Paper · 2025 · Menoufia Journal of Plant Production

IMPACT OF PLANT DENSITY ON PRODUCTIVITY OF SOME PANICUM CULTIVARS AT DESERT SOILS

H. A Shoman; M.M Bughdady A

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In light of increasing water scarcity and the urgent need for sustainable forage production in arid regions, two field experiments were conducted at the Agricultural Experimental Station of the Desert Research Center (D.R.C.), El-Kharga Oasis, New Valley Governorate, Egypt (27°47.7′N, 30°24.7′E) during the 2021 and 2022 seasons. The study aimed to evaluate the impact of planting density on the growth and productivity of panicum cultivars under the arid conditions of the New Valley. Significant differences were observed among cultivars in both seasons. The cultivar Arowana consistently outperformed the others across all measured traits, followed by Mombasa. Plant density had a significant effect on all parameters. The spacing of 60 cm between rows and 50 cm between plants proved most effective, particularly in 2021, when Arowana produced the tallest plants 134.2 cm, the highest number of tillers per plant 22.03, the greatest net photosynthetic rate 21.81 µmol CO₂ m⁻² s⁻¹, and the maximum green and dry forage yields averaging 3,271 and 1,498 kg fed⁻¹ per cut, respectively. Moreover, the Arowana exhibited the highest water use efficiency, at 2.97 kg fresh weight per m³ of water. In contrast, the widest spacing, 80 × 30 cm, gave the lowest values for most traits, except for leaf fiber content, which showed the opposite trend. Overall, optimizing planting density, particularly at 60 × 50 cm, markedly enhances panicum growth, yield, and water use efficiency under desert conditions, supporting sustainable livestock feed production and improving agricultural resilience in arid regions

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Panicum cultivars differed significantly in both seasons.

Taxon
PANICUMPanicumt0
Outcome
Significant differences were observed among cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panicum
Panicum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryBonnie Semmling · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PANICUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significant differences were observed among cultivars in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–556 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cultivar Arowana consistently outperformed the others across all measured traits, followed by Mombasa.

Taxon
PANICUMPanicumt0
Material
Arowanae0
Outcome
outperformed the others across all measured traitse0
Qualifier
followed by Mombasae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panicum
Panicum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryBonnie Semmling · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PANICUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“The cultivar Arowana consistently outperformed the others across all measured traits, followed by Mombasa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant density had a significant effect on all measured parameters of panicum.

Taxon
PANICUMPanicumt0
Treatment
Plant densitye0
Outcome
all parameterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panicum
Panicum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryBonnie Semmling · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PANICUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“Plant density had a significant effect on all parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–721 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The spacing of 60 cm between rows and 50 cm between plants proved most effective for panicum.

Taxon
PANICUMPanicumt0
Treatment
spacing of 60 cm between rows and 50 cm between plantse0
Outcome
most effectivee0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panicum
Panicum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryBonnie Semmling · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PANICUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“The spacing of 60 cm between rows and 50 cm between plants proved most effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–803 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2021, Arowana produced the tallest plants, 134.2 cm.

Taxon
PANICUMPanicumt0
Material
Arowanae0
Outcome
tallest plantse0
Direction
talleste0
Value
134.2 cme0
Qualifier
in 2021e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panicum
Panicum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryBonnie Semmling · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PANICUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“in 2021, when Arowana produced the tallest plants 134.2 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–876 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arowana exhibited the highest water use efficiency, 2.97 kg fresh weight per m3 of water.

Taxon
PANICUMPanicumt0
Material
Arowanae0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.97 kg fresh weight per m³ of watere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panicum
Panicum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryBonnie Semmling · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PANICUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“the Arowana exhibited the highest water use efficiency, at 2.97 kg fresh weight per m³ of water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The widest spacing, 80 x 30 cm, gave the lowest values for most traits of panicum.

Taxon
PANICUMPanicumt0
Treatment
widest spacing, 80 × 30 cme0
Outcome
most traitse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panicum
Panicum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryBonnie Semmling · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PANICUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“the widest spacing, 80 × 30 cm, gave the lowest values for most traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1278 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf fiber content showed the opposite trend (not lowest) at the widest spacing, 80 x 30 cm.

Taxon
PANICUMPanicumt0
Treatment
widest spacing, 80 × 30 cme0
Outcome
leaf fiber contente1
Direction
opposite trende1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panicum
Panicum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryBonnie Semmling · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“PANICUM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“the widest spacing, 80 × 30 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1238 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf fiber content, which showed the opposite trend”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1342 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that optimizing planting density, particularly at 60 x 50 cm, markedly enhances panicum growth, yield and water use efficiency under desert conditions.

Taxon
panicumPanicume0
Treatment
optimizing planting density, particularly at 60 × 50 cme0
Outcome
growth, yield, and water use efficiencye0
Setting
desert conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Panicum
Panicum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryBonnie Semmling · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“optimizing planting density, particularly at 60 × 50 cm, markedly enhances panicum growth, yield, and water use efficiency under desert conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1353–1499 · show in text ↑