Abstract
Results of experiments conducted on Langra mango trees during the seasons of 1988/1989 and 1989/1990 revealed that Shading caused considerable reduction in vegetative growth, flowering percentage, final fruit retention, and delayed ripehing date from 7-10 days. However, it increased fruit T.T.S. Shading also decreased mature fruit number perpanicle and acidity of fruit juice. Also shading increased the percentage of leaf water content accompanied with a remarkable decrease in the osmotic pressure of the leaf sap, during the period of flower bud formation. Total indoles increased by shading. However, total phenols and phenols/Indoles ratio decreased in the terminal buds during the same period.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Shading considerably reduced vegetative growth and flowering percentage of Langra mango trees.
- Taxon
- mangoes
_from_India.jpg?width=60)
Mangifera indicat0 - Treatment
- Shadinge0
- Outcome
- vegetative growth, floweringe0
- Direction
- reductione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Shading caused considerable reduction in vegetative growth, flowering”
t0“MANGOES”
Claim · model-written summary
Shading reduced final fruit retention in mango.
- Taxon
- mangoesMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- Shadinge0
- Outcome
- final fruit retentione1
- Direction
- reductione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Shading caused considerable reduction in vegetative growth”
e1“final fruit retention”
t0“MANGOES”
Claim · model-written summary
Shading delayed the ripening date of mango fruit by 7-10 days.
- Taxon
- mangoesMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- Shadinge0
- Outcome
- ripehing datee1
- Direction
- delayede1
- Value
- 7-10 dayse1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Shading caused considerable reduction in vegetative growth”
e1“delayed ripehing date from 7-10 days”
t0“MANGOES”
Claim · model-written summary
Shading increased fruit total soluble solids (T.T.S.) in mango.
- Taxon
- mangoesMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- Shadinge0
- Outcome
- fruit T.T.S.e1
- Direction
- increasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Shading caused considerable reduction in vegetative growth”
e1“it increased fruit T.T.S.”
t0“MANGOES”
Claim · model-written summary
Shading decreased the number of mature fruit per panicle in mango.
- Taxon
- mangoesMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- Shadinge0
- Outcome
- mature fruit number perpaniclee0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Shading also decreased mature fruit number perpanicle and acidity of fruit juice”
t0“MANGOES”
Claim · model-written summary
Shading decreased the acidity of fruit juice in mango.
- Taxon
- mangoesMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- Shadinge0
- Outcome
- acidity of fruit juicee0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Shading also decreased mature fruit number perpanicle and acidity of fruit juice”
t0“MANGOES”
Claim · model-written summary
Shading increased the percentage of leaf water content in mango.
- Taxon
- mangoesMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- shadinge0
- Outcome
- leaf water contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Also shading increased the percentage of leaf water content”
t0“MANGOES”
Claim · model-written summary
Shading was accompanied by a remarkable decrease in the osmotic pressure of the leaf sap of mango.
- Taxon
- mangoesMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- shadinge0
- Outcome
- osmotic pressure of the leaf sape1
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Also shading increased the percentage of leaf water content”
e1“osmotic pressure of the leaf sap”
t0“MANGOES”
Claim · model-written summary
Shading increased total indoles in mango.
- Taxon
- mangoesMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- shadinge0
- Outcome
- Total indolese0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Total indoles increased by shading”
t0“MANGOES”
Claim · model-written summary
Shading decreased total phenols and the phenols/indoles ratio in the terminal buds of mango.
- Taxon
- mangoesMangifera indicat0
- Organ / stage
- terminal budse1
- Treatment
- shadinge0
- Outcome
- total phenols and phenols/Indoles ratioe1
- Direction
- decreasede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Total indoles increased by shading”
e1“total phenols and phenols/Indoles ratio decreased in the terminal buds”
t0“MANGOES”
The same questions in other papers
shade · growth · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
shade · yield · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.