Paper · 2025 · BMC Plant Biology

Gypsum and press mud application alleviate the deleterious effects of sodic water irrigation in Guava (Psidium Guajava L. cv. Taiwan Pink)

Akshay Machra; Raj Kumar; Anshuman Singh; et al.

15
claims
35
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Guava is a major fruit crop in sodic soil regions of north-western India. However, the responses of guava to sodic irrigation in terms of growth, physiology, and fruit quality remain elusive. This study evaluated the effects of sodic irrigation with varying residual sodium carbonate (RSC; 2.5-7.5 meq L⁻¹), with or without amendments (gypsum and press mud), on the growth, physiological traits, mineral nutrition, and fruit quality of guava cv. Taiwan Pink over two consecutive seasons. Sodic irrigation markedly suppressed plant growth, including height, canopy spread, stem girth, leaf area, and branching, with greater reductions at higher RSC levels (5.0-7.5 meq L⁻¹). Photosynthetic rate, leaf chlorophyll content, relative water content, osmotic potential, and membrane stability also declined under sodicity stress, whereas proline accumulation and antioxidant enzyme (ascorbate peroxidase, catalase, peroxidase, and superoxide dismutase) activities increased, reflecting adaptive responses to sodicity-induced osmotic and oxidative stresses. Sodic conditions reduced leaf K⁺, Ca²⁺, and Mg²⁺ contents and increased Na⁺ accumulation. Despite these physiological and biochemical disruptions, fruit quality attributes remained largely stable across treatments. Principal component analysis indicated strong interrelationships among growth and physiological traits, whereas fruit quality traits formed a distinct cluster, and Na⁺ accumulation and stress indicators were negatively associated with plant vigor. Gypsum was more effective than press mud in alleviating sodicity stress, enhancing the plant growth, increasing photosynthetic rate (~ 10%) and chlorophyll content (4-6%), and reducing leaf Na⁺ (9.8-38.2%) across RSC levels, compared to comparatively smaller improvements achieved with press mud. Overall, the findings indicate that Taiwan Pink guava can tolerate moderate sodicity without appreciable declines in fruit quality, and that soil amendments- especially gypsum- effectively improved plant growth and physiological performance under sodic irrigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodic irrigation suppressed guava growth, with greater reductions at higher RSC levels.

Treatment
Sodic irrigatione0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
suppressede0
Qualifier
higher RSC levels (5.0-7.5 meq L⁻¹)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sodic irrigation markedly suppressed plant growth, including height, canopy spread, stem girth, leaf area, and branching, with greater reductions at higher RSC levels (5.0-7.5 meq L⁻¹).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–673 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodicity stress decreased photosynthetic and water status traits.

Treatment
sodicity stresse0
Outcome
Photosynthetic rate, leaf chlorophyll content, relative water contente0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthetic rate, leaf chlorophyll content, relative water content, osmotic potential, and membrane stability also declined under sodicity stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodicity stress decreased osmotic potential and membrane stability.

Treatment
sodicity stresse0
Outcome
osmotic potential, and membrane stabilitye0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“osmotic potential, and membrane stability also declined under sodicity stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodicity stress increased proline accumulation and antioxidant enzyme activities.

Treatment
sodicity stresse1
Outcome
proline accumulation and antioxidant enzyme (ascorbate peroxidase, catalase, peroxidase, and superoxide dismutase) activitiese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“proline accumulation and antioxidant enzyme (ascorbate peroxidase, catalase, peroxidase, and superoxide dismutase) activities increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–967 · show in text ↑
e1

“under sodicity stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodic conditions reduced leaf K⁺, Ca²⁺, and Mg²⁺ contents.

Treatment
Sodic conditionse0
Outcome
leaf K⁺, Ca²⁺, and Mg²⁺ contentse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sodic conditions reduced leaf K⁺, Ca²⁺, and Mg²⁺ contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1108 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sodic conditions increased Na⁺ accumulation.

Treatment
Sodic conditionse0
Outcome
Na⁺ accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sodic conditions reduced leaf K⁺, Ca²⁺, and Mg²⁺ contents and increased Na⁺ accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1139 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit quality attributes remained largely stable across treatments.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
fruit quality attributese0
Direction
stablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit quality attributes remained largely stable across treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth and physiological traits had strong interrelationships.

Outcome
growth and physiological traitse0

Not reportedOrgan / stageDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Principal component analysis indicated strong interrelationships among growth and physiological traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1368 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit quality traits formed a distinct cluster.

Outcome
fruit quality traits formed a distinct clustere0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit quality traits formed a distinct cluster”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1424 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Na⁺ accumulation and stress indicators were negatively associated with plant vigor.

Compound
Na⁺e0
Outcome
plant vigore0
Direction
negatively associatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Na⁺ accumulation and stress indicators were negatively associated with plant vigor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1512 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum alleviated sodicity stress more effectively than press mud.

Treatment
Gypsume0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
enhancinge0
Comparator
press mude0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gypsum was more effective than press mud in alleviating sodicity stress, enhancing the plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1613 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum increased photosynthetic rate by about 10% across RSC levels.

Treatment
Gypsume1
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
~ 10%e0
Comparator
press mude1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing photosynthetic rate (~ 10%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1653 · show in text ↑
e1

“Gypsum was more effective than press mud in alleviating sodicity stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1585 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum increased chlorophyll content by 4-6% across RSC levels.

Treatment
Gypsume1
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
4-6%e0
Comparator
press mude1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyll content (4-6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1658–1684 · show in text ↑
e1

“Gypsum was more effective than press mud in alleviating sodicity stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1585 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gypsum reduced leaf Na⁺ by 9.8-38.2% across RSC levels.

Treatment
Gypsume1
Outcome
leaf Na⁺e0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
9.8-38.2%e0
Comparator
press mude1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reducing leaf Na⁺ (9.8-38.2%) across RSC levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1690–1737 · show in text ↑
e1

“Gypsum was more effective than press mud in alleviating sodicity stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1585 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Press mud produced smaller improvements than gypsum.

Treatment
press mude0
Outcome
improvementse0
Direction
smallere0
Comparator
Gypsume1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“comparatively smaller improvements achieved with press mud”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1751–1809 · show in text ↑
e1

“Gypsum was more effective than press mud in alleviating sodicity stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1585 · show in text ↑
t0

“Guava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–101 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 6 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

salinity · physiology: water · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

salinity · nutrient: content · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

salinity · physiology: photosynthesis · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

8 papers: 0 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

salinity · growth · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree

14 papers: 0 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.