Paper · 2025 · Journal of Environmental Quality

Assessment of engineered sustainable nitrogen fertilizers on lettuce development using physical sampling and image‐based phenotyping

Julia Farias; Matthew Conley; Matthew T. Herritt; et al.

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Efficient and sustainable nitrogen (N) management is critical for addressing the dual challenges of maximizing productivity and mitigating environmental impacts in short-cycle crops like lettuce (Lactuca sativa). This study evaluates the agronomic performance and nutrient dynamics of eight N fertilizer treatments, including mechanochemically synthesized urea-based cocrystals, conventional urea, and mechanochemically synthesized carbonate salts alongside accessible digital phenotyping methods for a greenhouse-grown romaine lettuce system. Plant growth, biomass production, chlorophyll content, and soil N residues were measured in conjunction with digital image-derived spectral indices from traditional photography. Engineered sulfate cocrystals (zinc sulfate urea and copper sulfate urea) performed comparable to or better than urea in promoting growth and N use efficiency, while engineered carbonates displayed moderate responses, likely due to slower N release. Traditional image-based indices such as normalized green-red difference index, hue angle, and green color distance metric, as well as more unique visual calculations, effectively captured plant nutritional status and correlated with chlorophyll levels. Principal component and cluster analyses further distinguished treatment performance based on growth and color metrics. These findings demonstrate the potential of combining novel N delivery systems with low-cost phenotyping technologies to transform sustainable nutrient management practices across diverse crop systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Engineered zinc and copper sulfate urea cocrystals performed comparable to or better than urea in promoting lettuce growth and N use efficiency.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Engineered sulfate cocrystals (zinc sulfate urea and copper sulfate urea)e1
Outcome
growth and N use efficiencye1
Direction
comparable to or better thane1
Comparator
ureae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“Engineered sulfate cocrystals (zinc sulfate urea and copper sulfate urea) performed comparable to or better than urea in promoting growth and N use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–880 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Engineered carbonates gave moderate lettuce responses, likely due to slower N release.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
engineered carbonatese2
Outcome
moderate responsese2
Qualifier
likely due to slower N releasee2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–80 · show in text ↑
e2

“engineered carbonates displayed moderate responses, likely due to slower N release”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–970 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Image-based colour indices effectively captured lettuce nutritional status when compared with chlorophyll levels.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
plant nutritional statuse3
Qualifier
effectively capturede3
Comparator
chlorophyll levelse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–80 · show in text ↑
e3

“Traditional image-based indices such as normalized green-red difference index, hue angle, and green color distance metric, as well as more unique visual calculations, effectively captured plant nutritional status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1184 · show in text ↑
e4

“correlated with chlorophyll levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1223 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Traditional image-based indices were correlated with lettuce chlorophyll levels.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Compound
chlorophyll levelse4
Outcome
Traditional image-based indicese3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–80 · show in text ↑
e3

“Traditional image-based indices such as normalized green-red difference index, hue angle, and green color distance metric, as well as more unique visual calculations, effectively captured plant nutritional status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1184 · show in text ↑
e4

“correlated with chlorophyll levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1223 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Principal component and cluster analyses distinguished treatment performance based on growth and colour metrics.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
treatment performancee5
Qualifier
based on growth and color metricse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–80 · show in text ↑
e5

“Principal component and cluster analyses further distinguished treatment performance based on growth and color metrics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1343 · show in text ↑

copper(II) sulfate · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

sulfate · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

zinc sulfate · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results differ

85 papers: 60 positive, 25 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.