Paper · 2025 · Agronomy

Chlormequat Chloride and Uniconazole Regulate Lodging Resistance and Yield Formation of Wheat Through Different Strategies

Huimin Li; Tao Li; Wenan Weng; et al.

14
claims
27
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Lodging is one of the key limiting factors in achieving high wheat yield. The application of plant growth retardants (PGRts) is regarded as an effective practice to prevent lodging. For accurate PGRt selection and the establishment of stable, high-yield production plans, it is essential to make clear the regulation strategies for lodging resistance and yield in PGRts. Field experiments were conducted at two test sites. At the initial jointing stage of wheat, Chlormequat Chloride (CCC) or Uniconazole (S3307) was sprayed. Compared with the control (CK), spraying CCC or S3307 significantly reduced the culm lodging index (CLI) and decreased the lodging rate from 7.1% to 15.6%. CCC was more capable of adjusting plant morphology (reducing plant height and second internode length and increasing stem diameter), while S3307 was more effective in enhancing breaking strength. The contents of GA, IAA, and zeatin nucleoside (ZR) and the activities of lignin-related enzymes (TAL and CAD) were significantly correlated with different stem indicators and CLI. Compared with CK, the yield after spraying CCC or S3307 increased by 6.5% and 6.0%, respectively. CCC mainly enhanced the yield by increasing grain weight per spike and the SPAD value of leaves, while S3307 mainly did so by increasing the number of spikes and the effective leaf area. Moreover, carbon metabolism-related enzymes (Rubisco, SS, and SPS) were significantly positively correlated with the yield. The enzyme activity of CCC was higher at the heading stage, while that of S3307 was higher at the filling stage. Hence, spraying CCC or S3307 can significantly enhance lodging resistance and yield. The optimal PGRts should be selected based on the climate and the growth stage of the wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC reduced wheat culm lodging index and lodging rate.

Treatment
CCCe0
Outcome
culm lodging index (CLI)e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
7.1% to 15.6%e0
Qualifier
lodging ratee0
Comparator
control (CK)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the control (CK), spraying CCC or S3307 significantly reduced the culm lodging index (CLI) and decreased the lodging rate from 7.1% to 15.6%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–681 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

S3307 reduced wheat culm lodging index and lodging rate.

Treatment
S3307e0
Outcome
culm lodging index (CLI)e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
7.1% to 15.6%e0
Qualifier
lodging ratee0
Comparator
control (CK)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the control (CK), spraying CCC or S3307 significantly reduced the culm lodging index (CLI) and decreased the lodging rate from 7.1% to 15.6%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–681 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC reduced wheat plant height and second internode length.

Treatment
CCCe0
Outcome
plant height and second internode lengthe0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CCC was more capable of adjusting plant morphology (reducing plant height and second internode length and increasing stem diameter)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–813 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC increased wheat stem diameter.

Treatment
CCCe0
Outcome
stem diametere0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CCC was more capable of adjusting plant morphology (reducing plant height and second internode length and increasing stem diameter)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–813 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S3307 was more effective in enhancing wheat breaking strength.

Treatment
S3307e0
Outcome
breaking strengthe0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while S3307 was more effective in enhancing breaking strength.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–877 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hormone contents and lignin-related enzyme activities correlated significantly with stem indicators and CLI.

Gene
TAL and CADe0
Compound
GA, IAA, and zeatin nucleoside (ZR)e0
Outcome
different stem indicators and CLIe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The contents of GA, IAA, and zeatin nucleoside (ZR) and the activities of lignin-related enzymes (TAL and CAD) were significantly correlated with different stem indicators and CLI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC increased wheat yield by 6.5%.

Treatment
CCCe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.5%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with CK, the yield after spraying CCC or S3307 increased by 6.5% and 6.0%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1156 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S3307 increased wheat yield by 6.0%.

Treatment
S3307e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.0%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with CK, the yield after spraying CCC or S3307 increased by 6.5% and 6.0%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1156 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC increased grain weight per spike and leaf SPAD value.

Treatment
CCCe0
Outcome
grain weight per spike and the SPAD value of leavese0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CCC mainly enhanced the yield by increasing grain weight per spike and the SPAD value of leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1252 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S3307 increased spike number and effective leaf area.

Treatment
S3307e0
Outcome
number of spikes and the effective leaf areae0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“S3307 mainly did so by increasing the number of spikes and the effective leaf area.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon metabolism enzyme activities correlated positively with wheat yield.

Gene
Rubisco, SS, and SPSe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
positivelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“carbon metabolism-related enzymes (Rubisco, SS, and SPS) were significantly positively correlated with the yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1467 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC-associated enzyme activity was higher at heading.

Organ / stage
heading stagee0
Outcome
enzyme activitye0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The enzyme activity of CCC was higher at the heading stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1526 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S3307-associated enzyme activity was higher at filling.

Organ / stage
filling stagee0
Outcome
S3307e0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while that of S3307 was higher at the filling stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1580 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–93 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend selecting PGRts based on climate and wheat growth stage.

Outcome
PGRts should be selected based on the climate and the growth stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal PGRts should be selected based on the climate and the growth stage of the wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1758 · show in text ↑

chlormequat chloride · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

chlormequat chloride · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

49 papers: 37 positive, 12 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

chlormequat chloride · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

71 papers: 53 positive, 18 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.