Paper · 2025 · Scientific Reports

Performance of oat under different cutting scheduling and integrated nutrient management in Eastern Himalayan agroclimatic conditions of India

R. Joseph Koireng; Kholu Mary; Jeti Konsam; et al.

9
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Oat is versatile and highly nutritious crop and it can be effectively utilized as dual-purpose for fodder and seed production. Generally, farmers are growing oat in very limited and poor in quality in Manipur state of India. Growing fodder oat with correct nutrient management results in increased productivity as well as quality fodder production of oat. Therefore productivity of livestock in study area can be increased with full amount of fodder supplied to livestock. A two-year study was conducted to examine the effect of different cutting management and nutrient management on performance of fodder oat and economics of the system using factorial randomized block design (FRBD). The results revealed that among the different cutting scheduling, three cuts at 60, 90 and 120 days after sowing gave significantly higher green fodder production. However, the maximum gross return, net return, benefit: cost (BCR) and crude protein (CP) percentage was observed under single cut at 60 days after sowing (DAS) + seed. Among the different level of nutrient management, 50% NPK of RDF + 7.5 t FYM ha −1 significantly increased the green fodder yield, dry matter production, seed yield, crude protein content and economics of oat in Eastern Himalayan region of India The study inference that combination of cutting scheduling of fodder at 60 DAS with the application of 50% NPK of RDF + 7.5 t FYM ha −1 can be recommended for higher productivity of quality fodder of dual purpose of oat in Eastern Himalayan region of Manipur state of India.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Three cuts at 60, 90 and 120 days significantly increased green fodder production.

Treatment
three cuts at 60, 90 and 120 days after sowinge0
Outcome
green fodder productione0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“three cuts at 60, 90 and 120 days after sowing gave significantly higher green fodder production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–849 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A single cut at 60 days plus seed maximized gross return and net return.

Treatment
single cut at 60 days after sowing (DAS) + seede0
Outcome
gross return, net returne0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum gross return, net return, benefit: cost (BCR) and crude protein (CP) percentage was observed under single cut at 60 days after sowing (DAS) + seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–1018 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A single cut at 60 days plus seed maximized benefit: cost ratio.

Treatment
single cut at 60 days after sowing (DAS) + seede0
Outcome
benefit: cost (BCR)e0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum gross return, net return, benefit: cost (BCR) and crude protein (CP) percentage was observed under single cut at 60 days after sowing (DAS) + seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–1018 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A single cut at 60 days plus seed maximized crude protein percentage.

Treatment
single cut at 60 days after sowing (DAS) + seede0
Outcome
crude protein (CP) percentagee0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum gross return, net return, benefit: cost (BCR) and crude protein (CP) percentage was observed under single cut at 60 days after sowing (DAS) + seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–1018 · show in text ↑
t0

“oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

50% NPK plus FYM significantly raised green fodder and dry matter production.

Treatment
50% NPK of RDF + 7.5 t FYM ha −1e0
Outcome
green fodder yield, dry matter productione0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
Eastern Himalayan region of Indiae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“50% NPK of RDF + 7.5 t FYM ha −1 significantly increased the green fodder yield, dry matter production, seed yield, crude protein content and economics of oat in Eastern Himalayan region of India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

50% NPK plus FYM significantly increased seed yield.

Treatment
50% NPK of RDF + 7.5 t FYM ha −1e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“50% NPK of RDF + 7.5 t FYM ha −1 significantly increased the green fodder yield, dry matter production, seed yield, crude protein content and economics of oat in Eastern Himalayan region of India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

50% NPK plus FYM significantly increased crude protein content.

Treatment
50% NPK of RDF + 7.5 t FYM ha −1e0
Outcome
crude protein contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“50% NPK of RDF + 7.5 t FYM ha −1 significantly increased the green fodder yield, dry matter production, seed yield, crude protein content and economics of oat in Eastern Himalayan region of India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1265 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

50% NPK plus FYM significantly improved oat economics.

Treatment
50% NPK of RDF + 7.5 t FYM ha −1e0
Outcome
economics of oate0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“50% NPK of RDF + 7.5 t FYM ha −1 significantly increased the green fodder yield, dry matter production, seed yield, crude protein content and economics of oat in Eastern Himalayan region of India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1265 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend a 60-day fodder cut with 50% NPK plus FYM for quality dual-purpose oat fodder.

Outcome
combination of cutting scheduling of fodder at 60 DAS with the application of 50% NPK of RDF + 7.5 t FYM ha −1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combination of cutting scheduling of fodder at 60 DAS with the application of 50% NPK of RDF + 7.5 t FYM ha −1 can be recommended for higher productivity of quality fodder of dual purpose of oat in Eastern Himalayan region of Manipur state of India”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1539 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: protein · Avena sativa (oats)Results differ

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

fertilization · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 143 positive, 17 negative or no effect

142 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.