Paper · 2025 · Applied Sciences

Yield Components Analysis in Partially Interspecific Lines of Cotton and Irrigation-Nitrogen Effects

Vasileios Greveniotis; Elisavet Bouloumpasi; Adriana Skendi; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cotton production in Mediterranean regions is increasingly constrained by limited water availability, making it essential to identify genotypes that can maintain yield under reduced irrigation. In this study, four partially interspecific cotton lines (Pa7) and the commercial cultivar Celia were evaluated under two nitrogen rates designed to test resource-use efficiency and three irrigation regimes across two growing seasons in Greece. A strip–split plot design with three replications was used, and field data were analyzed with ANOVA, stability indices, and multivariate tools (Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction—AMMI, and Genotype plus Genotype × Environment—GGE biplots). Results showed that moderate irrigation consistently ensured stable seed cotton yields, whereas a higher water supply increased the plant height without proportional yield benefits, while fertilizer supplied in the specific quantities showed a lower impact on yield stability. Genotype × environment interactions were highly significant: Celia confirmed its high stability, while line M3 combined good stability with favorable agronomic traits. Yield was strongly associated with boll weight and lint percentage, indicating their usefulness as indirect selection criteria. These findings highlight the agronomic potential of partially interspecific cotton lines and demonstrate that moderate irrigation can sustain productivity while reducing water inputs, contributing to a more efficient use of resources in cotton production under water-limited conditions. These results provide practical insights for breeding and water management strategies aiming to sustain cotton productivity under Mediterranean water-limited conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate irrigation consistently ensured stable seed cotton yields.

Treatment
moderate irrigatione0
Outcome
seed cotton yieldse0
Direction
stablee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“moderate irrigation consistently ensured stable seed cotton yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher water supply increased plant height.

Treatment
higher water supplye0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a higher water supply increased the plant height without proportional yield benefits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–877 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher water supply did not provide proportional yield benefits.

Treatment
higher water supplye0
Outcome
yield benefitse0
Direction
without proportionale0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a higher water supply increased the plant height without proportional yield benefits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–877 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tested fertilizer quantities had lower impact on yield stability.

Treatment
fertilizer supplied in the specific quantitiese0
Outcome
yield stabilitye0
Direction
lower impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilizer supplied in the specific quantities showed a lower impact on yield stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype × environment interactions were highly significant.

Material
Genotypee0
Outcome
Genotype × environment interactionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genotype × environment interactions were highly significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1033 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Celia had high yield stability.

Material
Celiae0
Outcome
high stabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Celia confirmed its high stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1069 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Line M3 combined good stability with favorable agronomic traits.

Material
M3e0
Outcome
good stability with favorable agronomic traitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“line M3 combined good stability with favorable agronomic traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield was strongly associated with boll weight.

Organ / stage
bolle0
Outcome
Yielde0
Qualifier
strongly associatede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield was strongly associated with boll weight and lint percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield was strongly associated with lint percentage.

Material
lint percentagee0
Outcome
Yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield was strongly associated with boll weight and lint percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1208 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Boll weight and lint percentage were identified as useful indirect selection criteria.

Outcome
indirect selection criteriae0
Qualifier
boll weight and lint percentagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield was strongly associated with boll weight and lint percentage, indicating their usefulness as indirect selection criteria.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 101 positive, 43 negative or no effect

100 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. negative

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

irrigation · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

399 papers: 304 positive, 95 negative or no effect

303 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

395 papers more in this group

See all 399 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.