3
Qualifier
p=.02e3
Comparator
sod-seeded alfalfae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–30 · show in text ↑
e3

“Yields the year of seeding, using a two harvest scheme, were greater for broadcast compared to sod-seeded alfalfa (p=.02)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1158 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast alfalfa yields did not differ significantly from the control.

Taxon
AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
Treatment
broadcast alfalfae4
Outcome
yieldse4
Direction
no significant differencee4
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–30 · show in text ↑
e4

“However, there was no significant difference between yields of broadcast alfalfa and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1252 · show in text ↑

paraquat · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

11 papers: 4 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

paraquat · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

transplanting · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 11 positive, 4 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.